BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The classification scheme of odontoid fractures described by Anderson and D'Alonzo is the one most commonly used. However, uncertainty exists in the distinction between Type II and "shallow" Type III fractures. Moreover, fractures at the base of the odontoid (Anderson and D'Alonzo Type II) include a spectrum of injury patterns. PURPOSE: To modify the Anderson and D'Alonzo classification of odontoid fractures based on current clinical treatment options. STUDY DESIGN: Proposal of a modified classification system for odontoid fractures. METHODS: A more precise distinction between Type II and III fractures based on the presence/absence of C1-C2 facet involvement is proposed. A modified classification of Type II fractures based on fracture line obliquity, displacement and comminution is then proposed, because these are factors deemed to influence management. To evaluate the reproducibility of this classification, 52 odontoid fractures were reviewed and classified by four attending spine surgeons and three spine fellows. RESULTS: There was substantial agreement (at least five of seven respondents) in 70% of cases. The overall kappa value for the modified classification system was 0.48, indicating moderate agreement, and there were no differences in kappa values between attending spine surgeons and fellows. CONCLUSIONS: The reproducibility of this system was demonstrated by the moderate agreement observed when applied to odontoid fractures at our institution. The proposed utility of this system is its ability to guide clinical decision making in the treatment of odontoid fractures. Prospective application of this modified classification system and suggested treatment options is now required.
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The classification scheme of odontoid fractures described by Anderson and D'Alonzo is the one most commonly used. However, uncertainty exists in the distinction between Type II and "shallow" Type III fractures. Moreover, fractures at the base of the odontoid (Anderson and D'Alonzo Type II) include a spectrum of injury patterns. PURPOSE: To modify the Anderson and D'Alonzo classification of odontoid fractures based on current clinical treatment options. STUDY DESIGN: Proposal of a modified classification system for odontoid fractures. METHODS: A more precise distinction between Type II and III fractures based on the presence/absence of C1-C2 facet involvement is proposed. A modified classification of Type II fractures based on fracture line obliquity, displacement and comminution is then proposed, because these are factors deemed to influence management. To evaluate the reproducibility of this classification, 52 odontoid fractures were reviewed and classified by four attending spine surgeons and three spine fellows. RESULTS: There was substantial agreement (at least five of seven respondents) in 70% of cases. The overall kappa value for the modified classification system was 0.48, indicating moderate agreement, and there were no differences in kappa values between attending spine surgeons and fellows. CONCLUSIONS: The reproducibility of this system was demonstrated by the moderate agreement observed when applied to odontoid fractures at our institution. The proposed utility of this system is its ability to guide clinical decision making in the treatment of odontoid fractures. Prospective application of this modified classification system and suggested treatment options is now required.
Authors: Heiko Koller; Frank Acosta; Mark Tauber; Elisabeth Komarek; Michael Fox; Mido Moursy; Wolfgang Hitzl; Herbert Resch Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2009-02-19 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Heiko Koller; Frank Acosta; Rosemarie Forstner; Juliane Zenner; Herbert Resch; Mark Tauber; Stefan Lederer; Alexander Auffarth; Wolfgang Hitzl Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2009-02-18 Impact factor: 3.134