| Literature DB >> 33920071 |
Mohamed Tharwat Elabbasy1,2, Mohamed A Hussein2, Fahad Dhafer Algahtani1, Ghada I Abd El-Rahman3, Alaa Eldin Morshdy2, Ibrahim A Elkafrawy4, Adeniyi A Adeboye1,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The emergenEntities:
Keywords: MALDI-TOF MS and beef; Non-O157; multiple antibiotic resistance E. coli; slaughterhouse
Year: 2021 PMID: 33920071 PMCID: PMC8069270 DOI: 10.3390/foods10040820
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Prevalence of E. coli in different kinds of samples taken from beef carcasses and slaughterhouse environments (n = 20).
| Samples | Prevalence |
|---|---|
| Abattoir effluent | 20 (100%) |
| Abattoir floor | 20 (100%) |
| Abattoir wall | 11 (55%) |
| Beef brisket | 15 (75%) |
| Beef shoulder | 16 (80%) |
| Beef thigh | 13 (65%) |
| Knives | 9 (45%) |
| Water | Not detected |
| Worker hands | 6 (30%) |
Figure 1Characteristic spectra of MALDI-TOF MS. The variations in the mass spectrum of E. coli isolates are displayed by color.
Figure 2Three-dimensional principal component analysis of MALDI-TOF MS mass spectra of the tested E. coli isolates. The greatest potential for distinction was shown by PC1 and PC2 and a cluster of isolates was shown, whereas the non-related isolates are less similar.
Figure 3PCA-based dendrogram mass spectra of the tested E. coli isolates generated by MALDI-TOF MS. Non-related isolates are illustrated by red.
Figure 4Virtual gel analysis using the MALDI BioTyper 3′s special tool reveals changes in band pattern. The m/z values are represented on the x axis, and the obtained mass spectra of the tested E. coli isolates are represented on the y axis. The protein expression profile peaks produced by MS are seen for isolates. Non-related isolates are illustrated by red labels.
Serotyping of E. coli strains isolated from beef carcasses and slaughterhouse environments samples.
| O166 | O146 | O44 | O111 | O26 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abattoir effluent | 3 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 3 |
| Abattoir floor | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 2 |
| Abattoir wall | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Beef brisket | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Beef shoulder | 2 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 2 |
| Beef thigh | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 |
| Knives | 3 | - | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| Worker hands | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | - |
| Total | 21 (19.10%) | 18 (16.36%) | 20 (18.18%) | 35 (31.81%) | 16 (14.54%) |
| Types | ETEC | EPEC | EPEC | EHEC | EHEC |
EHEC: Enterohemorrhagic E. coli. EPEC: Enteropathogenic E. coli. ETEC: Enterotoxigenic E. coli. E. coli: Escherichia coli.
Antimicrobial resistance pattern of the isolated E. coli strains from carcass shoulder, carcass brisket, carcass thigh, and abattoir effluent (n = 20).
| Antimicrobial Agent | Sensitive | Intermediate | Resistant | Serotype |
| Pathotype |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Penicillin (P) | - | - | 20 (100%) | O166 | 5 | ETEC |
| Erythromycin (E) | - | 2 (20%) | 18 (80%) | |||
| Oxytetracycline (T) | 3 (15%) | 2 (10%) | 15 (75%) | |||
| Nalidixic acid (NA) | 4 (20%) | 3 (15%) | 13 (65%) | |||
| Ampicillin (AM) | - | 8 (40%) | 12 (60%) | |||
| Sulfamethoxazol (SXT) | 6 (30%) | 3 (15%) | 11 (55%) | |||
| Cephalotin (CN) | 9 (45%) | 2 (10%) | 9 (45%) | |||
| Enrofloxacin (EN) | 10 (50%) | 2 (10%) | 8 (40%) | |||
| Oxacillin (OX) | 12 (60%) | 1 (5%) | 7 (35%) | |||
| Neomycin (N) | 14 (70%) | - | 6 (30%) | |||
| Chloramphenicol (C) | 16 (80%) | - | 4 (20%) | |||
| Kanamycin (K) | 15(75%) | 2 (10%) | 3 (15%) | |||
| Ciprofloxacin (CP) | 16 (80%) | 2 (10%) | 2 (10%) | |||
| Gentamicin (G) | 19 (95%) | - | 1 (5%) | |||
ETEC, enterotoxigenic E. coli; EPEC, enteropathogenic E. coli; EHEC, enterohemorrhagic E. coli.
Multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) index and antimicrobial resistance profile of the isolated E. coli strains from carcass shoulder, carcass brisket, carcass thigh, and abattoir effluent (n = 20).
| Resistance Pattern | Resistance Profile | Number of Isolates | Number of Antibiotics | MAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| i. | P, E, T, NA, AM, SXT, CN, EN, OX, N, C, K, CP, G | 1 | 14 | 1 |
| ii. | P, E, T, NA, AM, SXT, CN, EN, OX, N, C, K, CP | 1 | 13 | 0.92 |
| iii. | P, E, T, NA, AM, SXT, CN, EN, OX, N, C, K | 1 | 12 | 0.85 |
| iv. | P, E, T, NA, AM, SXT, CN, EN, OX, N, C | 1 | 11 | 0.78 |
| v. | P, E, T, NA, AM, SXT, CN, EN, OX, N | 2 | 10 | 0.714 |
| vi. | P, E, T, NA, AM, SXT, CN, EN, OX | 1 | 9 | 0.642 |
| vii. | P, E, T, NA, AM, SXT, CN, EN | 1 | 8 | 0.571 |
| viii. | P, E, T, NA, AM, SXT, CN | 1 | 7 | 0.5 |
| ix. | P, E, T, NA, AM, SXT | 2 | 6 | 0.428 |
| x. | P, E, T, NA, AM | 1 | 5 | 0.357 |
| xi. | P, E, T, NA | 1 | 4 | 0.285 |
| xii. | P, E, T | 2 | 3 | 0.21 |
| xiii. | P, E | 3 | 2 | 0.142 |
| xiv. | P | 2 | 1 | 0.071 |
| Average | 0.533 | |||
Figure 5Agarose gel electrophoresis of phoA gene (720 bp). L: 100 bp ladder as molecular size DNA marker. Pos: Control positive for phoA gene. Neg: Control negative. Lanes from 1 to 10: Positive E. coli strains (O166, O146, O44, O111, and O26) isolated from beef shoulder and abattoir effluent for phoA gene.
Figure 6Agarose gel electrophoresis of bla gene (516 bp). L: 100 bp ladder as molecular size DNA marker. Pos: Control positive for bla gene. Neg: Control negative. Lanes from 1 to 10: Positive E. coli strains (O166, O146, O44, O111, and O26) isolated from beef shoulder and abattoir effluent for bla gene.