Literature DB >> 17139224

Biomechanical evaluation of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty with polymethyl methacrylate or calcium phosphate cement under cyclic loading.

Hans-Joachim Wilke1, Ulrich Mehnert, Lutz E Claes, Michael M Bierschneider, Hans Jaksche, Bronek M Boszczyk.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: We developed a new method to simulating in vivo dynamic loading as closely as possible, which allows comparison of kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty, as well as augmentation materials.
OBJECTIVE: Special interest was given to calcium phosphate cement, which might fail due to its brittleness. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are, with limitations, 2 promising alternative techniques to augment osteoporotic vertebrae with polymethyl methacrylate or calcium phosphate cements. However, little is known about the fatigue characteristics of the treated vertebrae under cyclic loading.
METHODS: Twenty-four intact, osteoporotic bi-segmental human specimens were divided into 4 groups: (1) vertebroplasty with polymethyl methacrylate, (2) kyphoplasty with polymethyl methacrylate, (3) kyphoplasty with calcium phosphate cement, and (4) untreated control group. After augmentation of the middle vertebrae, all specimens underwent 100,000 cycles of eccentric loading during which the specimen revolved around its longitudinal axis. Pre-loading and post-loading radiographs, and subsidence measurements at different sites of the vertebrae were taken. The overall height was additionally determined every 20,000 cycles in the material testing machine. Finally, the specimens were cryosectioned to examine the cements.
RESULTS: Loss of height progressed with strong individual differences in all groups, with an increasing number of load cycles up to median values of 2.8 mm for both augmented groups and 4.2 mm for the nonaugmented group. At the center of the upper endplate, subsidence in kyphoplasty was greater than in vertebroplasty, with little differences with respect to the kind of cement. The cryosections did not show any signs of fatigue in the polymethyl methacrylate, but small cracks were in the calcium phosphate.
CONCLUSIONS: Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty seem to be equivalent methods in strengthening osteoporotic vertebrae. However, these results cannot be transferred to the treatment of fractures with these methods. A "physiologic" loading situation was achieved by complex motion, including all combinations of flexion/extension with lateral bending during eccentric cyclic loading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17139224     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000248423.28511.44

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  40 in total

1.  Treatment of typical amyelic somatic fractures with kyphoplasty and calcium phosphate cement: a critical analysis.

Authors:  G Gioia; D Mandelli; R Gogue
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  [Biomechanics of interspinous spacers].

Authors:  H-J Wilke; J Drumm; K Häussler; C Mack; A Kettler
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  [Filler materials for augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral fractures].

Authors:  M Arabmotlagh; M Rauschmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Prospective study of standalone balloon kyphoplasty with calcium phosphate cement augmentation in traumatic fractures (G. Maestretti et al.).

Authors:  Bronek Boszczyk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  [Stabilization of the osteoporotic spine from a biomechanical viewpoint].

Authors:  C-E Heyde; A Rohlmann; U Weber; R Kayser
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Demineralization after balloon kyphoplasty with calcium phosphate cement: a histological evaluation in ten patients.

Authors:  Rainer Gumpert; Koppany Bodo; Ekkehard Spuller; Thomas Poglitsch; Ronny Bindl; Anita Ignatius; Paul Puchwein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Construct stability of an instrumented 2-level cervical corpectomy model following fatigue testing: biomechanical comparison of circumferential antero-posterior instrumentation versus a novel anterior-only transpedicular screw-plate fixation technique.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Werner Schmoelz; Juliane Zenner; Alexander Auffarth; Herbert Resch; Wolfgang Hitzl; Davud Malekzadeh; Lukas Ernstbrunner; Martina Blocher; Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  [Biocompatibility of polymer-bioglass cement Cortoss®: in vitro test with the MG63 cell model].

Authors:  C Fölsch; R Pinkernell; R Stiletto
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Comparison of kyphoplasty and lordoplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

Authors:  Sang-Bum Kim; Taek-Soo Jeon; Woo-Suk Lee; Jae-Young Roh; Jae-Young Kim; Won-Ki Park
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2010-11-24

10.  Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty Can Restore Normal Spine Mechanics following Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture.

Authors:  Jin Luo; Michael A Adams; Patricia Dolan
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2010-06-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.