Literature DB >> 20378282

Effect of the enrichment time and immunomagnetic separation on the detection of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O26, O103, O111, O145 and sorbitol positive O157 from artificially inoculated cattle faeces.

Karen Verstraete1, Lieven De Zutter, Winy Messens, Lieve Herman, Marc Heyndrickx, Koen De Reu.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of enrichment time and immunomagnetic separation (IMS) on the efficiency of a method to isolate non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) serotypes O26, O103, O111, O145 and sorbitol positive (s+) O157 from artificially inoculated cattle faeces. Cattle faecal samples were inoculated with varying amounts (20-90 cfu/25 g and 200-900 cfu/25 g) of clinical STEC strains (including serotypes O26, O103, O111, O145 and O157 (s- and s+)), and recovered using a selective enrichment step of either 6 or 24h, followed by plating on selective agars either preceded by IMS or not. Two types of IMS beads were used (Dynabeads) and Captivate beads), and evaluated on pure broth suspensions of STEC. The 6-h enrichment instead of 24-h, had no significant effect on the recovery rate, only for serotype O145 a positive trend was observed. Using direct plating after enrichment, recovery rates were influenced by the inoculated serotype and the inoculation level. Using IMS (Dynabeads) or Captivate beads), recovery of serotype O157 (s- and s+) was significantly improved, whereas for O26, O103, O111, and O145 no significant effect was observed. Results of IMS performed on pure suspensions of STEC, explained these serotype-depended findings in faeces; loss-making factors in the IMS procedure of some beads and the influence of the type of bead were shown. The method combining both enrichment periods with direct plating and IMS followed by plating, yielded a detection limit of 20-90 cfu/25 g. But, if only certain serotypes have to be investigated, the protocol can be simplified. (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20378282     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  8 in total

1.  Prevalence of carriage of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli serotypes O157:H7, O26:H11, O103:H2, O111:H8, and O145:H28 among slaughtered adult cattle in France.

Authors:  Delphine Bibbal; Estelle Loukiadis; Monique Kérourédan; Franck Ferré; Françoise Dilasser; Carine Peytavin de Garam; Philippe Cartier; Eric Oswald; Emilie Gay; Frédéric Auvray; Hubert Brugère
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Comparison of Enrichment Broths for Supporting Growth of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Zachary R Stromberg; Gentry L Lewis; David B Marx; Rodney A Moxley
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Intimin gene (eae) subtype-based real-time PCR strategy for specific detection of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli serotypes O157:H7, O26:H11, O103:H2, O111:H8, and O145:H28 in cattle feces.

Authors:  Delphine Bibbal; Estelle Loukiadis; Monique Kérourédan; Carine Peytavin de Garam; Franck Ferré; Philippe Cartier; Emilie Gay; Eric Oswald; Frédéric Auvray; Hubert Brugère
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  A Comparison of Culture- and PCR-Based Methods to Detect Six Major Non-O157 Serogroups of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli in Cattle Feces.

Authors:  Lance W Noll; Pragathi B Shridhar; Diana M Dewsbury; Xiaorong Shi; Natalia Cernicchiaro; David G Renter; T G Nagaraja
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A qPCR assay to detect and quantify Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) in cattle and on farms: a potential predictive tool for STEC culture-positive farms.

Authors:  Karen Verstraete; Els Van Coillie; Hadewig Werbrouck; Stephanie Van Weyenberg; Lieve Herman; Jurgen Del-Favero; Peter De Rijk; Lieven De Zutter; Maria-Adelheid Joris; Marc Heyndrickx; Koen De Reu
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 4.546

6.  MALDI-TOF MS Based Typing for Rapid Screening of Multiple Antibiotic Resistance E. coli and Virulent Non-O157 Shiga Toxin-Producing E. coli Isolated from the Slaughterhouse Settings and Beef Carcasses.

Authors:  Mohamed Tharwat Elabbasy; Mohamed A Hussein; Fahad Dhafer Algahtani; Ghada I Abd El-Rahman; Alaa Eldin Morshdy; Ibrahim A Elkafrawy; Adeniyi A Adeboye
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-04-10

7.  Genotypic analyses of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 and non-O157 recovered from feces of domestic animals on rural farms in Mexico.

Authors:  Bianca A Amézquita-López; Beatriz Quiñones; Michael B Cooley; Josefina León-Félix; Nohelia Castro-del Campo; Robert E Mandrell; Maribel Jiménez; Cristóbal Chaidez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Development of a robust method for isolation of shiga toxin-positive Escherichia coli (STEC) from fecal, plant, soil and water samples from a leafy greens production region in California.

Authors:  Michael B Cooley; Michele Jay-Russell; Edward R Atwill; Diana Carychao; Kimberly Nguyen; Beatriz Quiñones; Ronak Patel; Samarpita Walker; Michelle Swimley; Edith Pierre-Jerome; Andrew G Gordus; Robert E Mandrell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.