Literature DB >> 33909112

The role of somatosensation in automatic visuo-motor control: a comparison of congenital and acquired sensory loss.

R Chris Miall1, Daria Afanasyeva2, Jonathan D Cole3, Peggy Mason4.   

Abstract

Studies of chronically deafferented participants have illuminated how regaining some motor control after adult-onset loss of proprioceptive and touch input depends heavily on cognitive control. In this study we contrasted the performance of one such man, IW, with KS, a woman born without any somatosensory fibres. We postulated that her life-long absence of proprioception and touch might have allowed her to automate some simple visually-guided actions, something IW appears unable to achieve. We tested these two, and two age-matched control groups, on writing and drawing tasks performed with and without an audio-verbal echoing task that added a cognitive demand. In common with other studies of skilled action, the dual task was shown to affect visuo-motor performance in controls, with less well-controlled drawing and writing, evident as increases in path speed and reduction in curvature and trial duration. We found little evidence that IW was able to automate even the simplest drawing tasks and no evidence for automaticity in his writing. In contrast, KS showed a selective increase in speed of signature writing under the dual-task conditions, suggesting some ability to automate her most familiar writing. We also tested tracing of templates under mirror-reversed conditions, a task that imposes a powerful cognitive planning challenge. Both IW and KS showed evidence of a visuo-motor planning conflict, as did the controls, for shapes with sharp corners. Overall, IW was much faster than his controls to complete tracing shapes, consistent with an absence of visuo-proprioceptive conflict, whereas KS was slower than her controls, especially as the corners became sharper. She dramatically improved after a short period of practice while IW did not. We conclude that KS, who developed from birth without proprioception, may have some visually derived control of movement not under cognitive control, something not seen in IW. This allowed her to automate some writing and drawing actions, but impaired her initial attempts at mirror-tracing. In contrast, IW, who lost somatosensation as an adult, cannot automate these visually guided actions.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automaticity; Drawing; Human movement; Mirror-tracing; Proprioception; Somatosensation; Writing

Year:  2021        PMID: 33909112     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06110-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  23 in total

1.  When paying attention becomes counterproductive: impact of divided versus skill-focused attention on novice and experienced performance of sensorimotor skills.

Authors:  Sian L Beilock; Thomas H Carr; Clare MacMahon; Janet L Starkes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2002-03

2.  Haste does not always make waste: expertise, direction of attention, and speed versus accuracy in performing sensorimotor skills.

Authors:  Sian L Beilock; Bennett I Bertenthal; Annette M McCoy; Thomas H Carr
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04

3.  Role of proprioception and vision in handwriting.

Authors:  Marie-Claude Hepp-Reymond; Vihren Chakarov; Jürgen Schulte-Mönting; Frank Huethe; Rumyana Kristeva
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Reachability judgement in optic ataxia: Effect of peripheral vision on hand and target perception in depth.

Authors:  Angela Bartolo; Yves Rossetti; Patrice Revol; Christian Urquizar; Laure Pisella; Yann Coello
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  The effects of dual tasking on handwriting in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  S Broeder; E Nackaerts; A Nieuwboer; B C M Smits-Engelsman; S P Swinnen; E Heremans
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-01-19       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Impairments of reaching movements in patients without proprioception. I. Spatial errors.

Authors:  J Gordon; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Specificity of reflex adaptation for task-relevant variability.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Secondary tasks impair adaptation to step- and gradual-visual displacements.

Authors:  J M Galea; S A Sami; N B Albert; R C Miall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Visuomotor feedback gains upregulate during the learning of novel dynamics.

Authors:  Sae Franklin; Daniel M Wolpert; David W Franklin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  On the Auditory-Proprioception Substitution Hypothesis: Movement Sonification in Two Deafferented Subjects Learning to Write New Characters.

Authors:  Jérémy Danna; Jean-Luc Velay
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  1 in total

1.  The role of somatosensation in automatic visuo-motor control: a comparison of congenital and acquired sensory loss.

Authors:  R Chris Miall; Daria Afanasyeva; Jonathan D Cole; Peggy Mason
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 1.972

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.