Literature DB >> 19463909

Role of proprioception and vision in handwriting.

Marie-Claude Hepp-Reymond1, Vihren Chakarov, Jürgen Schulte-Mönting, Frank Huethe, Rumyana Kristeva.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to better understand the role of proprioception in handwriting and test earlier conclusions stating that the automated shaping of letters was not impaired by the removal of visual control in deafferentation. To this aim we compared the performance of the deafferented patient GL, who suffers from a complete loss of cutaneous and proprioceptive sensation, with that of eight healthy age- and sex-matched subjects. The word "Parallele", written within a short sentence with and without visual control, was quantified using a digital writing tablet. Three of the 13 analyzed parameters were strikingly different in patient GL compared to healthy subjects, both with and without vision: increase of number of pen touches, increase in number of inversions in velocity, and decrease of mean stroke frequency. The changes in these three parameters indicate a strong impairment in automated behaviour in the absence of proprioception and touch. This impairment is also supported by the significantly longer movement duration, which is also significantly increased by the removal of visual control. The present study provides for the first time a quantification of handwriting in a completely deafferented patient and reveals the central role of proprioception for the storage, updating, and maintenance of skilled motor programs. The fact that the deficits are already present with visual feedback suggests that the role of vision in handwriting is only secondary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19463909     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2009.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Bull        ISSN: 0361-9230            Impact factor:   4.077


  8 in total

1.  Overpressure on fingertips prevents state estimation of the pen grip force and movement accuracy.

Authors:  Jérémy Danna; Mathilde Nordlund; Didier Louber; Simon Moré; Laurence Mouchnino
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The role of somatosensation in automatic visuo-motor control: a comparison of congenital and acquired sensory loss.

Authors:  R Chris Miall; Daria Afanasyeva; Jonathan D Cole; Peggy Mason
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Variability of grip kinetics during adult signature writing.

Authors:  Bassma Ghali; Nayanashri Thalanki Anantha; Jennifer Chan; Tom Chau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Evaluation of Handwriting Movement Kinematics: From an Ecological to a Magnetic Resonance Environment.

Authors:  Ambra Bisio; Ludovico Pedullà; Laura Bonzano; Piero Ruggeri; Giampaolo Brichetto; Marco Bove
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  The correlation between proprioception and handwriting legibility in children.

Authors:  So Young Hong; Nam-Hae Jung; Kyeong Mi Kim
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-10-28

6.  On the Auditory-Proprioception Substitution Hypothesis: Movement Sonification in Two Deafferented Subjects Learning to Write New Characters.

Authors:  Jérémy Danna; Jean-Luc Velay
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  The Propagation of Movement Variability in Time: A Methodological Approach for Discrete Movements with Multiple Degrees of Freedom.

Authors:  Melanie Krüger; Andreas Straube; Thomas Eggert
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 8.  Basic and supplementary sensory feedback in handwriting.

Authors:  Jérémy Danna; Jean-Luc Velay
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.