| Literature DB >> 33917686 |
Katrina Cruz1, Yu-Hsiu Wang1,2, Shaina A Oake1, Paul A Janmey1.
Abstract
Filamentous anionic polyelectrolytes are common in biological materials. Some examples are the cytoskeletal filaments that assemble into networks and bundled structures to give the cell mechanical resistance and that act as surfaces on which enzymes and other molecules can dock. Some viruses, especially bacteriophages are also long thin polyelectrolytes, and their bending stiffness is similar to those of the intermediate filament class of cytoskeletal polymers. These relatively stiff, thin, and long polyelectrolytes have charge densities similar to those of more flexible polyelectrolytes such as DNA, hyaluronic acid, and polyacrylates, and they can form interpenetrating networks and viscoelastic gels at volume fractions far below those at which more flexible polymers form hydrogels. In this report, we examine how different types of divalent and multivalent counterions interact with two biochemically different but physically similar filamentous polyelectrolytes: Pf1 virus and vimentin intermediate filaments (VIF). Different divalent cations aggregate both polyelectrolytes similarly, but transition metal ions are more efficient than alkaline earth ions and their efficiency increases with increasing atomic weight. Comparison of these two different types of polyelectrolyte filaments enables identification of general effects of counterions with polyelectrolytes and can identify cases where the interaction of the counterions and the filaments exhibits stronger and more specific interactions than those of counterion condensation.Entities:
Keywords: Pf1 virus; counterion; rheology; vimentin
Year: 2021 PMID: 33917686 PMCID: PMC8167600 DOI: 10.3390/gels7020041
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gels ISSN: 2310-2861
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the polyelectrolyte filaments Pf1 virus and vimentin intermediate filaments (VIF). Electrostatic potentials are adapted from ref [1]. Red is negative, and blue is positive. Sketches on the right represent the configuration of 2 µm filaments with the persistence lengths (LP) of these polyelectrolytes.
Figure 2Gelation of Pf1 virus by Mn2+. (A). Atomic force micrograph of Pf1 virus in suspensions of variable amounts of Mn2+. (B). Creep and recovery of Pf1 suspensions with 10 mM Mg2+ or Mn2+ after imposition of a constant shear stress. (C). Compliance at 10 s of Pf1 suspensions with various concentrations of Mn2+. Error bars denote standard errors of separate experiments imposing 0.04 to 0.2 Pa shear stress.
Figure 3Counterion dependent attraction of like charged polyelectrolytes by various divalent and higher valence cations. (A). Changes in apparent size calculated from the diffusion constant as measured by decay of light scattering autocorrelation function for initial suspensions of single virus as they are titrated with increasing concentrations of biologically relevant alkaline earth and transition metal ions. (B). Comparison of the efficiency of different metal counterions to aggregate Pf1 and vimentin intermediate filaments (VIFs). Error bars denote standard errors for experiments in which 3 separate preparations of Pf1 or VIFs were titrated by the counterions. In all cases the correlation functions were averages of at least five different measurements of the same sample.
Figure 4Critical bundling concentrations of different cations for both Pf1 and VIFs correlate with the metal ion softness but not their radii. (A). The critical bundling concentrations of different metal ions linearly correlates with the Gibbs free energy of the formation of metal ions, a natural index of Lewis acid softness. (B). The trends in the critical bundling concentrations could not be explained by the size effect of the metal ions. The hydrated radii of the metal ions are shown on the right and the naked ionic radii are shown on the left. The beige color on both panels highlights the alkaline earth metals; the light green and blue color highlight the early and late transition metals in the same period, respectively.