| Literature DB >> 33918414 |
Athanasios Moustogiannis1, Anastassios Philippou1, Orjona Taso1, Evangelos Zevolis1, Maria Pappa2, Antonios Chatzigeorgiou1, Michael Koutsilieris1.
Abstract
The process of myogenesis gradually deteriorates as the skeletal muscle ages, contributing to muscle mass loss. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of senescence/aging on skeletal myogenesis, in vitro. A model of multiple cell divisions of C2C12 myoblasts was used to replicate cell senescence. Control and aged myoblasts were investigated during myogenesis, i.e., at days 0, 2, and 6of differentiation. SA-β-gal activity and comet assay were used as markers of aging and DNA damage. Flow cytometry was performed to characterize potential differences in cell cycle between control and aged cells. Alterations in the mRNA and/or protein expression of myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs), IGF-1 isoforms, apoptotic, atrophy, inflammatory, metabolic and aging-related factors were evaluated. Compared with the control cells, aged myoblasts exhibited G0/G1 cell cycle arrest, DNA damage, increased SA-β-gal activity, and increased expression of aging-related factors p16 and p21 during differentiation. Moreover, aged myoblasts showed a reduction in the expression of MRFs and metabolic/anabolic factors, along with an increased expression of apoptotic, atrophy and inflammatory factors. A diminished differentiation capacity characterized the aged myoblasts which, in combination with the induction of apoptotic and atrophy factors, indicated a disrupted myogenic lineage in the senescent muscle cells.Entities:
Keywords: aging; cellular senescence; muscle atrophy; myoblasts; myogenesis; sarcopenia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33918414 PMCID: PMC8038215 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22073721
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1(A) Effects of myoblast senescence on cell cycle progression. Percentages of cells in each phase arerepresented for the control and aged myoblasts. In contrast to the controls, the aged myoblasts exhibited an aging phenotype with an arrest of cell cycle progression, i.e., increased number of cells (%) in the G1 phase along with a reduction incell number in the G2/M phase. (B) Increased SA-β-gal activity as a result of myoblast aging. Representative images of the increased SA-β-gal-positive blue-green stain cells in the aged myoblast cultures. (C) Increased DNA damage as a result of myoblast aging. Representative alkaline comet assay images of aged myoblasts and control cells. (D) Quantification of the endogenous DNA damage in aged myoblasts compared to controls. (E,F) Effects of myoblast aging on the expression of cellular senescence-associated proteins p16 and p21. Three independent experiments were performed, and 200 cells per sample were scored. Representative Western blots and immunoblotting quantification of p16 (E) and p21 (F) expression in aged myoblasts compared to controls in the second day of their differentiation process. The expressions of the proteins were normalized to each corresponding GAPDH on the same immunoblot (Mean ± SE of 3 independent experiments performed in triplicate; * p < 0.05).
Figure 2(A–D) Myogenic regulatory factor expression during myoblast differentiation. Quantitative analysis of the muscle-specific transcription factors MyF5 (A), MyoD (B), myogenin (C) and MRF4 (D) mRNA expression in aged myoblasts compared to controls during their differentiation processes. The mRNA expression values of MRFs in aged myoblasts have been normalized to the corresponding GAPDH mRNA and are expressed as fold changes compared to control cells. (E,F) Effects of myoblast aging on their expression of the myogenic regulatory factors MyoD and myogenin. Representative Western blots and immunoblotting quantification of MyoD (E) and myogenin (F) in aged myoblasts compared to control cells during their differentiation process. The values of the proteins of interest were normalized to each corresponding GAPDH on the same immunoblot. (G) Morphology-based analysis of control and aged C2C12 myoblasts during differentiation. Bright-field microscopy shows delayed myotubes formation in the aged myoblasts compared with the control cells over time, during myogenesis. (H) MyHC and DAPI immunostaining revealed a substantial reduction inmyotubes in aged cells. (I) Fusion index and (J) maturation index values were calculated in control and aged myotubes immunostained with MyHC. Myotubes were considered differentiated cells that contained more than three nuclei. The fusion index was defined as the percentage of nuclei present in myotubes over the total number of nuclei present in the observed field, while maturation index was defined as the percentage of nuclei present in myotubes that contained more than 10 nuclei over the total number of nuclei present in the observed field. (K,L) Morphological analysis of myotubes observed after 2 and 6 days of differentiation at both control and aged groups. Length and width of myotubes of each group have been measured and reported as mean values in the graph. Data wereselected from 10 different and randomly chosen microscopic fields. (Mean ± SE of 3 independent experiments performed in triplicate; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p <0.001).
Figure 3(A,B)Effects of myoblast aging on the expression of IGF-1 isoforms. Quantitative analysis of IGF-1Ea (A) and IGF-1Eb (B) mRNA expression in aged myoblasts compared to controls during their differentiation. (C–E) Effects of myoblast aging on the expression of muscle atrophy genes during myoblast differentiation. Quantitative analysis of myostatin (C), Murf1 (D) and Atrogin1 (E) mRNA expression in senescent myoblasts compared to control cells during their myogenic differentiation. (F,G) Effects of myoblast aging on the expression of inflammatory and metabolic factors. Quantitative analysis of IL-6 (F) and PPAR-γ (G) mRNA expression in senescent myoblasts compared to control cells during their differentiation. The mRNA values of the factors of interest in aged myoblasts have been normalized to the corresponding GAPDH mRNA and are expressed as fold changes compared to control myoblasts. (Mean ± SE of 3 independent experiments performed in triplicate; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 4(A–C) Effects of myoblast aging on the expression of pro-apoptotic genes during myogenic differentiation. Quantitative analysis of FoxO1 (A), FUCA (B), and p53 (C) mRNA expression in aged myoblasts compared to controls during their differentiation. The mRNA expression values of pro-apoptotic factors in the aged myoblasts have been normalized to the corresponding GAPDH mRNA and are expressed as fold changes compared to control myoblasts. (D,E) Effects of myoblast aging on the expression of pro-apoptotic proteins FoxO1 and p53.Representative Western blots and immunoblotting quantification of FoxO1 (D) and p53 (E) in aged myoblasts compared to control cells during their myogenic differentiation. The values of the apoptotic proteins were normalized to each corresponding GAPDH on the same immunoblot. (F,G) Effects of myoblast aging on cell death (Annexin-PI). (F) Histograms from a representative experiment show the apoptotic effect of senescence on myoblasts. The percentages of necrotic, live, early apoptotic, and late apoptotic cells are displayed in R1, R2, R3 and R4, respectively. (G) Bar graphs show that senescence induced the apoptosis of (aged) myoblasts. Quantitative results (R2–R4) are displayed aspercentagechanges compared to the control. (Mean ± SE of 3 independent experiments performed in triplicate; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
The sequences of the specific sets of primers used for RT-PCR analyses.
| Target Gene | 5′-3′ Forward Primer Sequence | 5′-3′ Reverse Primer Sequence | Product Length |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| CAA CTC CCT CAA GAT TGT CAG CAA | GGC ATG GAC TGT GGT CAT GA | 118 |
|
| CTA TTA CAG CCT GCC GGG AC | CTC GGA TGG CTC TGT AGA CG | 232 |
|
| TGC TCC TTT GAG ACA GCA GA | AGT AGG GAA GTG TGC GTG CT | 141 |
|
| AGG AGA GAA AGA TGG AGT CCA GAG | TAA CAA AAG AAG TCA CCC CAA GAG | 430 |
|
| AGG GCT CTC CTT TGT ATC CAG | TGG AAG AAA GGC GCT GAA GA | 579 |
|
| GTG GAC GCT CTT CAG TTC GT | GCT TCC TTT TCT TGT GTG TCG ATA G | 262 |
|
| GTC CCC AGC ACA CAT CGC G | TCT TTT GTG CAA AAT AAG GCG TA | 259 |
|
| TTT GGT CGG TGA GTT GGG AG | CCA TTC CAA GAG CGA GTG GT | 76 |
|
| AGT GGA TGG TGA AGA GCG TG | GAA GGG ACA GAT TGT GGC GA | 96 |
|
| GAG AGA CCG CCG TAC AGA AG | AGC AGT TTG GGC TTT CCT CC | 317 |
|
| CTG TAA CCT TCC CAG GAC CA | GCA GTC AAG CCC AAA GTC TC | 104 |
|
| AGG GCT CCC CAC CAC CTG TGT | TGC CCT CTC TAG GCC ACC G | 310 |
|
| AAC AAG GAG GTA TAC AGT AAG G | AAT TGT TCA TGA AGT TCT TTT G | 322 |
|
| CTA TGA ACT CCT TCT CCA CAA GCG CCT T | GGG GCG GCT ACA TCT TTG GAA TCT T | 301 |
|
| GTT CAT GCT TGT GAA GGA TGC | ACT CTG GAT TCA GCT GGT CG | 359 |