| Literature DB >> 33923389 |
Barbara Kot1, Agata Grużewska2, Piotr Szweda3, Jolanta Wicha4, Urszula Parulska1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine antibiotic resistance patterns and the prevalence of uropathogenes causing urinary tract infections (UTIs) in patients hospitalized in January-June 2020 in central Poland. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the disk-diffusion method. Escherichia coli (52.2%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (13.7%), Enterococcus faecalis (9.3%), E. faecium (6.2%), and Proteus mirabilis (4,3%) were most commonly isolated from urine samples. E. coli was significantly more frequent in women (58.6%) (p = 0.0089) and in the age group 0-18, while K. pneumoniae was more frequent in men (24.4%) (p = 0.0119) and in individuals aged 40-60 and >60. Gram-negative species showed resistance to ampicillin. K. pneumoniae were resistant to amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid (75.0%), piperacillin plus tazobactam (76.2%), cefotaxime (76.2%), cefuroxime (81.0%), ciprofloxacin (81.0%), and trimethoprim plus sulphamethoxazole (81.0%). Carbapenems were effective against all E. coli and P. mirabilis. Some K. pneumoniae (13.6%) produced metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs). E. coli (22.6%), K. pneumoniae (81.8%), and all E. faecium were multidrug-resistant (MDR). Some E. coli (26.2%), K. pneumoniae (63.6%), and P. mirabilis (14.3%) isolates produced extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL). Vancomycin-resistant E. faecium was also found. This study showed that the possibilities of UTIs therapy using available antibiotics become limited due to the increasing number of antibiotic-resistant uropathogens.Entities:
Keywords: Enterococcus faecium; Escherichia coli; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Proteus mirabilis; resistance to antibiotics; urinary tract infection; uropathogenes
Year: 2021 PMID: 33923389 PMCID: PMC8071495 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10040447
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6382
Positive urine cultures according to hospital ward, age, and gender of patients.
| Characteristics |
| % |
|---|---|---|
| Hospital Ward | ||
| Nephrology | 52 | 32.3 |
| Neurological | 40 | 24.8 |
| Pediatric | 25 | 15.5 |
| Internal | 25 | 15.5 |
| Intensive care | 5 | 3.1 |
| Orthopedics | 5 | 3.1 |
| Gynecology | 4 | 2.5 |
| Surgery | 3 | 1.9 |
| Dialysis station | 2 | 1.2 |
| Age | ||
| 0–18 | 25 | 15.5 |
| 19–39 | 9 | 5.6 |
| 40–60 | 9 | 5.6 |
| >60 | 118 | 73.3 |
| Gender | ||
| Female | 116 | 72.0 |
| Male | 45 | 28.0 |
Distribution of microorganisms isolated from urine samples.
| Microorganisms |
| % |
|---|---|---|
|
| 84 | 52.2 |
|
| 22 | 13.7 |
|
| 15 | 9.3 |
|
| 10 | 6.2 |
|
| 7 | 4.3 |
|
| 6 | 3.7 |
|
| 3 | 1.9 |
|
| 2 | 1.2 |
|
| 2 | 1.2 |
|
| 2 | 1.2 |
|
| 1 | 0.6 |
|
| 1 | 0.6 |
|
| 1 | 0.6 |
|
| 1 | 0.6 |
|
| 1 | 0.6 |
|
| 1 | 0.6 |
|
| 1 | 0.6 |
| 1 | 0.6 |
The occurrence of the most common uropathogens in women and men hospitalized in different hospital wards.
| Uropathogens | Female ( | Male ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Occurrence of Uropathogens | |||
|
| 68 (58.6) | 16 (35.5) | 0.0089 ** |
|
| 11 (9.5) | 11 (24.4) | 0.0119 * |
|
| 5 (4.3) | 2 (4.4) | - |
|
| 11 (9.5) | 4 (8.8) | - |
|
| 6 (5.2) | 4 (8.8) | 0.3434 |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 (χ2 test).
The prevalence of major uropathogens in different age groups of hospitalized patients.
| Age Groups | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uropathogens | 0–18 | 19–39 | 40–60 | >60 | Comparison of: | ||
| Occurrence of Uropathogenes, | A and B | A and C | A and D | ||||
|
| 23 (92.0) | 5 (55.5) | 3 (33.3) | 53 (44.9) | 0.0164 * | 0.0004 ** | <0.0001 ** |
|
| 0 | 1 (11.1) | 2 (22.2) | 18 (15.2) | 0.0973 | 0.0173 * | 0.0393 * |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 (5.9) | - | - | 0.2106 |
|
| 0 | 2 (22.2) | 2 (22.2) | 11 (9.3) | 0.0173 * | 0.0173 * | 0.1203 |
|
| 1 (4.2) | 1 (11.1) | 1 (11.1) | 7 (5.9) | 0.4498 | 0.4498 | 0.6950 |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 (χ2 test).
The prevalence of major uropathogens in different hospital wards.
| Uropathogens | Hospital Ward | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nephrology ( | Pediatric ( | Neurological ( | Internal ( | Orthopedics ( | |
| Occurrence of Uropathogenes, | |||||
|
| 21 (40.4) | 23 (92.0) | 21 (52.5) | 12 (48.0) | 3 (60.0) |
|
| 14 (26.9) | 0 | 3 (7.5) | 4 (16.0) | 0 |
|
| 2 (3.8) | 0 | 2 (5.0) | 1 (4.0) | 0 |
|
| 7 (13.5) | 0 | 3 (7.5) | 3 (12.0) | 1 (20.0) |
|
| 3 (5.7) | 1 (4.0) | 3 (7.5) | 3 (12.0) | 0 |
Antimicrobial resistance of Gram-negative bacteria isolated from urine culture of hospitalized patients from January to June 2020.
| Antimicrobial Group | Antimicrobials |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Resistant Isolates | ||||
| Penicillins | Ampicillin | 53.4 | 100 | 83.3 |
| AMC | 34.3 | 75.0 | 60.0 | |
| TZP | 13.2 | 76.2 | 33.3 | |
| Cephalosporins 2nd G | Cefuroxime | 32.9 | 81.0 | 16.7 |
| Cephalosporins 3rd G | Cefotaxime | 31.5 | 76.2 | 16.7 |
| Carbapenems | Ertapenemem | 0.0 | 13.6 | 0.0 |
| Imipenem | 0.0 | 13.6 | 0.0 | |
| Meropenemem | 0.0 | 13.6 | 0.0 | |
| Fluoroquinolones | Ciprofloxacin | 28.6 | 81.0 | 83.3 |
| Aminoglycosides | Amikacin | 9.7 | 19.0 | 33.3 |
| Gentamicin | 24.6 | 19.0 | 40.0 | |
| Sulfonamides | SXT | 30.1 | 81.0 | 66.7 |
| Nitrofurans | Nitrofurantoin | 7.8 | - | - |
AMC—amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid, TZP—piperacillin plus tazobactam, SXT—trimethoprim plus sulphamethoxazole, “-” not tested; the most effective antibiotics marked in red, the least effective antibiotics in green.
Antimicrobial resistance of Gram-positive bacteria isolated from urine culture of hospitalized patients from January to June 2020.
| Antimicrobial Group | Antimicrobials |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| % Resistant Isolates | |||
| Penicillins | Ampicillin | 7.7 | 100 |
| Carbapenems | Imipenem | 0.0 | 100 |
| Fluoroquinolones | Ciprofloxacin | 36.4 | 100 |
| Aminoglycosides | Gentamicin | 38.5 | 40 |
| Glycopeptides | Vancomycin | 0.0 | 40 |
| Sulfonamides | SXT | 46.2 | 100 |
SXT—trimethoprim plus sulphamethoxazole; the most effective antibiotics marked in red.
Occurrence of ESBL-positive uropathogens in patients hospitalized in different hospital wards.
| Uropathogens ( | No. (%) of ESBL-Positive Isolates | Hospital Wards ( |
|---|---|---|
| 22 (26.2) | Nephrology (8, 30.1), neurological (5, 23.8), internal (4, 33.3), pediatric (4, 17.4), orthopedics (1, 33.3) | |
| 14 (63.6) | Nephrology (12, 85.7), internal (1, 25.0), dialysis station (1, 100) | |
| 1 (14.3) | Nephrology (1, 50.0) |
Multi-drug resistance pattern of Gram-negative bacteria isolated from urine culture of hospitalized patients from January to June 2020.
| Combination of Drugs (No. of Antimicrobial Agents Classes) | No. of Isolates | Resistance Mechanism ( | Hospital Wards ( |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| AMP, AMC, GM, SXT (3) | 1 | - | Neurological |
| AMP, CXM, CTX, F, GM (3) | 1 | ESBL | Neurological |
| AMP, CXM, CTX, AMC, CIP, SXT (3) | 2 | ESBL (2) | Internal, nephrology |
| AMP, CXM, CTX, TZP, AMC, GM, CIP (3) | 1 | ESBL | Internal |
| AMP, CXM, CTX, AMC, F, SXT (3) | 1 | ESBL | Pediatric |
| AMP, CXM, CTX, CIP, SXT (3) | 1 | ESBL | Internal |
| AMP, CXM, CTX, TZP, AMC, AK, GM, CIP (3) | 1 | ESBL | Nephrology |
| AMP, CXM, CTX, TZP, AMC, AK, GM, SXT (3) | 1 | ESBL | Neurological |
| GM, CIP, SXT (3) | 1 | - | Nephrology |
| AMP, CXM, TZP, AMC, F, GM, SXT (4) | 1 | - | Nephrology |
| AMP, CXM, CTX, AMC, GM, CIP, SXT (4) | 3 | ESBL (3) | Nephrology (2), pediatric |
| AMP, CXM, CTX, TZP, AMC, GM, CIP, SXT (4) | 2 | ESBL (2) | Nephrology, neurological |
| AMP, CXM, CTX, GM, CIP, SXT (4) | 1 | ESBL | Pediatric |
| AMP, CXM, CTX, AMC, F, GM, CIP, SXT (5) | 1 | ESBL | Internal |
| AMP, CXM, CTX, TZP, AMC, F, AK, GM, CIP, SXT (5) | 1 | ESBL | Internal |
|
| |||
| AMP, CIP, SXT (3) | 1 | - | Internal |
| AMP, CXM, CTX, CIP, SXT (3) | 1 | - | Neurological |
| AMP, CXM, CTX, TZP, AMC, CIP, SXT (3) | 8 | ESBL | Nephrology (7), dialysis station (1) |
| AMP, CXM, CTX, IMP, MEM, ETP, TZP, AMC, CIP, SXT (3) | 1 | MBL | Nephrology |
| AMP, CXM, CTX, TZP, AMC, AK, CIP, SXT (4) | 2 | ESBL | Nephrology |
| AMP, CXM, CTX, TZP, AMC, GM, CIP, SXT (4) | 3 | ESBL | Nephrology (2), internal (1) |
| AMP, CXM, CTX, IMP, MEM, ETP, TZP, AMC, AK, CIP, SXT(4) | 1 | MBL | Internal |
| AMP, CXM, CTX, IMP, MEM, ETP, TZP, AMC, AK, GM, CIP, SXT (4) | 1 | MBL | Internal |
AMP—ampicillin, AMC—amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid, TZP—piperacillin plus tazobactam, CXM—cefuroxime, CTX—cefotaxime, ETP—ertapenemem, IMP—imipenem, MEM—meropenemem, CIP—ciprofloxacin, AMK—amikacin, GM—gentamicin, SXT—trimethoprim plus sulphamethoxazole, F—nitrofurantoin.
Multi-drug resistance pattern of Gram-positive bacteria isolated from urine culture of hospitalized patients from January to June 2020.
| Combination of Antibiotics (No. of Antimicrobial Agent Classes) | No. of Isolates | Resistance Mechanism | Hospital Wards ( |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| AMP, IMP, CIP, SXT (3) | 2 | - | Neurological |
| AMP, IMP, CIP, VA, SXT (4) | 2 | VRE | Nephrology, neurological |
| AMP, IMP, CIP, GM, SXT (4) | 4 | - | Internal (2), nephrology, pediatric |
| AMP, IMP, CIP, F, VA, SXT (5) | 1 | VRE | Internal |
| AMP, IMP, CIP, GM, VA, SXT (5) | 1 | VRE | Nephrology |
|
| |||
| GM, CIP, SXT (3) | 4 | - | Nephrology (2), internal (1), orthopedics (1) |
| AMP, GM, CIP, SXT (4) | 1 | - | Internal |
AMP—ampicillin, IMP—imipenem, CIP—ciprofloxacin, GM—gentamicin, SXT—trimethoprim plus sulphamethoxazole, F—nitrofurantoin, VA—vancomycin, VRE—vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus.