| Literature DB >> 28861072 |
Maria E Terlizzi1, Giorgio Gribaudo1, Massimo E Maffei1.
Abstract
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most common pathological conditions in both community and hospital settings. It has been estimated that about 150 million people worldwide develop UTI each year, with high social costs in terms of hospitalizations and medical expenses. Among the common uropathogens associated to UTIs development, UroPathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) is the primary cause. UPEC strains possess a plethora of both structural (as fimbriae, pili, curli, flagella) and secreted (toxins, iron-acquisition systems) virulence factors that contribute to their capacity to cause disease, although the ability to adhere to host epithelial cells in the urinary tract represents the most important determinant of pathogenicity. On the opposite side, the bladder epithelium shows a multifaceted array of host defenses including the urine flow and the secretion of antimicrobial substances, which represent useful tools to counteract bacterial infections. The fascinating and intricate dynamics between these players determine a complex interaction system that needs to be revealed. This review will focus on the most relevant components of UPEC arsenal of pathogenicity together with the major host responses to infection, the current approved treatment and the emergence of resistant UPEC strains, the vaccine strategies, the natural antimicrobial compounds along with innovative anti-adhesive and prophylactic approaches to prevent UTIs.Entities:
Keywords: antibiotics; bladder; non-antibiotic remedies; urinary tract infections; uropathogenic Escherichia coli
Year: 2017 PMID: 28861072 PMCID: PMC5559502 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01566
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1The urinary tract and sites of infection.
Figure 2Escherichia coli adhesins and harboring/motile structures.
Figure 3The innate immune responses of bladder epithelium to bacterial infections. (A) The bladder epithelium; (B) adherent bacteria are internalized along with Rab27b+ fusiform vesicles; (C) exocytosis of RAB27b+ vesicles harboring UPEC and expulsion of the intracellular UPEC back into the lumen of the bladder; (D) transient receptor potential mucolipin 3 Ca2+ channel (TRPML3) triggers the spontaneous expulsion of the defective lysosomes and its contents out into the extracellular space; (E) soluble factors are also secreted by BECs, including antimicrobial peptides (AMP, such as cathelicidin and β-defensin 1), antimicrobial proteins [such as pentraxin 3 (PTX3)] and chemokines [such as CXC-chemokine ligand 1 (CXCL1) and CC-chemokine ligand 5 (CCR5)]. (F) Exfoliation is accompanied by rapid renewal of superficial BECs through active proliferation of basal progenitor mast cells. Intimate crosstalk between macrophages ensures the precise initiation of neutrophil responses.
Figure 4Structure formulae of some UPEC resistant and susceptible antibiotics. UPEC resistance is shown with a red background, susceptibility with a green background, whereas the yellow background shows antibiotics that already show resistance in some UPEC strains.
Figure 5Structure formulae of pilicide scaffold, some bioactive pilicides, and the curlicide FN075.
Figure 6Structure formulae of d-mannose and some bioactive mannosides.
Figure 7Structure formula of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3.
Figure 8Structure formulae of methenamine mandelate and hippurate.
Figure 9Structure formulae of some polymeric phenolics.
Figure 10Structure formulae of some non-polymeric phenolics.
Plant extracts with antimicrobial/antiadhesive activity against UPEC.
| Rhizome | None identified | None identified | Decreased bacterial adhesion | Interaction with bacterial outer membrane proteins | Rafsanjany et al., | ||
| Leaves and stem bark | Terpenoids, phenolics | Friedelane-3-one-28-al, stigmasta-4,22-dien-3-one, friedelin, 3-O-acetyl-aleuritolic acid, 3-O-acetyl-erythrodiol, methyl gallate | Antibacterial activity on ESBL-producing | None | Noundou et al., | ||
| Leaves | Terpenoid | Andrographolide | Inhibits LPS-induced iNOS and COX-2 proteins expression, production of nitrite, LPS-mediated TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 production | Negative regulation involving STAT3 phophorylation and NF-κB activation | Lee et al., | ||
| Leaves | Phenolics | Arbutin, hydroquinone conjugates | UTI control | Shrinking and tightening of mucous membranes | De Arriba et al., | ||
| Whole plant | None identified | None identified | Antibacterial Activity against MDR UPEC | None | Venkatadri et al., | ||
| Roots | Isothiocyanates | Benzyl-Isothiocyanate, Phenylethyl-Isothiocyanate | Intermediate susceptibility, | Possible damage in the cell membrane | Albrecht et al., | ||
| Not specified | Terpenoids | Uncharacterized sesquiterpene lactones | Biofilm modulating activity on UPEC | None | Vacheva et al., | ||
| Leaves | Phenolics | 1,3-benzodioxole,5,5-(tetrahydro-1H,3H-furo[3,4-c]furan-1,4-diyl)bis-,[1s-(1 alpha,3a alpha,4 beta,6a alpha)] | Antibacterial activity | None | Devi et al., | ||
| Leaves | Phenolics | 3,40-dihydroxypropiophenone-3-β- | Bactericidal activity | Modifications in the bacterial surface structures responsible for binding to the occupied surface | Wojnicz et al., | ||
| Hairy root, Root | None identified | None identified | Active against UPEC MDR strains | None | Sahu et al., | ||
| Leaves, flowers | Phenolics | Total phenols and flavonoids | Antibacterial activity | None | Vucic et al., | ||
| Seeds | None identified | None identified | Reduction of UPEC invasion | Decreased β1 integrin expression | Vollmerhausen et al., | ||
| Leaves | Phenolics | Ferulic acid, caffeic acid, quercetin, apigenin. | Antimicrobial activity | Correlation between the antioxidant and antimicrobial activity | Uliana et al., | ||
| Bark | None identified | None identified | Growth inhibition | None | Chandra and Gupta, | ||
| Rhizome | Phenolics | Curcumin | Antibiofilm activity, inhibition of swimming and swarming behavior, enhanced susceptibility of UPEC toward antibiotics | Reduction in biofilm morphology and thickness | Packiavathy et al., | ||
| Essential oils | Terpenoids | Myrcene, neral, geranial | Antimicrobial activity | None | Pereira et al., | ||
| Rhizome | Terpenoids | Saponins | Antibacterial activity | None | Sharma et al., | ||
| Leaves | Phenolics | Quercetin dihexoside, kaempherol dihexoside, kaempherol-dirhamnosyl-hexoside, protocatechuic acid, caftaric acid, ferulic acid, caffeic acid | Antimicrobial activity, inhibition of biofilm mass production, antiadhesive | Modifications in the bacterial surface structures responsible for binding to the occupied surface | Wojnicz et al., | ||
| Leaves | Phenolics | Protocatechuic acid, caffeoylquinic isomer, quercetin and kaempherol derivatives, iridoids | Weak antimicrobial activity | Modifications in the bacterial surface structures responsible for binding to the occupied surface | Wojnicz et al., | ||
| Leaves | Terpenoids, dammarane-type saponins | Gypenosides | Reduction of pro-inflammatory response of BECs to UPEC; modulation of antimicrobial peptides | NF-κB inhibition and ERK activation | Lüthje et al., | ||
| Leaves | Phenolics | Caffeoylquinic and feruloylquinic isomers, quercetin, kaempherol and isorhamnetin derivatives, iridoids, | High bactericidal activity, inhibition of biofilm mass production | Modifications in the bacterial surface structures responsible for binding to the occupied surface | Wojnicz et al., | ||
| Herbal | Phenolics | Gallic acid, anthocyanin | Induced uroepithelial apoptosis, reduces the number of intracellular UPEC in BECs | Increased levels of caveolin-1, reduced expression of β1 integrin | Fazliana et al., | ||
| Leaves | None identified | None identified | Decreases bacterial colonization of bladder epithelial cells, reduces phosphorylation of the focal adhesion kinase (FAK) | Inhibition of FAK significantly decreases bacterial adherence | Lüthje et al., | ||
| Essential oils | Terpenoids | 1,8 cineol, eugenol, methyl-eugenol, thymol, p-cimene, cis-ocimene, and cis-caryophyllene | Antimicrobial activity | None | Pereira et al., | ||
| Leaves | None identified | None identified | Antiadhesive effects | Direct interaction of compounds from the extract with the bacterial adhesins | Rafsanjany et al., | ||
| Root bark | None identified | Uncharacterized glycosides, tannins, saponins, alkaloids | Antibacterial activity | None | El-Mahmood and Ameh, | ||
| Seeds | None identified | None identified | Antibacterial Activity | None | Saeidi et al., | ||
| Not specified | Terpenoids | Uncharacterized mono-, sesqui-, tri-terpenoids | Biofilm modulating activity on UPEC | None | Vacheva et al., | ||
| Not specified | Terpenoids | Uncharacterized mono-, sesqui-, tri-terpenoids | Biofilm modulating activity on UPEC | None | Vacheva et al., | ||
| Leaves | Phenolics | Uncharacterized coumarins | Antibacterial activity | None | Petrolini et al., | ||
| Leaves | None identified | None identified | Modulatory activity, synergistic activity with antibiotic drugs | None | Tintino et al., | ||
| Whole plant | Terpenoids, phenolics | Tentative identification of gallic acid, quercitrin, catechin, flavonoids, triterpenoids, steroids | Anti-inflammatory, moderate antibacterial | None | Liao et al., | ||
| Seed | None identified | None identified | Antibacterial activity | None | Sharma et al., | ||
| Not specified | Phenolics | Uncharacterized flavonoids, proanthocyanidins, phenylpropanoids | Biofilm modulating activity on UPEC | None | Vacheva et al., | ||
| Leaves | Phenolics | rosmarinic acid | Antibacterial activity | None | Petrolini et al., | ||
| Essential oils | Terpenoids | 1,8-cineole | Antimicrobial activity | None | Pereira et al., | ||
| Whole plant | None identified | None identified | Diuretic activity, UPEC susceptibility | None | Peng et al., | ||
| Leaves | None identified | None identified | Antibacterial activity | None | Sittiwet et al., | ||
| Whole plant, leaves | Phenolics Alkaloids | Ulopetrol, Flindersine | Antibacterial Activity against MDR UPEC | None | Raj et al., | ||
| Leaves | Isothiocyanates | Benzyl-Isothiocyanate, Phenylethyl-Isothiocyanate | Intermediate susceptibility, | Possible damage in the cell membrane | Albrecht et al., | ||
| Leaves | Phenolics | Protocatechuic, ferulic, p-coumaric, and dicaffeoylquinic acids, | Antimicrobial activity, antiadhesive effects | Modifications in the bacterial surface structures responsible for binding to the occupied surface, direct interaction of compounds from the extract with the bacterial adhesins | Wojnicz et al., | ||
| Leaves | Phenolics | Quercetin derivatives, derivatives of caffeoylquinic, caffeoyl-hexose-hydroxyphenol and coumaroyl-hexose-hydroxyphenol acids, procyanidins (A and B dimers), iridoids | High bactericidal activity, inhibition of biofilm mass production | Modifications in the bacterial surface structures responsible for binding to the occupied surface | Wojnicz et al., | ||
| Leaves, stems | None identified | None identified | Antimicrobial activity | None | Uzoigwe and Agwa, | ||
| Stigmata | Phenolics | Derhamnosylmaysin, 3′-deoxyrhamnosylmaysin, 3′-O-methyl derhamnosylmaysin, apiferol, alternanthin | Decreased bacterial adhesion | Interaction with bacterial outer membrane proteins | Rafsanjany et al., | ||
| Rhizome | None identified | None identified | Antibacterial activity | None | Sharma et al., |
Figure 11Structure formulae of some representative bioactive compounds isolated from plant extracts exerting antimicrobial activity against UPEC listed in Table 1.
Figure 12The four main areas representing the Strengths and the Weaknesses of UPEC, the Opportunities for alternative remedies to antibiotics and, finally, the Treats that UPEC cause to human health.