Literature DB >> 33937833

MRI Manufacturer Shift and Adaptation: Increasing the Generalizability of Deep Learning Segmentation for MR Images Acquired with Different Scanners.

Wenjun Yan1, Lu Huang1, Liming Xia1, Shengjia Gu1, Fuhua Yan1, Yuanyuan Wang1, Qian Tao1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To quantitatively evaluate the generalizability of a deep learning segmentation tool to MRI data from scanners of different MRI manufacturers and to improve the cross-manufacturer performance by using a manufacturer-adaptation strategy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 150 cine MRI datasets from three MRI manufacturers, acquired between 2017 and 2018 (n = 50 for manufacturer 1, manufacturer 2, and manufacturer 3). Three convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were trained to segment the left ventricle (LV), using datasets exclusively from images from a single manufacturer. A generative adversarial network (GAN) was trained to adapt the input image before segmentation. The LV segmentation performance, end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), LV mass, and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) were evaluated before and after manufacturer adaptation. Paired Wilcoxon signed rank tests were performed.
RESULTS: The segmentation CNNs exhibited a significant performance drop when applied to datasets from different manufacturers (Dice reduced from 89.7% ± 2.3 [standard deviation] to 68.7% ± 10.8, P < .05, from 90.6% ± 2.1 to 59.5% ± 13.3, P < .05, from 89.2% ± 2.3 to 64.1% ± 12.0, P < .05, for manufacturer 1, 2, and 3, respectively). After manufacturer adaptation, the segmentation performance was significantly improved (from 68.7% ± 10.8 to 84.3% ± 6.2, P < .05, from 72.4% ± 10.2 to 85.7% ± 6.5, P < .05, for manufacturer 2 and 3, respectively). Quantitative LV function parameters were also significantly improved. For LVEF, the manufacturer adaptation increased the Pearson correlation from 0.005 to 0.89 for manufacturer 2 and from 0.77 to 0.94 for manufacturer 3.
CONCLUSION: A segmentation CNN well trained on datasets from one MRI manufacturer may not generalize well to datasets from other manufacturers. The proposed manufacturer adaptation can largely improve the generalizability of a deep learning segmentation tool without additional annotation.Supplemental material is available for this article.© RSNA, 2020. 2020 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33937833      PMCID: PMC8082399          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2020190195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  15 in total

1.  AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: fundamental physics of MR imaging.

Authors:  Robert A Pooley
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 2.  Deep learning.

Authors:  Yann LeCun; Yoshua Bengio; Geoffrey Hinton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Deep Learning-based Method for Fully Automatic Quantification of Left Ventricle Function from Cine MR Images: A Multivendor, Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Qian Tao; Wenjun Yan; Yuanyuan Wang; Elisabeth H M Paiman; Denis P Shamonin; Pankaj Garg; Sven Plein; Lu Huang; Liming Xia; Marek Sramko; Jarsolav Tintera; Albert de Roos; Hildo J Lamb; Rob J van der Geest
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Multicenter, Scan-Rescan, Human and Machine Learning CMR Study to Test Generalizability and Precision in Imaging Biomarker Analysis: A Solid Basis for Future Work.

Authors:  Patrick M Colletti
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 7.792

5.  Assessing Radiology Research on Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Guide for Authors, Reviewers, and Readers-From the Radiology Editorial Board.

Authors:  David A Bluemke; Linda Moy; Miriam A Bredella; Birgit B Ertl-Wagner; Kathryn J Fowler; Vicky J Goh; Elkan F Halpern; Christopher P Hess; Mark L Schiebler; Clifford R Weiss
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Automatic segmentation of the uterus on MRI using a convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Yasuhisa Kurata; Mizuho Nishio; Aki Kido; Koji Fujimoto; Masahiro Yakami; Hiroyoshi Isoda; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 4.589

Review 7.  Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis.

Authors:  Dinggang Shen; Guorong Wu; Heung-Il Suk
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 9.590

8.  A Multicenter, Scan-Rescan, Human and Machine Learning CMR Study to Test Generalizability and Precision in Imaging Biomarker Analysis.

Authors:  Anish Bhuva; Wenjia Bai; Clement Lau; Rhodri Davies; Yang Ye; Heeraj Bulluck; Elisa McAlindon; Veronica Culotta; Peter Swoboda; Gabriella Captur; Thomas Treibel; Joao Augusto; Kristopher Knott; Andreas Seraphim; Graham Cole; Steffen Petersen; Nicola Edwards; John Greenwood; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Alun Hughes; Daniel Rueckert; James Moon; Charlotte Manisty
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 7.792

9.  Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index.

Authors:  Kelly H Zou; Simon K Warfield; Aditya Bharatha; Clare M C Tempany; Michael R Kaus; Steven J Haker; William M Wells; Ferenc A Jolesz; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  DRINet for Medical Image Segmentation.

Authors:  Liang Chen; Paul Bentley; Kensaku Mori; Kazunari Misawa; Michitaka Fujiwara; Daniel Rueckert
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 10.048

View more
  8 in total

1.  Logistic Regression-Based Model Is More Efficient Than U-Net Model for Reliable Whole Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Segmentation.

Authors:  Henry Dieckhaus; Rozanna Meijboom; Serhat Okar; Tianxia Wu; Prasanna Parvathaneni; Yair Mina; Siddharthan Chandran; Adam D Waldman; Daniel S Reich; Govind Nair
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2022-06-28

2.  Multi-institutional Collaborations for Improving Deep Learning-based Magnetic Resonance Image Reconstruction Using Federated Learning.

Authors:  Pengfei Guo; Puyang Wang; Jinyuan Zhou; Shanshan Jiang; Vishal M Patel
Journal:  Proc IEEE Comput Soc Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit       Date:  2021-11-13

3.  Semisupervised Training of a Brain MRI Tumor Detection Model Using Mined Annotations.

Authors:  Nathaniel C Swinburne; Vivek Yadav; Julie Kim; Ye R Choi; David C Gutman; Jonathan T Yang; Nelson Moss; Jacqueline Stone; Jamie Tisnado; Vaios Hatzoglou; Sofia S Haque; Sasan Karimi; John Lyo; Krishna Juluru; Karl Pichotta; Jianjiong Gao; Sohrab P Shah; Andrei I Holodny; Robert J Young
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Deep Learning in Large and Multi-Site Structural Brain MR Imaging Datasets.

Authors:  Mariana Bento; Irene Fantini; Justin Park; Leticia Rittner; Richard Frayne
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.081

5.  Landmark Detection in Cardiac MRI by Using a Convolutional Neural Network.

Authors:  Hui Xue; Jessica Artico; Marianna Fontana; James C Moon; Rhodri H Davies; Peter Kellman
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2021-07-14

6.  Generative Adversarial Networks to Synthesize Missing T1 and FLAIR MRI Sequences for Use in a Multisequence Brain Tumor Segmentation Model.

Authors:  Gian Marco Conte; Alexander D Weston; David C Vogelsang; Kenneth A Philbrick; Jason C Cai; Maurizio Barbera; Francesco Sanvito; Daniel H Lachance; Robert B Jenkins; W Oliver Tobin; Jeanette E Eckel-Passow; Bradley J Erickson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Deep Learning Improves the Temporal Reproducibility of Aortic Measurement.

Authors:  Alex Bratt; Daniel J Blezek; William J Ryan; Kenneth A Philbrick; Prabhakar Rajiah; Yasmeen K Tandon; Lara A Walkoff; Jason C Cai; Emily N Sheedy; Panagiotis Korfiatis; Eric E Williamson; Bradley J Erickson; Jeremy D Collins
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.903

8.  Radiomic Deformation and Textural Heterogeneity (R-DepTH) Descriptor to Characterize Tumor Field Effect: Application to Survival Prediction in Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Marwa Ismail; Prateek Prasanna; Kaustav Bera; Volodymyr Statsevych; Virginia Hill; Gagandeep Singh; Sasan Partovi; Niha Beig; Sean McGarry; Peter Laviolette; Manmeet Ahluwalia; Anant Madabhushi; Pallavi Tiwari
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 11.037

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.