Literature DB >> 34047906

Deep Learning Improves the Temporal Reproducibility of Aortic Measurement.

Alex Bratt1, Daniel J Blezek2, William J Ryan2, Kenneth A Philbrick2, Prabhakar Rajiah2, Yasmeen K Tandon2, Lara A Walkoff2, Jason C Cai2, Emily N Sheedy2, Panagiotis Korfiatis2, Eric E Williamson2, Bradley J Erickson2, Jeremy D Collins2.   

Abstract

Imaging-based measurements form the basis of surgical decision making in patients with aortic aneurysm. Unfortunately, manual measurement suffer from suboptimal temporal reproducibility, which can lead to delayed or unnecessary intervention. We tested the hypothesis that deep learning could improve upon the temporal reproducibility of CT angiography-derived thoracic aortic measurements in the setting of imperfect ground-truth training data. To this end, we trained a standard deep learning segmentation model from which measurements of aortic volume and diameter could be extracted. First, three blinded cardiothoracic radiologists visually confirmed non-inferiority of deep learning segmentation maps with respect to manual segmentation on a 50-patient hold-out test cohort, demonstrating a slight preference for the deep learning method (p < 1e-5). Next, reproducibility was assessed by evaluating measured change (coefficient of reproducibility and standard deviation) in volume and diameter values extracted from segmentation maps in patients for whom multiple scans were available and whose aortas had been deemed stable over time by visual assessment (n = 57 patients, 206 scans). Deep learning temporal reproducibility was superior for measures of both volume (p < 0.008) and diameter (p < 1e-5) and reproducibility metrics compared favorably with previously reported values of manual inter-rater variability. Our work motivates future efforts to apply deep learning to aortic evaluation.
© 2021. Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34047906      PMCID: PMC8554928          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-021-00465-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.903


  23 in total

1.  2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with Thoracic Aortic Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine.

Authors:  Loren F Hiratzka; George L Bakris; Joshua A Beckman; Robert M Bersin; Vincent F Carr; Donald E Casey; Kim A Eagle; Luke K Hermann; Eric M Isselbacher; Ella A Kazerooni; Nicholas T Kouchoukos; Bruce W Lytle; Dianna M Milewicz; David L Reich; Souvik Sen; Julie A Shinn; Lars G Svensson; David M Williams
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  CT and MRI assessment of the aortic root and ascending aorta.

Authors:  Laura A Freeman; Phillip M Young; Thomas A Foley; Eric E Williamson; Charles J Bruce; Kevin L Greason
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Measuring the aorta in the era of multimodality imaging: still to be agreed.

Authors:  Elena Díaz-Peláez; Manuel Barreiro-Pérez; Ana Martín-García; Pedro L Sanchez
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Epidemiology of thoracic aortic dissection.

Authors:  Scott A LeMaire; Ludivine Russell
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  A prospective study of growth and rupture risk of small-to-moderate size ascending aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Sarah Geisbüsch; Angelina Stefanovic; Deborah Schray; Irina Oyfe; Hung-Mo Lin; Gabriele Di Luozzo; Randall B Griepp
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Proximal thoracic aortic diameter measurements at CT: repeatability and reproducibility according to measurement method.

Authors:  Leslie E Quint; Peter S Liu; Anna M Booher; Kuanwong Watcharotone; James D Myles
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  MRI Manufacturer Shift and Adaptation: Increasing the Generalizability of Deep Learning Segmentation for MR Images Acquired with Different Scanners.

Authors:  Wenjun Yan; Lu Huang; Liming Xia; Shengjia Gu; Fuhua Yan; Yuanyuan Wang; Qian Tao
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2020-07-01

9.  Variable generalization performance of a deep learning model to detect pneumonia in chest radiographs: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  John R Zech; Marcus A Badgeley; Manway Liu; Anthony B Costa; Joseph J Titano; Eric Karl Oermann
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 10.  SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python.

Authors:  Pauli Virtanen; Ralf Gommers; Travis E Oliphant; Matt Haberland; Tyler Reddy; David Cournapeau; Evgeni Burovski; Pearu Peterson; Warren Weckesser; Jonathan Bright; Stéfan J van der Walt; Matthew Brett; Joshua Wilson; K Jarrod Millman; Nikolay Mayorov; Andrew R J Nelson; Eric Jones; Robert Kern; Eric Larson; C J Carey; İlhan Polat; Yu Feng; Eric W Moore; Jake VanderPlas; Denis Laxalde; Josef Perktold; Robert Cimrman; Ian Henriksen; E A Quintero; Charles R Harris; Anne M Archibald; Antônio H Ribeiro; Fabian Pedregosa; Paul van Mulbregt
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 28.547

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.