Literature DB >> 22018066

Melanoma in adolescents and young adults (ages 15-39 years): United States, 1999-2006.

Hannah K Weir1, Loraine D Marrett, Vilma Cokkinides, Jill Barnholtz-Sloan, Pragna Patel, Eric Tai, Ahmedin Jemal, Jun Li, Julian Kim, Donatus U Ekwueme.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Invasive melanoma of the skin is the third most common cancer diagnosed among adolescents and young adults (aged 15-39 years) in the United States. Understanding the burden of melanoma in this age group is important to identifying areas for etiologic research and in developing effective prevention approaches aimed at reducing melanoma risk.
METHODS: Melanoma incidence data reported from 38 National Program of Cancer Registries and/or Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results statewide cancer registries covering nearly 67.2% of the US population were used to estimate age-adjusted incidence rates for persons 15-39 years of age. Incidence rate ratios were calculated to compare rates between demographic groups.
RESULTS: Melanoma incidence was higher among females (age-adjusted incidence rates = 9.74; 95% confidence interval 9.62-9.86) compared with males (age-adjusted incidence rates = 5.77; 95% confidence interval 5.68-5.86), increased with age, and was higher in non-Hispanic white compared with Hispanic white and black, American Indians/Alaskan Natives, and Asian and Pacific Islanders populations. Melanoma incidence rates increased with year of diagnosis in females but not males. The majority of melanomas were diagnosed on the trunk in all racial and ethnic groups among males but only in non-Hispanic whites among females. Most melanomas were diagnosed at localized stage, and among those melanomas with known histology, the majority were superficial spreading. LIMITATIONS: Accuracy of melanoma cases reporting was limited because of some incompleteness (delayed reporting) or nonspecific reporting including large proportion of unspecified histology.
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in incidence rates by anatomic site, histology, and stage among adolescents and young adults by race, ethnicity, and sex suggest that both host characteristics and behaviors influence risk. These data suggest areas for etiologic research around gene-environment interactions and the need for targeted cancer control activities specific to adolescents and young adult populations.
Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22018066      PMCID: PMC3254089          DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.04.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol        ISSN: 0190-9622            Impact factor:   11.527


  51 in total

1.  Awareness of the risks of tanning lamps does not influence behavior among college students.

Authors:  J Matthew Knight; Anna N Kirincich; Evan R Farmer; Antoinette F Hood
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2002-10

2.  Use of indoor tanning facilities by white adolescents in the United States.

Authors:  Catherine A Demko; Elaine A Borawski; Sara M Debanne; Kevin D Cooper; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2003-09

3.  Predictors of sunbathing and sunscreen use in college undergraduates.

Authors:  J J Hillhouse; A W Stair; C M Adler
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1996-12

4.  The Danish case-control study of cutaneous malignant melanoma. III. Hormonal and reproductive factors in women.

Authors:  A Osterlind; M A Tucker; B J Stone; O M Jensen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1988-12-15       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Effects of appearance-based admonitions against sun exposure on tanning intentions in young adults.

Authors:  J L Jones; M R Leary
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  Use of indoor tanning sunlamps by US youth, ages 11-18 years, and by their parent or guardian caregivers: prevalence and correlates.

Authors:  Vilma E Cokkinides; Martin A Weinstock; Mary C O'Connell; Michael J Thun
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Survival probabilities and hazard functions of malignant melanoma in Germany 1972-1996, an analysis of 10433 patients. Evolution of gender differences and malignancy.

Authors:  K F Kölmel; B Kulle; A Lippold; C Seebacher
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Building the infrastructure for nationwide cancer surveillance and control--a comparison between the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (United States).

Authors:  Phyllis A Wingo; Patricia M Jamison; Robert A Hiatt; Hannah K Weir; Paul M Gargiullo; Mary Hutton; Nancy C Lee; H Irene Hall
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Exposure to the sun and sunbeds and the risk of cutaneous melanoma in the UK: a case-control study.

Authors:  V Bataille; A Winnett; P Sasieni; J A Newton Bishop; J Cuzick
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Cutaneous melanoma in women: ovulatory life, menopause, and use of exogenous estrogens.

Authors:  E A Holly; R D Cress; D K Ahn
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  44 in total

1.  Association between cutaneous melanoma incidence rates among white US residents and county-level estimates of solar ultraviolet exposure.

Authors:  Thomas B Richards; Christopher J Johnson; Zaria Tatalovich; Myles Cockburn; Melody J Eide; Kevin A Henry; Sue-Min Lai; Sai S Cherala; Youjie Huang; Umed A Ajani
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 11.527

2.  Teen Daughters and Their Mothers in Conversation: Identifying Opportunities for Enhancing Awareness of Risky Tanning Behaviors.

Authors:  Mallorie Gordon; Vivian M Rodríguez; Elyse Shuk; Maria Schoenhammer; Allan C Halpern; Alan C Geller; Jennifer L Hay
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.012

3.  Practices of unregulated tanning facilities in Missouri: implications for statewide legislation.

Authors:  Brundha Balaraman; Lauren K Biesbroeck; Stephanie H Lickerman; Lynn A Cornelius; Donna B Jeffe
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Indoor tanning promotions on social media in six US cities #UVTanning #tanning.

Authors:  Christine A Ricklefs; Nancy L Asdigian; Heidi L Kalra; Joni A Mayer; Robert P Dellavalle; Dawn M Holman; Lori A Crane
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 5.  State of the science on prevention and screening to reduce melanoma incidence and mortality: The time is now.

Authors:  Mary K Tripp; Meg Watson; Sophie J Balk; Susan M Swetter; Jeffrey E Gershenwald
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  The history and use of cancer registry data by public health cancer control programs in the United States.

Authors:  Mary C White; Frances Babcock; Nikki S Hayes; Angela B Mariotto; Faye L Wong; Betsy A Kohler; Hannah K Weir
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Comparison of Florida skin cancer screening rates with those in different US regions.

Authors:  Cristina A Fernandez; Laura A McClure; William G Leblanc; Tainya C Clarke; Robert S Kirsner; Lora E Fleming; Kristopher L Arheart; David J Lee
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.954

8.  The association between demographic and behavioral characteristics and sunburn among U.S. adults - National Health Interview Survey, 2010.

Authors:  Dawn M Holman; Zahava Berkowitz; Gery P Guy; Anne M Hartman; Frank M Perna
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Incidence of childhood and adolescent melanoma in the United States: 1973-2009.

Authors:  Jeannette R Wong; Jenine K Harris; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; Kimberly J Johnson
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 10.  Screening and prevention measures for melanoma: is there a survival advantage?

Authors:  Clara Curiel-Lewandrowski; Suephy C Chen; Susan M Swetter
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.