| Literature DB >> 33919641 |
Tannaz Jamialahmadi1, Mohsen Nematy1, Simona Bo2, Valentina Ponzo2, Ali Jangjoo3, Ladan Goshayeshi4,5, Aida Tasbandi6, Nikita G Nikiforov7,8, Amirhossein Sahebkar6,9,10,11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Obesity is a chronic inflammatory condition associated with increased circulating levels of C-reactive protein (CRP). Bariatric surgery has been reported to be effective in improving both inflammatory and liver status. Our aims were to elucidate the relationships between pre-surgery high sensitivity-CRP (hs-CRP) values and post-surgery weight loss and liver steatosis and fibrosis in patients with severe obesity undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.Entities:
Keywords: bariatric surgery; fatty liver disease; inflammation; steatohepatitis
Year: 2021 PMID: 33919641 PMCID: PMC8073671 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11040721
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) ISSN: 2075-4418
Patient Characteristics.
| Variable | Total |
|---|---|
| Male (%) | 18 (20) |
| Age (years) | 38.5 ± 11.1 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 45.46 ± 6.26 |
| Weight (kg) | 121.34 ± 20.32 |
| Waist Circumference (cm) | 133.04 ± 13.6 |
| Height (m) | 1.62 ± 8.87 |
| Type 2 diabetes mellitus (%) | 25 (27.8) |
| Arterial hypertension (%) | 23 (25.6) |
| Metabolic syndrome (%) | 46 (51.1) |
BMI; body mass index.
Figure 1Anthropometric indices before and after bariatric surgery. BMI: body mass index; FFM: fat free mass; FM: fat mass; WC: waist circumference.
Liver and inflammation status before and after bariatric surgery.
| Variable | Before | After | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liver stiffness measurement, kPa | 6.10 ± 1.25 | 5.42 ± 1.52 | 0.002 |
| AST (IU/L) | 21 (17.00; 29.00) | 19 (16.00; 25.00) | 0.027 |
| ALT (IU/L) | 25 (17.00; 38.50) | 16.5 (12.00; 25.00) | <0.001 |
| GGT (IU/L) | 27 (20.00; 34.50) | 14 (11.00; 19.00) | <0.001 |
| ALP (IU/L) | 196.25 ± 53.79 | 222.50 ± 65.61 | <0.001 |
| Platelets (number/μL) | 303.43 ± 71.20 | 280.47 ± 66.12 | <0.001 |
| FIB 4 | 0.53 (0.37; 0.73) | 0.66 (0.43; 0.94) | <0.001 |
| NFS | −1.35 (−2.44; −0.39) | −2.40 (−3.16; −1.41) | <0.001 |
| Steatosis (ultrasonography) (%) | <0.001 | ||
| Grade 0 | 5 (5.5) | 16 (18) | |
| Grade 1 | 19 (21.1) | 47 (52.8) | |
| Grade 2 | 53 (58.8) | 24 (27) | |
| Grade 3 | 13 (14.4) | 2 (2.2) | |
| Hs-CRP (mg/L) | 5.05 (2.40; 13.60) | 1.60 (0.80; 4.02) | <0.001 |
Mean ± SD or median (95% CI); ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; FIB4: fibrosis 4; GGT: gamma glutamyl transferase; hs-CRP: high-sensitive C reactive protein; NFS: NAFLD fibrosis score.
Relationship between baseline hs-CRP and liver status after bariatric surgery.
| hs-CRP (mg/L) | ||
|---|---|---|
| CC | Rho | |
| FIB-4 | 0.057 | 0.657 |
| NFS | 0.002 | 0.985 |
| Fibrosis (elastography) | 0.045 | 0.704 |
| Steatosis (ultrasonography) | 0.164 | 0.154 |
hs-CRP: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; CC: correlation coefficient; FIB4: fibrosis 4; NFS: NAFLD fibrosis score; Rho: Spearman’s correlation coefficient.
Association between baseline hs-CRP levels and liver status and success rate after surgery.
| Parameters |
| OR | 95% CI for OR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||
| Crude Model | FIB4 | 0.914 | −0.001 | −0.013 | 0.012 |
| NFS | 0.967 | 0.001 | −0.041 | 0.043 | |
| Success rate | 0.829 | 0.994 | 0.940 | 1.050 | |
| Fibrosis (Elastography) | 0.688 | 1.014 | 0.947 | 1.085 | |
| Steatosis (Sonography) | 0.077 | 1.05 | 0.99 | 1.11 | |
| Adjusted Model | FIB4 * | 0.866 | −0.018 | −0.237 | 0.200 |
| NFS ** | 0.442 | 0.254 | −0.403 | 0.912 | |
| Success rate * | 0.479 | 1.466 | 0.508 | 4.226 | |
| Fibrosis * (Elastography) | 0.389 | −0.382 | −1.264 | 0.499 | |
| Steatosis * (Sonography) | 0.674 | 0.206 | 0.753 | 1.165 | |
Log-transformed hs-CRP values were used. Logistic regression analysis for log-hs-CRP and success rate. Linear regression analysis for log-hs-CRP and FIB4, NFS and Fibrosis. Ordinal regression analysis for log-hs-CRP and Steatosis. * Model adjusted for sex, waist circumference, HOMA-IR, GGT, ALP. ** Model adjusted for sex, GGT, ALP.