Literature DB >> 3390709

Selective attention modifies the active micromechanical properties of the cochlea.

J L Puel1, P Bonfils, R Pujol.   

Abstract

The micromechanical properties of the cochlea accounting for the exquisite properties of sensitivity and frequency selectivity depend on the integrity of an active biomechanism probably based upon a motile activity of outer hair cells (OHCs). Evoked oto-acoustic emissions (EOAEs), i.e. sounds emitted by the cochlea in response to a click, reflect this active biomechanism. We demonstrate here that a selective attention task in human subjects alters EOAEs. This means that the central nervous system can modify active cochlear micromechanics prior to the transduction process, probably by using the medial efferent system which, coming from the brainstem, innervates the OHCs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3390709     DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(88)91144-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  34 in total

1.  The corticofugal system for hearing: recent progress.

Authors:  N Suga; E Gao; Y Zhang; X Ma; J F Olsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Towards a unifying basis of auditory thresholds: the effects of hearing loss on temporal integration reconsidered.

Authors:  Heinrich Neubauer; Peter Heil
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-12

3.  Cells in auditory cortex that project to the cochlear nucleus in guinea pigs.

Authors:  Brett R Schofield; Diana L Coomes; Ryan M Schofield
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-03-24

4.  Time course of the suppression effect on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions by prolonged contralateral acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Hyun Woo Kang; Hyun Joon Shim; Seong Jun Song; Seong Hee Lee; Sang Won Yoon
Journal:  Korean J Audiol       Date:  2012-12-18

5.  Changes in otoacoustic emissions during selective auditory and visual attention.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Auditory attentional filter in the absence of masking noise.

Authors:  Elan Selvi Anandan; Ruby Husain; Kumar Seluakumaran
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Processing Complex Sounds Passing through the Rostral Brainstem: The New Early Filter Model.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Tom A Campbell
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Synchronized Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions Provide a Signal-to-Noise Ratio Advantage in Medial-Olivocochlear Reflex Assays.

Authors:  James D Lewis
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-11-13

9.  No effects of attention or visual perceptual load on cochlear function, as measured with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions Reveal an Efficient Auditory Efferent Network.

Authors:  Viorica Marian; Tuan Q Lam; Sayuri Hayakawa; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.