Literature DB >> 33936960

Comparison of diametric and volumetric changes in Stanford type B aortic dissection patients in assessing aortic remodeling post-stent graft treatment.

Wan Naimah Wan Ab Naim1, Zhonghua Sun2, Yih Miin Liew3, Bee Ting Chan4, Shirley Jansen5,6,7, Jing Lei8, Poo Balan Ganesan9, Shahrul Amry Hashim10, Ganiga Srinivasaiah Sridhar11, Einly Lim3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The study aims to analyze the correlation between the maximal diameter (both axial and orthogonal) and volume changes in the true (TL) and false lumens (FL) after stent-grafting for Stanford type B aortic dissection.
METHOD: Computed tomography angiography was performed on 13 type B aortic dissection patients before and after procedure, and at 6 and 12 months follow-up. The lumens were divided into three regions: the stented area (Region 1), distal to the stent graft to the celiac artery (Region 2), and between the celiac artery and the iliac bifurcation (Region 3). Changes in aortic morphology were quantified by the increase or decrease of diametric and volumetric percentages from baseline measurements.
RESULTS: At Region 1, the TL diameter and volume increased (pre-treatment: volume =51.4±41.9 mL, maximal axial diameter =22.4±6.8 mm, maximal orthogonal diameter =21.6±7.2 mm; follow-up: volume =130.7±69.2 mL, maximal axial diameter =40.1±8.1 mm, maximal orthogonal diameter =31.9+2.6 mm, P<0.05 for all comparisons), while FL decreased (pre-treatment: volume =129.6±150.5 mL; maximal axial diameter =43.0±15.8 mm; maximal orthogonal diameter =28.3±12.6 mm; follow-up: volume =66.6±95.0 mL, maximal axial diameter =24.5±19.9 mm, maximal orthogonal diameter =16.9±13.7, P<0.05 for all comparisons). Due to the uniformity in size throughout the vessel, high concordance was observed between diametric and volumetric measurements in the stented region with 93% and 92% between maximal axial diameter and volume for the true/false lumens, and 90% and 92% between maximal orthogonal diameter and volume for the true/false lumens. Large discrepancies were observed between the different measurement methods at regions distal to the stent graft, with up to 46% differences between maximal orthogonal diameter and volume.
CONCLUSIONS: Volume measurement was shown to be a much more sensitive indicator in identifying lumen expansion/shrinkage at the distal stented region. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic dissection; aortic remodeling; computed tomography angiography; maximal diameter; volume

Year:  2021        PMID: 33936960      PMCID: PMC8047377          DOI: 10.21037/qims-20-814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  21 in total

1.  Changes in false lumen after transluminal stent-graft placement in aortic dissections: six years' experience.

Authors:  Hitoshi Kusagawa; Takatsugu Shimono; Masaki Ishida; Tomoaki Suzuki; Fuyuhiko Yasuda; Uhito Yuasa; Koji Onoda; Isao Yada; Tadanori Hirano; Kan Takeda; Noriyuki Kato
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  A comparison of balloon- and self-expanding stents.

Authors: 
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.442

3.  Aortic remodeling, volumetric analysis, and clinical outcomes of endoluminal exclusion of acute complicated type B thoracic aortic dissections.

Authors:  Karen M Kim; Carlos E Donayre; Tyler S Reynolds; George E Kopchok; Iwin Walot; Joe P Chauvapun; Rodney A White
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: analysis of aneurysm volumetric changes at mid-term follow-up.

Authors:  Irene Bargellini; Roberto Cioni; Pasquale Petruzzi; Alessandro Pratali; Vinicio Napoli; Claudio Vignali; Mauro Ferrari; Carlo Bartolozzi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Large false lumen area is a predictor of failed false lumen volume reduction after stent-graft repair in type B aortic dissection.

Authors:  Tae-Hoon Kim; Young-Guk Ko; Sung Woo Kwon; Donghoon Choi; Do Yun Lee; Won-Heum Shim; Min Su Hyon
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.487

6.  Maximal aneurysm diameter follow-up is inadequate after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  J J Wever; J D Blankensteijn; W P Th M Mali; B C Eikelboom
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.069

7.  Aortic remodeling in type B aortic dissection: effects of endovascular stent-graft repair and medical treatment on true and false lumen volumes.

Authors:  Sebastian Huptas; Rajendra H Mehta; Hilmar Kühl; Konstantinos Tsagakis; Nico Reinsch; Philipp Kahlert; Heinz G Jakob; Raimund Erbel; Holger Eggebrecht
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.487

8.  Aortic remodeling after endovascular repair of acute complicated type B aortic dissection.

Authors:  Mark F Conrad; Robert S Crawford; Christopher J Kwolek; David C Brewster; Thomas J Brady; Richard P Cambria
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Aortic remodeling after endografting of thoracoabdominal aortic dissection.

Authors:  Julio A Rodriguez; Dawn M Olsen; Leonardo Lucas; Grayson Wheatley; Venkatesh Ramaiah; Edward B Diethrich
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Serial CT volume and thrombus length measurements after endovascular repair of Stanford type B aortic dissection.

Authors:  Benedikt V Czermak; Ammar Mallouhi; Reinhold Perkmann; Iris E Steingruber; Peter Waldenberger; Beate Neuhauser; Gustav Fraedrich; Tarzis Jung; Werner R Jaschke
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.487

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.