| Literature DB >> 33920071 |
Mohamed Tharwat Elabbasy1,2, Mohamed A Hussein2, Fahad Dhafer Algahtani1, Ghada I Abd El-Rahman3, Alaa Eldin Morshdy2, Ibrahim A Elkafrawy4, Adeniyi A Adeboye1,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The emergence of multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) Escherichia coli (E. coli) and virulent non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) poses a growing concern to the meat industry. Non-O157 STEC strains including O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145 have been implicated in the occurrence of bloody diarrhea and hemolytic uremic syndrome in humans. This research assessed prevalence, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass-spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) protein mass-spectra profiles, multidrug-resistance traits, polymerase chain reaction detection of virulence, and antibiotic-resistance genes of E. coli isolated from beef carcasses and slaughterhouse environments.Entities:
Keywords: MALDI-TOF MS and beef; Non-O157; multiple antibiotic resistance E. coli; slaughterhouse
Year: 2021 PMID: 33920071 PMCID: PMC8069270 DOI: 10.3390/foods10040820
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Prevalence of E. coli in different kinds of samples taken from beef carcasses and slaughterhouse environments (n = 20).
| Samples | Prevalence |
|---|---|
| Abattoir effluent | 20 (100%) |
| Abattoir floor | 20 (100%) |
| Abattoir wall | 11 (55%) |
| Beef brisket | 15 (75%) |
| Beef shoulder | 16 (80%) |
| Beef thigh | 13 (65%) |
| Knives | 9 (45%) |
| Water | Not detected |
| Worker hands | 6 (30%) |
Figure 1Characteristic spectra of MALDI-TOF MS. The variations in the mass spectrum of E. coli isolates are displayed by color.
Figure 2Three-dimensional principal component analysis of MALDI-TOF MS mass spectra of the tested E. coli isolates. The greatest potential for distinction was shown by PC1 and PC2 and a cluster of isolates was shown, whereas the non-related isolates are less similar.
Figure 3PCA-based dendrogram mass spectra of the tested E. coli isolates generated by MALDI-TOF MS. Non-related isolates are illustrated by red.
Figure 4Virtual gel analysis using the MALDI BioTyper 3′s special tool reveals changes in band pattern. The m/z values are represented on the x axis, and the obtained mass spectra of the tested E. coli isolates are represented on the y axis. The protein expression profile peaks produced by MS are seen for isolates. Non-related isolates are illustrated by red labels.
Serotyping of E. coli strains isolated from beef carcasses and slaughterhouse environments samples.
| O166 | O146 | O44 | O111 | O26 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abattoir effluent | 3 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 3 |
| Abattoir floor | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 2 |
| Abattoir wall | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Beef brisket | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Beef shoulder | 2 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 2 |
| Beef thigh | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 |
| Knives | 3 | - | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| Worker hands | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | - |
| Total | 21 (19.10%) | 18 (16.36%) | 20 (18.18%) | 35 (31.81%) | 16 (14.54%) |
| Types | ETEC | EPEC | EPEC | EHEC | EHEC |
EHEC: Enterohemorrhagic E. coli. EPEC: Enteropathogenic E. coli. ETEC: Enterotoxigenic E. coli. E. coli: Escherichia coli.
Antimicrobial resistance pattern of the isolated E. coli strains from carcass shoulder, carcass brisket, carcass thigh, and abattoir effluent (n = 20).
| Antimicrobial Agent | Sensitive | Intermediate | Resistant | Serotype |
| Pathotype |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Penicillin (P) | - | - | 20 (100%) | O166 | 5 | ETEC |
| Erythromycin (E) | - | 2 (20%) | 18 (80%) | |||
| Oxytetracycline (T) | 3 (15%) | 2 (10%) | 15 (75%) | |||
| Nalidixic acid (NA) | 4 (20%) | 3 (15%) | 13 (65%) | |||
| Ampicillin (AM) | - | 8 (40%) | 12 (60%) | |||
| Sulfamethoxazol (SXT) | 6 (30%) | 3 (15%) | 11 (55%) | |||
| Cephalotin (CN) | 9 (45%) | 2 (10%) | 9 (45%) | |||
| Enrofloxacin (EN) | 10 (50%) | 2 (10%) | 8 (40%) | |||
| Oxacillin (OX) | 12 (60%) | 1 (5%) | 7 (35%) | |||
| Neomycin (N) | 14 (70%) | - | 6 (30%) | |||
| Chloramphenicol (C) | 16 (80%) | - | 4 (20%) | |||
| Kanamycin (K) | 15(75%) | 2 (10%) | 3 (15%) | |||
| Ciprofloxacin (CP) | 16 (80%) | 2 (10%) | 2 (10%) | |||
| Gentamicin (G) | 19 (95%) | - | 1 (5%) | |||
ETEC, enterotoxigenic E. coli; EPEC, enteropathogenic E. coli; EHEC, enterohemorrhagic E. coli.
Multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) index and antimicrobial resistance profile of the isolated E. coli strains from carcass shoulder, carcass brisket, carcass thigh, and abattoir effluent (n = 20).
| Resistance Pattern | Resistance Profile | Number of Isolates | Number of Antibiotics | MAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| i. | P, E, T, NA, AM, SXT, CN, EN, OX, N, C, K, CP, G | 1 | 14 | 1 |
| ii. | P, E, T, NA, AM, SXT, CN, EN, OX, N, C, K, CP | 1 | 13 | 0.92 |
| iii. | P, E, T, NA, AM, SXT, CN, EN, OX, N, C, K | 1 | 12 | 0.85 |
| iv. | P, E, T, NA, AM, SXT, CN, EN, OX, N, C | 1 | 11 | 0.78 |
| v. | P, E, T, NA, AM, SXT, CN, EN, OX, N | 2 | 10 | 0.714 |
| vi. | P, E, T, NA, AM, SXT, CN, EN, OX | 1 | 9 | 0.642 |
| vii. | P, E, T, NA, AM, SXT, CN, EN | 1 | 8 | 0.571 |
| viii. | P, E, T, NA, AM, SXT, CN | 1 | 7 | 0.5 |
| ix. | P, E, T, NA, AM, SXT | 2 | 6 | 0.428 |
| x. | P, E, T, NA, AM | 1 | 5 | 0.357 |
| xi. | P, E, T, NA | 1 | 4 | 0.285 |
| xii. | P, E, T | 2 | 3 | 0.21 |
| xiii. | P, E | 3 | 2 | 0.142 |
| xiv. | P | 2 | 1 | 0.071 |
| Average | 0.533 | |||
Figure 5Agarose gel electrophoresis of phoA gene (720 bp). L: 100 bp ladder as molecular size DNA marker. Pos: Control positive for phoA gene. Neg: Control negative. Lanes from 1 to 10: Positive E. coli strains (O166, O146, O44, O111, and O26) isolated from beef shoulder and abattoir effluent for phoA gene.
Figure 6Agarose gel electrophoresis of bla gene (516 bp). L: 100 bp ladder as molecular size DNA marker. Pos: Control positive for bla gene. Neg: Control negative. Lanes from 1 to 10: Positive E. coli strains (O166, O146, O44, O111, and O26) isolated from beef shoulder and abattoir effluent for bla gene.