Literature DB >> 32979218

The explicit/implicit distinction in studies of visuomotor learning: Conceptual and methodological pitfalls.

Alkis M Hadjiosif1, John W Krakauer1,2,3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2020        PMID： 32979218     DOI： 10.1111/ejn.14984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN： 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Assessing and defining explicit processes in visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  S Heirani Moghaddam; R Chua; E K Cressman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Individual sensorimotor adaptation characteristics are independent across orofacial speech movements and limb reaching movements.

Authors:  Nick M Kitchen; Kwang S Kim; Prince Z Wang; Robert J Hermosillo; Ludo Max
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.974

3.  Speech auditory-motor adaptation to formant-shifted feedback lacks an explicit component: Reduced adaptation in adults who stutter reflects limitations in implicit sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Kwang S Kim; Ludo Max
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Differential contributions of implicit and explicit learning mechanisms to various contextual cues in dual adaptation.

Authors:  Maria N Ayala; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Mechanisms of Human Motor Learning Do Not Function Independently.

Authors:  Amanda S Therrien; Aaron L Wong
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.473

6.  Residual errors in visuomotor adaptation persist despite extended motor preparation periods.

Authors:  Matthew Weightman; John-Stuart Brittain; R Chris Miall; Ned Jenkinson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.714
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.