| Literature DB >> 27594839 |
Anne-Sophie Schneck1, Rodolphe Anty1, Stéphanie Patouraux2, Stéphanie Bonnafous1, Déborah Rousseau3, Cynthia Lebeaupin3, Beatrice Bailly-Maitre3, Arnaud Sans4, Albert Tran1, Jean Gugenheim1, Antonio Iannelli1, Philippe Gual3.
Abstract
The long-term effects of bariatric surgery on non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), focusing on liver injury and hepatocyte apoptosis, are not well-established. We here performed a longitudinal study with paired liver biopsies of nine morbidly obese women (median BMI: 42 [38.7; 45.1] kg/m(2)) with NASH with a median follow-up of 55 [44; 75] months after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) surgery. LRYGB surgery was associated with significant weight loss (median BMI loss -13.7 [-16.4; -9.5] kg/m(2)), improved hepatic steatosis in all patients (55.5% with total resolution), and resolution of hepatic inflammation and hepatocyte ballooning in 100 and 88.8% of cases, respectively. Alanine aminotransferase levels dropped to normal values while hepatic activated cleaved caspase-3 levels strongly decreased after a median follow-up of 55 months. Hepatocyte apoptosis, as evaluated by serum caspase-generated keratin-18 fragment, improved within the first year following LRYGB and these improvements persisted for at least 55 months. LRYGB in morbidly obese patients with NASH is thus associated with a long-lasting beneficial impact on hepatic steatohepatitis and hepatocyte death.Entities:
Keywords: NAFLD; NASH; bariatric surgery; liver; obesity; steatosis
Year: 2016 PMID: 27594839 PMCID: PMC4990543 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00344
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Patients' clinical and biochemical parameters at baseline and after a ≥ 40-month follow-up period (patients with paired liver biopsies).
| Number | 9 | 9 | ns |
| Time after surgery (months) (median, Q1; Q3) | 55 (44; 75) | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) (median, Q1; Q3) | 42.0 (38.7; 45.1) | 27.1 (24.3; 31.8) | 0.042 |
| Δ BMI (kg/m2) (median, Q1; Q3) | −13.7 (−16.4; −9.5) | ||
| Fasting glucose (mmol/l) (median, Q1; Q3) | 7.3 (5.3; 9.0) | 4.7 (3.8; 5.5) | 0.031 |
| Fasting insulin (mUI/l) (median, Q1; Q3) | 24.7 (18.0; 33.0) | 11.8 (6.5; 19.2) | 0.032 |
| HOMA-IR (median, Q1; Q3) | 7.4 (3.5; 10.8) | 1.9 (1.3; 3.5) | 0.008 |
| Diabetes (%) | 4 (44) | 0 (0) | ns |
| Metabolic syndrome (%) | 7 (77) | 2 (22) | ns |
| CRP (mg/dl) (median, Q1; Q3) | 7.7 (5.7; 9.6) | 0.6 (0.4; 2.4) | 0.004 |
T0, baseline; T ≥ 40, after a ≥ 40-month follow-up period. BMI, Body-mass index; Δ BMI, Excess BMI loss; HOMA-IR, Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance; CRP, C-reactive protein; ns, not significant; p, the Mann-Whitney test or Fisher's exact test.
Patients' clinical and biochemical parameters at baseline and after a 12-month follow-up period (patients without a second liver biopsy).
| Number | 75 | 30 | 30 | |
| Gender (F/M) | 57/18 | 23/7 | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) (median, Q1; Q3) | 43.7 (40.2; 47.2) | 45.5 (41.0; 48.6) | 28.8 (25.5; 32.3) | <0.001 |
| Δ BMI (kg/m2) (median, Q1; Q3) | −15.1 (−19.9; −13.4) | |||
| Fasting glucose (mmol/l) (median, Q1; Q3) | 5.5 (5.1; 7.4) | 5.8 (5.1; 9.7) | 4.7 (4.1; 5.2) | <0.001 |
| Fasting insulin (mUI/l) (median, Q1; Q3) | 28.0 (18.0; 44.0) | 27.0 (17.2; 39.5) | 6.8 (4.9; 12.0) | <0.001 |
| HOMA-IR (median, Q1; Q3) | 7.8 (4.8; 12.4) | 7.6 (5.8; 11.3) | 1.3 (1.0; 2.1) | <0.001 |
| Diabetes (%) | 32 (42.6) | 18(60) | 4 (13.3) | <0.001 |
| Metabolic syndrome (%) | 36 (48) | 21 (70) | 9 (30) | 0.002 |
| CRP (mg/dl) (median, Q1; Q3) | 9.0 (6.0; 14.5) | 9.0 (6.8; 14.5) | 2.9 (1.1; 4.1) | <0.001 |
| ALT (IU/L) (median, Q1; Q3) | 50.5 (36.0; 72.5) | 53.5 (35.7; 69.5) | 24.0 (18.0; 32.0) | <0.001 |
| NAS (grade) (median, Q1; Q3) | 5.0 (5.0; 5.0) | 5.0 (5.0; 5.0) |
T0, baseline; T12, 12-month follow-up. BMI, Body-mass index; Δ BMI, Excess BMI loss; HOMA-IR, Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance; CRP, C-reactive protein; ns, not significant; p, the Mann-Whitney test or Fisher's exact test.
Figure 1Liver histology analysis of two representative patients (P1 and P2) at baseline and ≥40-months after LRYGB. (A) Liver steatosis was improved (HES staining, x40). (B) Ballooned hepatocytes and hepatic inflammation, both present at baseline, were no longer present on the second liver biopsy (HES staining, x40). (C) P1 had bridging fibrosis (F = 3), P2 had zone three sinusoidal fibrosis and peri-portal sinusoidal fibrosis (F = 2). The second liver biopsy showed a significant improvement in fibrosis (F = 0) in both patients (Sirius red straining, x40). T0, baseline; T ≥ 40, after a ≥40-month follow-up period.
Figure 2LRYGB in NASH patients improves hepatic steatosis and inflammation in all patients, and improves hepatic fibrosis in the large majority after a median follow-up of 55 months. Nine morbidly obese patients with biopsy-proven NASH underwent LRYGB and had a second liver biopsy at a median follow-up period of 55 [44; 75] months after surgery. From the paired liver biopsies, steatosis (A), inflammatory foci (B), hepatocellular ballooning (C), and fibrosis (E) were evaluated. (D) The NAFLD activity score (NAS) was evaluated as described in Section Materials and Methods. Fibrosis was semi-quantitatively evaluated as follows: 0, none; 1, perisinusoidal or periportal mild (1A); 2, moderate (1B); 3, portal/periportal (1C); 4, perisinusoidal and portal/periportal; 5, bridging fibrosis; 6, cirrhosis. (N) = number of patients.
Figure 3LRYGB improves liver injury and hepatocyte apoptosis in NASH patients after a median follow-up of 55 months. Serum levels of (A) alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and (B) a marker of hepatocyte apoptosis [caspase-generated keratin 18 fragment (K18 fragment)] and (D) hepatic levels of cleaved caspase 3 were evaluated at baseline and at the median follow-up of 55 [44; 75] months after LRYGB in NASH patients. The levels of K18 fragment were also evaluated (C) at 6 months and at 1 year after a LRYGB and, (E) at baseline (T0) and 1 year (T12) after LRYGB in three additional groups of patients without NAFLD (n = 5), severe steatosis (n = 7), or NASH (n = 7). Results are expressed as the median [25th, 75th percentiles] (A,C,E).