| Literature DB >> 33921730 |
Simona Sipos1, Elena-Alina Moacă2,3, Ioana Zinuca Pavel3,4, Ştefana Avram3,4, Octavian Marius Crețu5, Dorina Coricovac2,3, Roxana-Marcela Racoviceanu3,6, Roxana Ghiulai3,6, Ramona Daniela Pană7, Codruţa Marinela Şoica3,6, Florin Borcan8, Cristina Adriana Dehelean2,3, Zorin Crăiniceanu9.
Abstract
Melissa officinalis (MO) is a medicinal plant well-known for its multiple pharmacological effects, including anti-inflammatory, anticancer and beneficial effects on skin recovery. In this context, the present study was aimed to investigate the in vitro and in vivo safety profile of an MO aqueous extract by assessing cell viability on normal (HaCaT-human keratinocytes) and tumor (A375-human melanoma) cells and its impact on physiological skin parameters by a non-invasive method. In addition, the antioxidant activity and the antiangiogenic potential of the extract were verified. A selective cytotoxic effect was noted in A375 cells, while no toxicity was noticed in healthy cells. The MO aqueous extract safety profile after topical application was investigated on SKH-1 mice, and an enhanced skin hydration and decreased erythema and transepidermal water loss levels were observed. The in ovo CAM assay, performed to investigate the potential modulating effect on the angiogenesis process and the blood vessels impact, indicated that at concentrations of 100 and 500 µg/mL, MO aqueous extract induced a reduction of thin capillaries. No signs of vascular toxicity were recorded at concentrations as high as 1000 μg/mL. The aqueous extract of MO leaves can be considered a promising candidate for skin disorders with impaired physiological skin parameters.Entities:
Keywords: CAM assay; DPPH; FTIR; LC-MS; Melissa officinalis aqueous extract; SKH-1 hair-less mice; angiogenesis; cell viability; skin parameters
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33921730 PMCID: PMC8073307 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26082369
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Time-dependent antioxidant activity of the aqueous extract of MO leaves.
Peak values and functional groups of the aqueous extract of dried MO leaves.
| Characteristic Absorptions [cm−1] | Functional Group | Bond |
|---|---|---|
| 3431 | Alcohol | O-H stretching vibration (hydroxyl groups H-bonded) |
| 2974 | Acid | O-H stretching vibration |
| 1636 | Alkene | C=C stretching vibration |
| 1400 | Alkane | -C-H bending vibration |
| 1269 | Acid | C-O stretching vibration |
| 1076 | Ester | C-O stretching vibration |
| 617 | Aromatic | =C-H stretching vibration |
Polyphenolic content of an aqueous extract of MO leaves by LC-MS.
| Compound Name | Rt (min) | [M − H+]+ ( | MO Extract (ng/mg d.w.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| gentisic acid | 2.67 | 153 | NQ |
| 10.56 | 163 | NQ | |
| apigenin | 36.91 | 269 | 38.72 |
| chlorogenic acid | 6.45 | 353 | 0.31 |
| caffeic acid | 6.97 | 179 | 0.18 |
| rutin | 23.01 | 609 | 4.06 |
| ferulic acid | 13.91 | 193 | 1.25 |
NQ; Not Quantified.
Figure 2Cell viability assessment of an aqueous extract of MO leaves (20, 100, 250, 500 and 1000 μg/mL) in HaCaT cells at 24 h post-stimulation by means of Alamar blue assay. The results are expressed as a cell viability percentage (%) normalized to cells stimulated with distilled water. The data represent the mean values ± SD of three independent experiments. A one-way ANOVA analysis was applied to determine the statistical differences compared with distilled water-treated cells followed by Tukey’s post-test (**** p < 0.0001).
Figure 3Cell viability assessment of aqueous extracts of MO leaves (20, 100, 250, 500 and 1000 μg/mL) in A375 human melanoma cells at 24 h post stimulation by means of Alamar blue assay. The results are expressed as cell viability percentage (%) normalized to cells stimulated with distilled water. The data represent the mean value ± SD obtained from three independent experiments. One-way ANOVA analysis was applied to determine the statistical differences compared with distilled water-treated cells followed by Tukey’s post-test (**** p < 0.0001).
Figure 4Stereomicroscopic images regarding the effects of the aqueous extracts of MO leaves on the chorioallantoic membrane assay. Evaluation was assessed before application (0 h) and at 24 h after the application of samples (five concentrations of MO aqueous extracts: 10, 50, 100, 500 and 1000 µg/mL) and control (distilled water).
Figure 5Comparative evolution of skin biophysical parameters. (A) Transepidermal water loss (for MO aqueous extract vs. distilled water * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.001). The statistical differences were determined using a two-way ANOVA analysis followed by a Bonferroni post-test; (B) Erythema (for MO aqueous extract vs. distilled water * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.001; *** p < 0.001; for MO aqueous extract vs. Control # p < 0.05; ## p < 0.001; ### p < 0.001). The statistical differences were determined using a two-way ANOVA analysis followed by a Bonferroni post-test; (C) Melanin (for MO aqueous extract vs. distilled water * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.001; *** p < 0.001; for MO aqueous extract vs. Control # p < 0.05; ## p < 0.001; ### p < 0.001). The statistical differences were determined using a two-way ANOVA analysis followed by a Bonferroni post-test; (D) Skin hydration (for MO aqueous extract vs. distilled water * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.001; *** p < 0.001). The statistical differences were determined using a two-way ANOVA analysis followed by a Bonferroni post-test.
Figure 6Schematic protocol of the method used to obtain the aqueous extract of dried Melissa officinalis leaves.