| Literature DB >> 33921719 |
Zinnia Shah1, Umar Farooq Gohar1, Iffat Jamshed1, Aamir Mushtaq2, Hamid Mukhtar1, Muhammad Zia-Ui-Haq3, Sebastian Ionut Toma4, Rosana Manea4, Marius Moga4, Bianca Popovici4.
Abstract
Podophyllotoxin, along with its various derivatives and congeners are widely recognized as broad-spectrum pharmacologically active compounds. Etoposide, for instance, is the frontline chemotherapeutic drug used against various cancers due to its superior anticancer activity. It has recently been redeveloped for the purpose of treating cytokine storm in COVID-19 patients. Podophyllotoxin and its naturally occurring congeners have low bioavailability and almost all these initially discovered compounds cause systemic toxicity and development of drug resistance. Moreover, the production of synthetic derivatives that could suffice for the clinical limitations of these naturally occurring compounds is not economically feasible. These challenges demanded continuous devotions towards improving the druggability of these drugs and continue to seek structure-optimization strategies. The discovery of renewable sources including microbial origin for podophyllotoxin is another possible approach. This review focuses on the exigency of innovation and research required in the global R&D and pharmaceutical industry for podophyllotoxin and related compounds based on recent scientific findings and market predictions.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; antitumor phytochemical; chemotherapy; cytokine storm; novel biomolecules; podophyllotoxins
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33921719 PMCID: PMC8073934 DOI: 10.3390/biom11040603
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Figure 1The sequential discovery of podophyllotoxin-group of drugs. FDA approved anticancer drugs etoposide, teniposide and etopophos were derived from the parent compound podophyllotoxin, which was originally extracted from mayapple plant as a curative for various diseases. As the side-effects for podophyllotoxin and its primary derivatives became evident, less toxic derivatives such as TOP-53, NK611, GL-331, azatoxin and various others were designed and synthesized.
Figure 2Structural representation of podophyllotoxin. The structure is constituted of 4 aromatic rings A, B, C and D arranged in an almost planar system whereas ring E is attached quasi-axially at C4 of ring C.
Figure 3Podophyllotoxin derivatives produced by selective cleavage of ring A through Schreier’s method and the modified-Schreier method. These ring-A-open compounds, however, appeared biologically less active than podophyllotoxin itself.
Figure 4The significance of ring A for biological functionality of podophyllotoxin and its derivatives introduced three crucially significant domains in the parent pharmacophore model. Modifying these domains provided a number of new derivatives as shown (Compound XX1–XXVI). These compounds show distinct mechanism of actions in comparison to the previously discovered podophyllotoxin derivatives.
Figure 5Structures of alpha-peltatin and beta-peltatin. These two B-ring modified podophyllotoxin derivatives are known to exhibit significant antiviral and antitumor activities. The B-ring modified pharmacophore was identified from these compounds and was taken further to synthesize more derivatives—as shown bracketed—none of which elicited any clinical efficacy.
Figure 6A series of delactonized D-ring derivatives have remained the focus of many studies. An ethyl hydrazide derivative, drawn here, was reportedly the only D-ring modified compound, which showed clinical efficacy, but was discontinued after occurrence of various cases of severe side-effects related to its use.
Figure 7The figure shows structural illustrations of E-ring modified derivatives much of which have proved to be clinically significant.
Various plants from different plant families, which are well reported as sources of podophyllotoxin.
| S. No. | Family; | Part Used | Derivative | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| Extract of subaerial part | Deoxy podorhizone and deoxypodophyllotoxin | [ |
| 2 |
| Extract of aerial part | Podophyllotoxin lignan | [ |
| 3 | Extract of root, Culture of Callus, | Podophyllotoxin, kaempferol and quercetin, Podophyllotoxin derivatives, 4-demethylisopodophyllotoxin | [ | |
| 4 |
| Resin, Stem bark, Exudate, Stem, Extract of root | Derivatives of podophyllotoxin, Deoxypodophyllotoxin, 4-demethyldeoxypodophyllotoxin | [ |
| 5 |
| Extract of needle leaf | Podophyllotoxin and derivatives | [ |
| 6 |
| Extract of needle leaf, Culture of suspension, culture of callus, needle leaf aqueous suspension, extract of needle leaf, Extract of stem, Extract of wood, Aerial part, Twig and extract of needle leaf | Podophyllotoxin and derivatives, Deoxypodophyllotoxin, 5-methoxypodophyllotoxin | [ |
| 7 | Culture of hairy root, Culture of suspension, Seed extract, root extract, aerial part, Callus, Tissue culture, Aerial Tissue culture, cell culture | Podophyllotoxin, Podophyllotoxin derivatives, 5-methoxypodophyllotoxin, 6-methylpodophyllotoxin, 6-methoxypodophyllotoxin | [ |
Figure 8The production of podophyllotoxin in plants takes place in 33 steps where coniferyl alcohol acts as the precursor. The pathway is called phenylpropanoid pathway. In the early steps of podophyllotoxin biosynthesis coniferyl alcohol in formed in nine steps from phenylalanine. Coniferyl alcohol then undergoes a site-selective and unusual enantio-dimerization to form (+)-pinoresinol. Pinoresinol is then reduced to (−)-secoisolariciresinol, which is catalyzed by a dehydrogenase to (−)-matairesinol. The next intermediate formed is (−)-pluviatolide, which is methylated to (−)-5′-desmethoxy-yatein that is converted to the yatein. Yatein is the intermediate that gets converted to the end product; podophyllotoxin [109].
Various fungal sources reported as sources of podophyllotoxin.
| Class | Fungal Endophyte | Host Plant | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sordariomycetes |
| [ | |
| Agaricomycetes |
|
| [ |
| Leotiomycetes |
|
| [ |
| Dothideomycetes |
|
| [ |
| Eurotiomycetes |
|
| [ |
| Ascomycetes |
| [ | |
| Zygomycetes |
|
| [ |
The influence of varying parameters on yield of plant-biosynthesized podophyllotoxin.
| Parameters | General Effect | Sub-Parameter | Podophyllotoxin Yield | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Light | Light can increase or decrease the biosynthesis of podophyllotoxin. | Red light | Substantial increase | [ |
| Blue light | Slight increase | |||
| White light | Decrease | |||
| Chilling Temperature | Chilling temperature can increase or decrease the biosynthesis of podophyllotoxin | 4 °C | 5-folds increase | [ |
| 10 °C | 3.33-folds increase | |||
| Macro Nutrients | At different concentrations major nutrients can increase or decrease the biosynthesis of podophyllotoxin | Glucose concentration | Highest levels of yield at 60 g/L | [ |
| Phosphate concentration | Highest levels of yield at 1.25 mM | |||
| Nitrogen concentration | Highest levels of yield at 60 mM | |||
| Micro Nutrients | Different ions can influence the yield of podophyllotoxin | NO3−, PO43−, Na+, Fe2+, Mn2+ | Positive correlation | [ |
| SO42−, K+ | Negative correlation | |||
| Mg2+, Ca2+, Cu, Zn | No correlation | |||
| Soil Nutrients | Podophyllotoxin production can be increased or decreased by acidic or basic pH and nutrient availability | pH | Podophyllotoxin content was increased significantly (more than 6.62%) when pH of soil was 4.82 | [ |
| Nitrogen | Podophyllotoxin content was increased significantly when nitrogen content was 2.7% | |||
| Carbon | Podophyllotoxin content was increased significantly when soil organic carbon content was 3.32% |
Pharmacological activities of podophyllotoxin and its derivatives.
| Activity | Podophyllotoxin Derivative | Mechanism | Conclusion | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cytotoxic activity | Cleistantoxin | Activity was checked against MCF-7, MCF-7R, KBand HT29 cancer cell lines | Cleistantoxin showed strong cytotoxic activity | [ |
| Antibacterial activity | New precursors of podophyllotoxin were synthesized, and screened to check their antibacterial activity | Activity was checked against | Ethyl-2-(3′-methyl-4′-methoxybenzoyl)-3-(4″ methoxyphenol)-cyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid and Ethyl-2-(3′-methyl-4′-methoxybenzyol-3-1 3″, 4″-dimethoxyphenyl)-cyclopropane-carboxylic acid, both of them showed significant antibacterial activity | [ |
| Antitumour activity | VP 16-213 (NSC-141540) | Activity was checked against L1210 ascites tumour in N/D mice | In 24 hours, divided treatment after every 3 hours, resulted in significant cure, hence, VP 16-213 is a cell cycle specific drug | [ |
| Insecticidal activity | 20 podophyllotoxin analogues were tested | Activity was checked against fifth-instar larvae of | Among 20 analogues Deoxypodophyllotoxin showed more protential for insecticidal activity than a commercial insecticide (toosendanin) | [ |
| Antineoplastic activity | New hybrids of podophyllotoxin and indirubin | Activity was checked against human leukemia cancer cells as a multifunctional anti-MDR agent | Podophyllotoxin-indirubin hybrid (Da-1) showed potential to overcome drug resistance. It is a novel hybrid havingpotent antiproliferative activity | [ |
| Cyclolignans, derived from podophyllotoxin | Activity was checked againstA-549 human lung carcinoma, P-388 murine leukemia and HT-29 colon carcinoma | A number of substances were active in assay at concentrations below 1 pM; deoxypodophyllotoxin being the most potent compound in all cases | [ |
Novel patented podophyllotoxin derivatives.
| Sr. No | Formulae | Patent Number | Medical Application | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| US-8158809-B2 | Cancer treatment | [ |
| 2 | -NA- | WO-02/102804-A1 | Inhibit Insulin-like growth factor-1′s tyrosine-phosphorylation activity | [ |
| 3 | WO-03082875-A3 | Cancer treatment | [ | |
| 4 | US-10639295-B2 | Elevated pharmaceutical efficacy in terms of drug concentration buildup in body | [ | |
| 5 | Assignee: Council Of Scientific and Industrial Research—status: pending | US-2020123171-A1 | NA | [ |
| 6 |
| US-8236935-B2 | Cancer treatment | [ |
| 7 | US-2020216462-A1 | Improved antitumor activity, reduced undesired cytotoxicity | [ | |
| 8 | US-9828386-B2 | Elevated antitumor activity than podophyllotoxin or 4′demethylepipodophyllotoxin | [ |
Figure 9Year wise patent publications filed on podophyllotoxin.
Figure 10Key patent filing companies on podophyllotoxin.
Figure 11Key inventors in the podophyllotoxin field.
Figure 12Top US owners of patents related to podophyllotoxin.