| Literature DB >> 33924046 |
Andreea Teodora Iacob1, Florentina Geanina Lupascu1, Maria Apotrosoaei1, Ioana Mirela Vasincu1, Roxana Georgiana Tauser1, Dan Lupascu1, Simona Eliza Giusca2, Irina-Draga Caruntu2, Lenuta Profire1.
Abstract
In recent decades, drug delivery systems (DDSs) based on nanotechnology have been attracting substantial interest in the pharmaceutical field, especially those developed based on natural polymers such as chitosan, cellulose, starch, collagen, gelatin, alginate and elastin. Nanomaterials based on chitosan (CS) or chitosan derivatives are broadly investigated as promising nanocarriers due to their biodegradability, good biocompatibility, non-toxicity, low immunogenicity, great versatility and beneficial biological effects. CS, either alone or as composites, are suitable substrates in the fabrication of different types of products like hydrogels, membranes, beads, porous foams, nanoparticles, in-situ gel, microparticles, sponges and nanofibers/scaffolds. Currently, the CS based nanocarriers are intensely studied as controlled and targeted drug release systems for different drugs (anti-inflammatory, antibiotic, anticancer etc.) as well as for proteins/peptides, growth factors, vaccines, small DNA (DNAs) and short interfering RNA (siRNA). This review targets the latest biomedical approaches for CS based nanocarriers such as nanoparticles (NPs) nanofibers (NFs), nanogels (NGs) and chitosan coated liposomes (LPs) and their potential applications for medical and pharmaceutical fields. The advantages and challenges of reviewed CS based nanocarriers for different routes of administration (oral, transmucosal, pulmonary and transdermal) with reference to classical formulations are also emphasized.Entities:
Keywords: chitosan; drug delivery systems; liposomes; nanocarriers; nanofibers; nanogels; nanoparticles
Year: 2021 PMID: 33924046 PMCID: PMC8073149 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13040587
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Figure 1CS derivatives resulted by chemical modification of CS.
Figure 2CS based nanocarriers for biomedical applications.
Figure 3Representation of the main CS based nano-materials with biomedical applications.
The most important characteristics of different CS-NPs (selection).
| CS-NPs | NPs Size | DLE | DR | Mw/DD | ZP | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insulin | 534 ± 24 | 80 ± 3.96% | 14%(pH 2) | CS LMw | 14.57 ± 1.1 | [ |
| Docetaxel solid-lipid CS-NPs | 235 ± 4.2 | 94 ± 3.1% | 84 ± 3.1% (donor: acceptor lipid-1:25) | CS HMw | 29.0 ± 3.5 | [ |
| Sodium ceftriaxone | 265 ± 3.5 | 79 ± 0.9% | 52% (after 24 h) | CS MMw | 45.27 ± 2.1 | [ |
| Dexketoprofen- | 726.8 ± 16.8 | 732 ±1.2% | 93.10 ± 7.07% | CS LMw | 53.3 ± 2.2 | [ |
| Erlotinib | 170.2 ± 2.9 | 74.45 ± 0.3% | 89.46% | CS LMw | 16.2 ± 1.2 | [ |
| Simvastatin CS-NPs | 113 ± 4.9 | 97.70 ± 0.1% | 98.60% ± 0.40% | CS LMw | 40.80 ± 0.1 | [ |
| Sumatriptan succinate CS-NPs | 105 ± 10.1 | 59.60 ± 2.1% | 68.03 ± 3.98% | CS LMw | 21.5 ± 1.0 | [ |
* unspecified.
The most important characteristics of different CS-NFs (selection).
| CS-NFs | DC | DR (%) | Mw/DD of CS | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donepezil | 5 mg in 40 mg CS and 125 mg PVA | 97% (after 10 min) | CS LMw | [ |
| Ranitidine hydrochloride CS/PEO-NFs | 0.15 mg/mL polymeric solution | 40% (pH-responsive, burst release after 2 h) | CS MMw | [ |
| Naproxen CS-NFs | 30% of the membrane mass | 90% (burst release | CS LMw | [ |
| Sumatriptan succinate CS-NFs | 20% of the membrane mass | 90% (burst release | CS LMw | [ |
| Tetracycline hydrochloride CS/PVA-NFs | 3 μg/mL at 2 mg NFs | 80% (burst release after 2 h) | CS MMw | [ |
| Cisplatin CS-NFs | 98.6 ± 1% | 30% (burst release, after 10 days) | CS HMw | [ |
| N-IpaD antigen CS-NFs | 64.7 ± 14.3% | 99% (after 2.5 h) | CS HMw | [ |
* unspecified.
The most important characteristics of different CS-NGs (selection).
| CS-NGs | DC/DLE (%) | DR (%) | Mw/DD of CS | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myricetin CS-NGs | 1.33 mg/mL of polymeric mass | 83% (after 4 h, pH 1.2) | CS LMw | [ |
| Triclosan/ | DLE: Triclosan (93.67 ± 3.51%), Flurbiprofen (96.33 ± 2.08%) | 80% (burst release | CS MMw | [ |
| Doxorubicin | 0.5 mg/mL with DLE of 71.84 ± 3.1 % | 200 ng/mL in vivo release in | CS LMw, 10 kDa DD 89%; | [ |
| Doxorubicin | 2 mg/mL with DLE of 78 ± 3.1 | 23% (pH 6.8) and 8% (pH 7.4) | Gly CS Mw | [ |
| 5-Fluororuacil CS/PLGA-NGs | DLE of 39 ± 0.2% in CS-NGs | 25–30% (pH 7.0), after 24 h | CS MMw | [ |
| Bleomycin CS-NGs | DLE of 54.0 ± 0.95% in CS-NGs | 35% (pH 7.0), 55% (pH 4.0), | CS MMw | [ |
* unspecified.
The most important characteristics of different CS-LPs (selection).
| CS-LPs | LPs Size (nm) | DLE | DR | Mw/DD | ZP (mV) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curcumin | 54.1 ± 2.4 | 8.08 ± 0.18% | 13.1% (after 12 h) | CMCS Mw | 26.3 ± 2.3 | [ |
| Glutathion/Ferulic acid CS-LPs | 460.3 ± 6.0 | Gluthation: 61.32 ± 1.32; Ferrulic acid: | - | CS LMw | 57.7 ± 1.3 | [ |
| N acetyl Cys CS-LPs (DPPG 5% CS: lipid ratio 1:1) | 610.08 ± 8.3 | 74 ± 1.73% | 38% (after 7 h) | CS Mw | 38.1 ± 0.9 | [ |
| Acteoside CS-LPs | 92.77 ± 2.99 | 88.10 ± 5.36% | 54.82% (after 4 h) | CS LMw | 19.65 ± 0.9 | [ |
| Triamcinolone acetonide | 100.3 ± 6.8 | 98 ± 5.36% | - | CS LMw | 31.2 ± 0.8 | [ |
| Curcumin thiolated CS-LPs | 406.0 ± 12.0 | 93.95 ± 3.94% | 40.39% (pH 5.5, after 12 h); | CS MMw, | 36.6 ± 0.6 | [ |
* unspecified.
Figure 4Representation of the main advantages of the transmucosal DDSs.
Recent data on CS-based electrospun NFs used as transdermal nanocarriers.
| Formulation | Active Substance/ | Applications | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| CS/PEO electrospun wound scaffold | wound dressing | [ | |
| biomimetic nanocomposite scaffolds based on surface modified PCL-CS/gelatin NFs | Curcumin | skin regeneration | [ |
| CS/PEO NFs | Bromelain | burn wound healing in animal model | [ |
| electrospun CS/PVA/bioglass nanofibrous membrane |
| wound dressings for promoting healing of chronic wounds | [ |
| electrospun PLA CS core-shell NFs | Curcumin | wound dressing and drug delivery | [ |
| composite aliphatic copolyamide /PEO/CS based on Chitin/CS-NFs | Chitin nanofibrils | wound dressing for treatment of third-degree burns | [ |
| HA coated electrospun CS/PEO-based NFs |
| tissue engineering | [ |
| bilayer CS NF scaffold based on mammalian gelatin and fish collagen | wound healing in a rat model | [ | |
| PEO-CS-NFs | Ciprofloxacin, zinc oxide | burn wounds management | [ |
| electrospun PVA-CS based NF mats | antimicrobial wound dressings | [ | |
| CS/alginate nanofibrous wound dressing | Gentamicin | drug delivery systems and skin regeneration | [ |
| CS/PVANFs | Silk protein sericin | wound dressing | [ |
| reinforced CS-NFs | nanocrystals of cellulose -graft-poly ( | skin tissue engineering | [ |