| Literature DB >> 33920952 |
Reem I Al-Wabli1, Mona A Alsulami1, Sarah I Bukhari2, Nadine M S Moubayed3, Maha S Al-Mutairi1, Mohamed I Attia1,4.
Abstract
The increasing prevalence of microbial infections and the emergence of resistance to the currently available antimicrobial drugs urged the development of potent new chemical entities with eminent pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic profiles. Thus, a series of new indole-triazole conjugates 6a-u was designed and synthesized to be assessed as new antimicrobial candidates using the diameter of the inhibition zone and minimum inhibitory concentration assays against certain microbial strains. Their in vitro antibacterial evaluation revealed good to moderate activity against most of the tested Gram-negative strains with diameter of the inhibition zone (DIZ) values in the range of 11-15 mm and minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) values around 250 µg/mL. Meanwhile, their in vitro antifungal evaluation demonstrated a potent activity against Candida tropicalis with MIC value as low as 2 µg/mL for most of the tested compounds. Moreover, compound 6f is the most potent congener with an MIC value of 2 µg/mL against Candida albicans.Entities:
Keywords: 1,2,4-triazole-3-thiol; antibacterial; antifungal; indole
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33920952 PMCID: PMC8071222 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26082292
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Synthesis of the target compounds 6a-u.
Antibacterial activity of the target compounds 6a-u against E. coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella typhimurium, Staphylococcus aureus, and Bacillus subtilis.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| DIZ ± SD * | MIC (µg/mL) | DIZ ± SD * | MIC (µg/mL) | DIZ ± SD * | MIC (µg/mL) | DIZ ± SD * | MIC (µg/mL) | DIZ ± SD * | MIC (µg/mL) |
|
| 11 ± 1.06 | 1000 | 0 | - | 10 ± 0.00 | 1000 | 0 | - | 10 ± 0.70 | 1000 |
|
| 11 ± 0.70 | 250 | 13 ± 7.50 | 250 | 10 ± 0.70 | 250 | 0 | - | 10 ± 2.12 | 250 |
|
| 11 ± 2.12 | 250 | 14 ± 8.08 | 250 | 11 ± 2.88 | 250 | 0 | - | 9 ± 0.00 | 250 |
|
| 10 ± 1.41 | 250 | 15 ± 8.66 | 250 | 11 ± 3.46 | 250 | 0 | - | 9 ± 0.00 | 250 |
|
| 12 ± 1.41 | 250 | 0 | - | 11 ± 1.73 | 250 | 0 | - | 9 ± 0.00 | 500 |
|
| 11 ± 0.70 | 500 | 0 | - | 10 ± 0.00 | 500 | 0 | - | 10 ± 0.70 | 250 |
|
| 11 ± 0.70 | 250 | 10 ±5.50 | 250 | 10 ± 1.15 | 250 | 0 | - | 10 ± 0.70 | 250 |
|
| 12 ± 1.41 | 250 | 10 ± 1.00 | 250 | 10 ± 0.57 | 500 | 9 ± 0.57 | 1000 | 0 | - |
|
| 12 ± 2.12 | 250 | 11 ± 1.52 | 250 | 10 ± 0.70 | 250 | 9 ± 1.52 | 250 | 0 | - |
|
| 14 ± 3.53 | 1000 | 12 ± 1.32 | 500 | 11 ± 0.35 | 500 | 11 ± 1.41 | 500 | 0 | - |
|
| 14 ± 3.53 | 250 | 11 ± 0.57 | 250 | 10 ± 0.57 | 250 | 10 ± 1.41 | 250 | 0 | - |
|
| 14 ± 3.53 | 250 | 10 ± 1.15 | 250 | 9 ± 0.00 | 250 | 11 ± 1.00 | 500 | 0 | - |
|
| 12 ± 2.82 | 250 | 10 ± 0.57 | 250 | 10 ± 1.73 | 250 | 10 ± 0.57 | 250 | 0 | - |
|
| 13 ± 2.12 | 500 | 12 ± 1.15 | 250 | 11 ± 1.00 | 250 | 11 ± 1.00 | 250 | 0 | - |
|
| 11 ± 0.70 | 1000 | 13 ± 2.51 | 1000 | 11 ± 1.00 | 1000 | 0 | - | 0 | - |
|
| 11 ± 0.00 | 500 | 12 ± 2.00 | 500 | 11 ± 2.00 | 500 | 0 | - | 0 | - |
|
| 12 ± 1.06 | 500 | 12 ± 1.52 | 250 | 11 ± 1.15 | 250 | 0 | - | 0 | - |
|
| 12 ± 0.70 | 250 | 13 ± 2.64 | 500 | 12 ± 1.52 | 250 | 0 | - | 0 | - |
|
| 10 ± 1.41 | 250 | 14 ± 3.60 | 250 | 11 ± 1.52 | 500 | 0 | - | 0 | - |
|
| 11 ± 0.00 | 500 | 13 ± 3.01 | 500 | 11 ± 1.73 | 500 | 0 | - | 0 | - |
|
| 11 ± 1.41 | 1000 | 13 ± 2.00 | 1000 | 12 ± 1.15 | 1000 | 0 | - | 12 ± 1.00 | 250 |
|
| 08 ± 0.57 | 500 | 24 ± 0.40 | 1000 | 14 ± 0.60 | 500 | 0 | 500 | 08 ± 0.28 | 500 |
* The arithmetic mean of the inhibition zone diameters in mean ± standard deviation. (-) not determined.
Antifungal activity of the target compounds 6a-u against Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, and Candida glabrata.
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| DIZ ± SD * | MIC (µg/mL) | DIZ ± SD * | MIC (µg/mL) | DIZ ± SD * | MIC (µg/mL) |
|
| 26 ± 0.28 | 1000 | 13 ± 0.57 | 2 | 10 ± 0.57 | 1000 |
|
| 26 ± 0.11 | 250 | 14 ± 1.52 | 2 | 10 ± 0.00 | 250 |
|
| 26 ± 0.28 | 250 | 14 ± 2.08 | 2 | 10 ± 0.57 | 250 |
|
| 27 ± 0.00 | 250 | 14 ± 3.46 | 4 | 10 ± 1.00 | 125 |
|
| 26 ± 0.28 | 250 | 14 ± 3.21 | 4 | 11 ± 1.15 | 250 |
|
| 26 ± 0.28 | 2 | 14 ± 2.00 | 4 | 10 ± 0.00 | 250 |
|
| 26 ± 0.11 | 250 | 14 ± 1.15 | 4 | 10 ± 0.57 | 1000 |
|
| 0 | - | 12 ± 0.57 | 2 | 0 | |
|
| 0 | - | 11 ± 0.57 | 4 | 0 | - |
|
| 0 | - | 11 ± 0.57 | 4 | 0 | - |
|
| 0 | - | 10 ± 0.00 | 2 | 0 | - |
|
| 0 | - | 10 ± 0.00 | 2 | 0 | - |
|
| 0 | - | 10 ± 0.57 | 2 | 0 | - |
|
| 0 | - | 11 ± 0.57 | 2 | 0 | - |
|
| 11 ± 0.70 | 1000 | 11 ± 0.57 | 16 | 0 | - |
|
| 10 ± 0.00 | 32 | 11 ± 0.57 | 4 | 0 | - |
|
| 10 ± 0.70 | 32 | 11 ± 0.57 | 12.5 | 0 | - |
|
| 10 ± 0.70 | 32 | 14 ± 0.57 | 2 | 0 | - |
|
| 10 ± 0.00 | 250 | 12 ± 1.52 | 2 | 10 ± 0.57 | 62.5 |
|
| 11 ± 0.70 | 250 | 11 ± 0.57 | 2 | 10 ± 0.57 | 32 |
|
| 10 ± 0.00 | 1000 | 17 ± 0.28 | 2 | 13 ± 1.00 | 16 |
|
| 07 ± 0.28 | 250 | 15 ± 0.11 | 1000 | 15 ± 0.57 | 1000 |
* The arithmetic mean of the inhibition zone diameters in mean ± standard deviation. (-) not determined.