Literature DB >> 33929612

A biomechanical comparison of a cement-augmented odontoid screw with a posterior-instrumented fusion in geriatric patients with an odontoid fracture type IIb.

Falko Schwarz1, Christian Liebsch2, Nikolaus Berger-Roscher2, Hans-Joachim Wilke3, Yasser Sakr4, Rolf Kalff1, Albrecht Waschke1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Possible surgical therapies for odontoid fracture type IIb include odontoid screw osteosynthesis (OG) with preservation of mobility or dorsal C1/2 fusion with restriction of cervical rotation. In order to reduce material loosening in odontoid screw osteosynthesis in patients with low bone density, augmentation at the base of the axis using bone cement has been established as a suitable alternative. In this study, we compared cement-augmented OG and C1/2 fusion according to Harms (HG).
METHODS: Body donor preparations of the 1st and 2nd cervical vertebrae were randomized in 2 groups (OG vs. HG). The range of motion (ROM) was determined in 3 principle motion plains. Subsequently, a cyclic loading test was performed. The decrease in height of the specimen and the double amplitude height were determined as absolute values as an indication of screw loosening. Afterward, the ROM was determined again and loosening of the screws was measured in a computed tomography.
RESULTS: A total of 16 were included. Two groups of 8 specimens (OG vs. HG) from patients with a median age of 80 (interquartile range (IQ) 73.5-85) years and a reduced bone density of 87.2 (IQ 71.2-104.5) mg/cc dipotassium hydrogen phosphate were examined for their biomechanical properties. Before and after exposure, the OG preparations were significantly more mobile. At the time of loading, the OG had similar loading properties to HG decrease in height of the specimen and the double amplitude height. Computed tomography revealed similar outcomes with regard to the screw loosening rate (62.5 vs. 87.5%, p = 0.586).
CONCLUSION: In patients with an odontoid fracture type IIb and reduced bone density, cement-augmented odontoid screw yielded similar properties in the loading tests compared to the HG. It may, therefore, be considered as a primary alternative to preserve cervical mobility in these patients.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanical; Cement augmented; Elderly; Odontoid fracture; Odontoid screw

Year:  2021        PMID: 33929612     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06848-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  22 in total

1.  Surgical versus nonsurgical management for type II odontoid fractures in the elderly population: a systematic review.

Authors:  Deep P Sarode; Andreas K Demetriades
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants.

Authors:  H J Wilke; K Wenger; L Claes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Cement augmented anterior odontoid screw fixation is biomechanically advantageous in osteoporotic patients with Anderson Type II fractures.

Authors:  Albrecht Waschke; Nikolaus Berger-Roscher; Heike Kielstein; Christian Ewald; Rolf Kalff; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2015-04

4.  A universal spine tester for in vitro experiments with muscle force simulation.

Authors:  H J Wilke; L Claes; H Schmitt; S Wolf
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Biomechanical evaluation of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty with polymethyl methacrylate or calcium phosphate cement under cyclic loading.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Wilke; Ulrich Mehnert; Lutz E Claes; Michael M Bierschneider; Hans Jaksche; Bronek M Boszczyk
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  A meta-analysis of the fusion rate from surgical treatment for odontoid factures: anterior odontoid screw versus posterior C1-C2 arthrodesis.

Authors:  Ye Shen; Jinhao Miao; Chao Li; Lei Fang; Samantha Cao; Ming Zhang; Jianhua Yan; Yong Kuang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Surgical management of acute odontoid fractures: surgery-related complications and long-term outcomes in a consecutive series of 97 patients.

Authors:  Syed Ali Mujtaba Rizvi; Hege Linnerud Fredø; Bjarne Lied; Per Hjalmar Nakstad; Pål Rønning; Eirik Helseth
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.313

8.  Posterior C1-C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation.

Authors:  J Harms; R P Melcher
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Proposal of a modified, treatment-oriented classification of odontoid fractures.

Authors:  Jonathan N Grauer; Bilal Shafi; Alan S Hilibrand; James S Harrop; Brian K Kwon; John M Beiner; Todd J Albert; Michael G Fehlings; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Primary posterior fusion C1/2 in odontoid fractures: indications, technique, and results of transarticular screw fixation.

Authors:  B Jeanneret; F Magerl
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1992-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.