Literature DB >> 33937844

Improving Breast Cancer Detection Accuracy of Mammography with the Concurrent Use of an Artificial Intelligence Tool.

Serena Pacilè1, January Lopez1, Pauline Chone1, Thomas Bertinotti1, Jean Marie Grouin1, Pierre Fillard1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the benefits of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool for two-dimensional mammography in the breast cancer detection process.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this multireader, multicase retrospective study, 14 radiologists assessed a dataset of 240 digital mammography images, acquired between 2013 and 2016, using a counterbalance design in which half of the dataset was read without AI and the other half with the help of AI during a first session and vice versa during a second session, which was separated from the first by a washout period. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and reading time were assessed as endpoints.
RESULTS: The average AUC across readers was 0.769 (95% CI: 0.724, 0.814) without AI and 0.797 (95% CI: 0.754, 0.840) with AI. The average difference in AUC was 0.028 (95% CI: 0.002, 0.055, P = .035). Average sensitivity was increased by 0.033 when using AI support (P = .021). Reading time changed dependently to the AI-tool score. For low likelihood of malignancy (< 2.5%), the time was about the same in the first reading session and slightly decreased in the second reading session. For higher likelihood of malignancy, the reading time was on average increased with the use of AI.
CONCLUSION: This clinical investigation demonstrated that the concurrent use of this AI tool improved the diagnostic performance of radiologists in the detection of breast cancer without prolonging their workflow.Supplemental material is available for this article.© RSNA, 2020. 2020 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33937844      PMCID: PMC8082372          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2020190208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  27 in total

Review 1.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

Authors:  M G Marmot; D G Altman; D A Cameron; J A Dewar; S G Thompson; M Wilcox
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 2.  Identifying and avoiding bias in research.

Authors:  Christopher J Pannucci; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Large scale deep learning for computer aided detection of mammographic lesions.

Authors:  Thijs Kooi; Geert Litjens; Bram van Ginneken; Albert Gubern-Mérida; Clara I Sánchez; Ritse Mann; Ard den Heeten; Nico Karssemeijer
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  Detection of Breast Cancer with Mammography: Effect of an Artificial Intelligence Support System.

Authors:  Alejandro Rodríguez-Ruiz; Elizabeth Krupinski; Jan-Jurre Mordang; Kathy Schilling; Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Ioannis Sechopoulos; Ritse M Mann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Elizabeth S McDonald; Anne Marie McCarthy; Amana L Akhtar; Marie B Synnestvedt; Mitchell Schnall; Emily F Conant
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Deep Neural Networks Improve Radiologists' Performance in Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Nan Wu; Jason Phang; Jungkyu Park; Yiqiu Shen; Zhe Huang; Masha Zorin; Stanislaw Jastrzebski; Thibault Fevry; Joe Katsnelson; Eric Kim; Stacey Wolfson; Ujas Parikh; Sushma Gaddam; Leng Leng Young Lin; Kara Ho; Joshua D Weinstein; Beatriu Reig; Yiming Gao; Hildegard Toth; Kristine Pysarenko; Alana Lewin; Jiyon Lee; Krystal Airola; Eralda Mema; Stephanie Chung; Esther Hwang; Naziya Samreen; S Gene Kim; Laura Heacock; Linda Moy; Kyunghyun Cho; Krzysztof J Geras
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Multireader sample size program for diagnostic studies: demonstration and methodology.

Authors:  Stephen L Hillis; Kevin M Schartz
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-11-30

8.  Improved Cancer Detection Using Artificial Intelligence: a Retrospective Evaluation of Missed Cancers on Mammography.

Authors:  Alyssa T Watanabe; Vivian Lim; Hoanh X Vu; Richard Chim; Eric Weise; Jenna Liu; William G Bradley; Christopher E Comstock
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Scott Mayer McKinney; Marcin Sieniek; Varun Godbole; Jonathan Godwin; Natasha Antropova; Hutan Ashrafian; Trevor Back; Mary Chesus; Greg S Corrado; Ara Darzi; Mozziyar Etemadi; Florencia Garcia-Vicente; Fiona J Gilbert; Mark Halling-Brown; Demis Hassabis; Sunny Jansen; Alan Karthikesalingam; Christopher J Kelly; Dominic King; Joseph R Ledsam; David Melnick; Hormuz Mostofi; Lily Peng; Joshua Jay Reicher; Bernardino Romera-Paredes; Richard Sidebottom; Mustafa Suleyman; Daniel Tse; Kenneth C Young; Jeffrey De Fauw; Shravya Shetty
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  If you don't find it often, you often don't find it: why some cancers are missed in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Karla K Evans; Robyn L Birdwell; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Artificial Intelligence Detection of Missed Cancers at Digital Mammography That Were Detected at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Victor Dahlblom; Ingvar Andersson; Kristina Lång; Anders Tingberg; Sophia Zackrisson; Magnus Dustler
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2021-09-01

2.  Impact of artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening with mammography.

Authors:  Lan-Anh Dang; Emmanuel Chazard; Edouard Poncelet; Teodora Serb; Aniela Rusu; Xavier Pauwels; Clémence Parsy; Thibault Poclet; Hugo Cauliez; Constance Engelaere; Guillaume Ramette; Charlotte Brienne; Sofiane Dujardin; Nicolas Laurent
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Independent External Validation of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Automated Interpretation of Screening Mammography: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Anna W Anderson; M Luke Marinovich; Nehmat Houssami; Kathryn P Lowry; Joann G Elmore; Diana S M Buist; Solveig Hofvind; Christoph I Lee
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 4.  Ethics of AI in Pathology: Current Paradigms and Emerging Issues.

Authors:  Chhavi Chauhan; Rama R Gullapalli
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 5.770

5.  Breast Cancer Detection on Histopathological Images Using a Composite Dilated Backbone Network.

Authors:  Vinodkumar Mohanakurup; Syam Machinathu Parambil Gangadharan; Pallavi Goel; Devvret Verma; Sameer Alshehri; Ramgopal Kashyap; Baitullah Malakhil
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-06

Review 6.  [Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Mammography from a Development and Validation Perspective].

Authors:  Ki Hwan Kim; Sang Hyup Lee
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2021-01-31

7.  Detection of Degenerative Changes on MR Images of the Lumbar Spine with a Convolutional Neural Network: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Nils Christian Lehnen; Robert Haase; Jennifer Faber; Theodor Rüber; Hartmut Vatter; Alexander Radbruch; Frederic Carsten Schmeel
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19

8.  Diagnostic Performance of AI for Cancers Registered in A Mammography Screening Program: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Inci Kizildag Yirgin; Yilmaz Onat Koyluoglu; Mustafa Ege Seker; Sibel Ozkan Gurdal; Ayse Nilufer Ozaydin; Beyza Ozcinar; Neslihan Cabioğlu; Vahit Ozmen; Erkin Aribal
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

9.  Use of artificial intelligence for image analysis in breast cancer screening programmes: systematic review of test accuracy.

Authors:  Karoline Freeman; Julia Geppert; Chris Stinton; Daniel Todkill; Samantha Johnson; Aileen Clarke; Sian Taylor-Phillips
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2021-09-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.