Literature DB >> 19139404

Distinct mechanisms act in concert to mediate cell cycle arrest.

Jared E Toettcher1, Alexander Loewer, Gerard J Ostheimer, Michael B Yaffe, Bruce Tidor, Galit Lahav.   

Abstract

In response to DNA damage, cells arrest at specific stages in the cell cycle. This arrest must fulfill at least 3 requirements: it must be activated promptly; it must be sustained as long as damage is present to prevent loss of genomic information; and after the arrest, cells must re-enter into the appropriate cell cycle phase to ensure proper ploidy. Multiple molecular mechanisms capable of arresting the cell cycle have been identified in mammalian cells; however, it is unknown whether each mechanism meets all 3 requirements or whether they act together to confer specific functions to the arrest. To address this question, we integrated mathematical models describing the cell cycle and the DNA damage signaling networks and tested the contributions of each mechanism to cell cycle arrest and re-entry. Predictions from this model were then tested with quantitative experiments to identify the combined action of arrest mechanisms in irradiated cells. We find that different arrest mechanisms serve indispensable roles in the proper cellular response to DNA damage over time: p53-independent cyclin inactivation confers immediate arrest, whereas p53-dependent cyclin downregulation allows this arrest to be sustained. Additionally, p21-mediated inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase activity is indispensable for preventing improper cell cycle re-entry and endoreduplication. This work shows that in a complex signaling network, seemingly redundant mechanisms, acting in a concerted fashion, can achieve a specific cellular outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19139404      PMCID: PMC2630102          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0806196106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  38 in total

1.  The tumour suppressor protein p53 can repress transcription of cyclin B.

Authors:  K Krause; M Wasner; W Reinhard; U Haugwitz; C L Dohna; J Mössner; K Engeland
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  p21 inhibits Thr161 phosphorylation of Cdc2 to enforce the G2 DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  V A Smits; R Klompmaker; T Vallenius; G Rijksen; T P Mäkela; R H Medema
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-09-29       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Toward maintaining the genome: DNA damage and replication checkpoints.

Authors:  Kara A Nyberg; Rhett J Michelson; Charles W Putnam; Ted A Weinert
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2002-06-11       Impact factor: 16.830

Review 4.  The p53-Mdm2 module and the ubiquitin system.

Authors:  Dan Michael; Moshe Oren
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 15.707

5.  Cyclin E ablation in the mouse.

Authors:  Yan Geng; Qunyan Yu; Ewa Sicinska; Manjusri Das; Jürgen E Schneider; Shoumo Bhattacharya; William M Rideout; Roderick T Bronson; Humphrey Gardner; Piotr Sicinski
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-08-22       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Checkpoint kinase 2 (Chk2) monomers or dimers phosphorylate Cdc25C after DNA damage regardless of threonine 68 phosphorylation.

Authors:  Jinwoo Ahn; Carol Prives
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-10-16       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Ataxia telangiectasia-mutated phosphorylates Chk2 in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  S Matsuoka; G Rotman; A Ogawa; Y Shiloh; K Tamai; S J Elledge
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The human homologs of checkpoint kinases Chk1 and Cds1 (Chk2) phosphorylate p53 at multiple DNA damage-inducible sites.

Authors:  S Y Shieh; J Ahn; K Tamai; Y Taya; C Prives
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  p130/E2F4 binds to and represses the cdc2 promoter in response to p53.

Authors:  W R Taylor; A H Schonthal; J Galante; G R Stark
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-10-13       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  Living on a break: cellular senescence as a DNA-damage response.

Authors:  Fabrizio d'Adda di Fagagna
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 60.716

View more
  50 in total

1.  Metabolite profiling identifies a key role for glycine in rapid cancer cell proliferation.

Authors:  Mohit Jain; Roland Nilsson; Sonia Sharma; Nikhil Madhusudhan; Toshimori Kitami; Amanda L Souza; Ran Kafri; Marc W Kirschner; Clary B Clish; Vamsi K Mootha
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Systems biology: perspectives on multiscale modeling in research on endocrine-related cancers.

Authors:  Robert Clarke; John J Tyson; Ming Tan; William T Baumann; Lu Jin; Jianhua Xuan; Yue Wang
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 5.678

3.  Mathematical modeling to distinguish cell cycle arrest and cell killing in chemotherapeutic concentration response curves.

Authors:  Salaheldin S Hamed; Charles M Roth
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 2.745

4.  Disorder and residual helicity alter p53-Mdm2 binding affinity and signaling in cells.

Authors:  Wade Borcherds; François-Xavier Theillet; Andrea Katzer; Ana Finzel; Katie M Mishall; Anne T Powell; Hongwei Wu; Wanda Manieri; Christoph Dieterich; Philipp Selenko; Alexander Loewer; Gary W Daughdrill
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 15.040

Review 5.  Senescence from G2 arrest, revisited.

Authors:  Véronique Gire; Vjekoslav Dulic
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 6.  Understanding resistance to combination chemotherapy.

Authors:  Justin R Pritchard; Douglas A Lauffenburger; Michael T Hemann
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  2012-11-17       Impact factor: 18.500

Review 7.  Dynamic modelling of oestrogen signalling and cell fate in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  John J Tyson; William T Baumann; Chun Chen; Anael Verdugo; Iman Tavassoly; Yue Wang; Louis M Weiner; Robert Clarke
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Quantitative live cell imaging reveals a gradual shift between DNA repair mechanisms and a maximal use of HR in mid S phase.

Authors:  Ketki Karanam; Ran Kafri; Alexander Loewer; Galit Lahav
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  Stress-specific response of the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop.

Authors:  Alexander Hunziker; Mogens H Jensen; Sandeep Krishna
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2010-07-12

Review 10.  Cancer systems biology: a network modeling perspective.

Authors:  Pamela K Kreeger; Douglas A Lauffenburger
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 4.944

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.