| Literature DB >> 29057986 |
Tess Pallister1, Matthew A Jackson1, Tiphaine C Martin1, Jonas Zierer1,2, Amy Jennings3, Robert P Mohney4, Alexander MacGregor3, Claire J Steves1, Aedin Cassidy3, Tim D Spector1, Cristina Menni5.
Abstract
Reduced gut microbiome diversity is associated with multiple disorders including metabolic syndrome (MetS) features, though metabolomic markers have not been investigated. Our objective was to identify blood metabolite markers of gut microbiome diversity, and explore their relationship with dietary intake and MetS. We examined associations between Shannon diversity and 292 metabolites profiled by the untargeted metabolomics provider Metabolon Inc. in 1529 females from TwinsUK using linear regressions adjusting for confounders and multiple testing (Bonferroni: P < 1.71 × 10-4). We replicated the top results in an independent sample of 420 individuals as well as discordant identical twin pairs and explored associations with self-reported intakes of 20 food groups. Longitudinal changes in circulating levels of the top metabolite, were examined for their association with food intake at baseline and with MetS at endpoint. Five metabolites were associated with microbiome diversity and replicated in the independent sample. Higher intakes of fruit and whole grains were associated with higher levels of hippurate cross-sectionally and longitudinally. An increasing hippurate trend was associated with reduced odds of having MetS (OR: 0.795[0.082]; P = 0.026). These data add further weight to the key role of the microbiome as a potential mediator of the impact of dietary intake on metabolic status and health.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29057986 PMCID: PMC5651863 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-13722-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Metabolites associated with Shannon diversity in the discovery sample (following backward stepwise linear regression) and in the validation sample1.
| Metabolite | Super-pathway | Sub-pathway | Discovery ( | Validation ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| beta (SE) |
| beta (SE) |
| |||
| Hippurate | Xenobiotics | Benzoate metabolism | 0.230 (0.040) | 3.72 × 10−8 | 0.238 (0.072) | 0.001* |
| p-cresol sulfate | Amino acid | Phenylalanine & tyrosine metabolism | 0.200 (0.040) | 9.90 × 10−8 | 0.179 (0.063) | 0.005* |
| phenol sulfate | Amino acid | Phenylalanine & tyrosine metabolism | −0.200 (0.040) | 5.82 × 10−7 | −0.121 (0.063) | 0.055 |
| Phenylacetylglutamine | Amino acid | Phenylalanine & tyrosine metabolism | 0.180 (0.040) | 5.21 × 10−6 | 0.195 (0.062) | 0.002* |
| 3-phenylpropionate (hydrocinnamate) | Amino acid | Phenylalanine & tyrosine metabolism | 0.160 (0.040) | 3.43 × 10−5 | 0.185 (0.084) | 0.028* |
| 4-ethylphenylsulfate | Xenobiotics | Benzoate metabolism | 0.190 (0.050) | 5.12 × 10−5 | 0.062 (0.081) | 0.441 |
| Hyodeoxycholate | Lipid | Bile acid metabolism | −0.190 (0.050) | 8.66 × 10−5 | −0.215 (0.089) | 0.016* |
| Indolepropionate | Amino acid | Tryptophan metabolism | 0.140 (0.040) | 9.20 × 10−5 | 0.093 (0.083) | 0.262 |
*Statistically significant: P < 0.05.
1A linear regression was performed using Shannon diversity to predict levels of 292 metabolites adjusting for age, BMI, batch effects (and sex in the validation) and family relatedness.
2Statistically significant (P < 1.71 × 10−4) associations from the discovery group were validated in the validation group.
Figure 1OTU and collapsed taxonomic associations with hippurate. Associations between blood hippurate and microbiome variables are represented the histogram bars on the right side of the plot. The histogram bars represent the −log10 of the P-value of the regression and the colour of the bars indicates the direction of association: green, positive; red, negative.
List of taxa associated with hippurate, the hippurate diet score and foods1.
| Phylum | Class | Order | Family | Genus species | OTU/Collapsed2 | Hippurate | Diet score | Foods3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (SE) |
| Beta (SE) |
|
| ||||||
| Actinobacteria | Actinobacteria | Actinomycetales | Collapsed | −0.083(0.022) | 1.31 × 10−4 | −0.035(0.011) | 1.67 × 10−3 | Fruit: −0.004(0.002) WG: −0.007(0.003) | ||
| Actinobacteria | Actinobacteria | Actinomycetales | Actinomycetaceae | Collapsed | −0.089(0.021) | 2.89 × 10−5 | −0.036(0.011) | 1.70 × 10−3 | Fruit: −0.004(0.002) WG: −0.007(0.003) | |
| Actinobacteria | Actinobacteria | Actinomycetales | Actinomycetaceae |
| Collapsed | −0.101(0.021) | 1.55 × 10−6 | −0.045(0.011) | 5.71 × 10−5 | Fruit: −0.005(0.002) WG: −0.008(0.003) |
| Actinobacteria | Actinobacteria | Actinomycetales | Actinomycetaceae |
| OTU | −0.099(0.022) | 5.14 × 10−6 | −0.051(0.011) | 2.81 × 10−6 | Fruit: −0.005(0.002) WG: −0.009(0.003) |
| Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | OTU | 0.113(0.024) | 2.21 × 10−6 | 0.044(0.010) | 9.76 × 10−6 | Coffee: 0.013(0.002)* | ||
| Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Lachnospiraceae |
| Collapsed | −0.111(0.022) | 4.03 × 10−7 | −0.038(0.011) | 6.35 × 10−4 | Fruit: −0.005(0.002) WG: −0.008(0.003) |
| Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Lachnospiraceae |
| OTU | −0.123(0.021) | 1.17 × 10−8 | −0.054(0.011) | 2.79 × 10−6 | Fruit: −0.006(0.002)* WG: −0.009(0.003) |
| Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Lachnospiraceae |
| OTU | −0.107(0.023) | 3.04 × 10−6 | −0.064(0.011) | 1.99 × 10−8 | Fruit: −0.006(0.002)* WG: −0.009(0.003) |
| Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Ruminococcaceae |
| OTU | 0.100(0.023) | 1.66 × 10−5 | 0.034(0.010) | 9.24 × 10−4 | WG: 0.007(0.003) |
| Firmicutes | Erysipelotrichi | Erysipelotrichales | Erysipelotrichaceae |
| Collapsed | −0.083(0.021) | 9.30 × 10−5 | −0.040(0.012) | 6.12 × 10−4 | Fruit: −0.004(0.002) WG: −0.010(0.003)* |
*Statistically significant: P < 0.0017; WG: whole grain products.
1Microbiome OTUs and collapsed taxa significantly associated with both hippurate and the hippurate diet score (quartile-ranked, scored and summed intakes of coffee, fruit and whole grains) are shown. Associations were adjusted for covariates (age, Shannon Index, metabolite batch, BMI, sex and family relatedness) and multiple testing using Bonferroni correction. Hippurate diet score associations were also adjusted for hippurate.
2OTU or collapsed taxonomy.
3All foods included in the hippurate diet score were fitted into a backwards stepwise linear regression using P < 0.05 as the cut-off threshold with each taxa associated to both hippurate and the diet score. Results displayed are the betas with standard errors of foods at least nominally associated (P < 0.05). Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.0017 (Bonferroni: 0.05/[10 taxa × 3 foods]).
Figure 2Associations between diversity, the hippurate trend, diet and OTUs and collapsed taxa with MetS status. (a) Shows the associations between MetS with Shannon diversity, the hippurate trend, and OTUs/taxa (significantly associated with hippurate, the diet score and MetS) represented as betas with SEs; all variables have been standardized. The diet score was not significantly associated with MetS. (b) Shows the percentage variance in the metabolite trend and MetS that was accounted for by the MetS association with Shannon diversity or associated OTUs/taxa. Abbreviations: MetS, metabolic syndrome; OTU, operational taxonomic unit; NA, not applicable.
Figure 3Overview of the study datasets and flow chart of study design. (a) Provides an overview of the study datasets. There were 5 different datasets used in the study. The colors and outline of the boxes indicate the datasets used; color: blue, whole; green, discovery; orange, validation; outline: solid, whole; dashed, subsample. All individuals included in the study had FFQ, blood metabolomics and microbiome data available. For part 1 cross-sectional analyses the whole sample was divided into discovery and validation groups based on when FFQs were completed. A subsample of individuals from the discovery group were used to examine baseline diet associations with longitudinal blood metabolomics. For part 2 analysis a subsample of individuals from the whole dataset were used to examine MetS associations with longitudinal metabolomics and cross-sectional diet and microbiome. (b) Shows the study outline for part 1 of the analysis where metabolite markers of microbiome diversity were identified and their relationship to diet examined. The flow chart is numbered in the order the analysis was conducted. On the left side of the figure the datasets used for each analysis step are indicated. (c) Shows the study outline for part 2 analysis where longitudinal levels of the top metabolite marker were examined for its relationship with MetS. Shannon diversity, the diet score, and metabolite- and diet-associated OTUs/taxa were investigated for their association with MetS status cross-sectionally.Abbreviations: MetS, metabolic syndrome; NA, not applicable.