Literature DB >> 16506003

Dissociable effects of the implicit and explicit memory systems on learning control of reaching.

Eun Jung Hwang1, Maurice A Smith, Reza Shadmehr.   

Abstract

Adaptive control of reaching depends on internal models that associate states in which the limb experienced a force perturbation with motor commands that can compensate for it. Limb state can be sensed via both vision and proprioception. However, adaptation of reaching in novel dynamics results in generalization in the intrinsic coordinates of the limb, suggesting that the proprioceptive states in which the limb was perturbed dominate representation of limb state. To test this hypothesis, we considered a task where position of the hand during a reach was correlated with patterns of force perturbation. This correlation could be sensed via vision, proprioception, or both. As predicted, when the correlations could be sensed only via proprioception, learning was significantly better as compared to when the correlations could only be sensed through vision. We found that learning with visual correlations resulted in subjects who could verbally describe the patterns of perturbations but this awareness was never observed in subjects who learned the task with only proprioceptive correlations. We manipulated the relative values of the visual and proprioceptive parameters and found that the probability of becoming aware strongly depended on the correlations that subjects could visually observe. In all conditions, aware subjects demonstrated a small but significant advantage in their ability to adapt their motor commands. Proprioceptive correlations produced an internal model that strongly influenced reaching performance yet did not lead to awareness. Visual correlations strongly increased the probability of becoming aware, yet had a much smaller but still significant effect on reaching performance. Therefore, practice resulted in acquisition of both implicit and explicit internal models.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16506003      PMCID: PMC1628349          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0391-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  27 in total

1.  Becoming aware of motor skill.

Authors:  D B. Willingham
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Reaches to sounds encoded in an eye-centered reference frame.

Authors:  Y E Cohen; R A Andersen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Direct visuomotor transformations for reaching.

Authors:  Christopher A Buneo; Murray R Jarvis; Aaron P Batista; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Transfer of motor learning across arm configurations.

Authors:  Nicole Malfait; Douglas M Shiller; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Direct comparison of neural systems mediating conscious and unconscious skill learning.

Authors:  Daniel B Willingham; Joanna Salidis; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Is interlimb transfer of force-field adaptation a cognitive response to the sudden introduction of load?

Authors:  Nicole Malfait; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Reaching movements with similar hand paths but different arm orientations. I. Activity of individual cells in motor cortex.

Authors:  S H Scott; J F Kalaska
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience.

Authors:  M A Conditt; F Gandolfo; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Explicit and implicit learning and maps of cortical motor output.

Authors:  M A Stadler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-09-09       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Multisensory integration during motor planning.

Authors:  Samuel J Sober; Philip N Sabes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  51 in total

1.  In the absence of physical practice, observation and imagery do not result in updating of internal models for aiming.

Authors:  Nicole T Ong; Beverley C Larssen; Nicola J Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  To transfer or not to transfer? Kinematics and laterality quotient predict interlimb transfer of motor learning.

Authors:  Hannah Z Lefumat; Jean-Louis Vercher; R Chris Miall; Jonathan Cole; Frank Buloup; Lionel Bringoux; Christophe Bourdin; Fabrice R Sarlegna
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Asymmetric interlimb transfer of concurrent adaptation to opposing dynamic forces.

Authors:  J M Galea; R C Miall; D G Woolley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  State dependence of adaptation of force output following movement observation.

Authors:  Paul A Wanda; Gang Li; Kurt A Thoroughman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Vestibular benefits to task savings in motor adaptation.

Authors:  A M E Sarwary; L P J Selen; W P Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Did I do that? Detecting a perturbation to visual feedback in a reaching task.

Authors:  Elon Gaffin-Cahn; Todd E Hudson; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Explicit and implicit contributions to learning in a sensorimotor adaptation task.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; John W Krakauer; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Acquisition of internal models of motor tasks in children with autism.

Authors:  Jennifer C Gidley Larson; Amy J Bastian; Opher Donchin; Reza Shadmehr; Stewart H Mostofsky
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Consolidation patterns of human motor memory.

Authors:  Sarah E Criscimagna-Hemminger; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Separation of visual and motor workspaces during targeted reaching results in limited generalization of visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Yuming Lei; Michelle J Johnson; Jinsung Wang
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.