Literature DB >> 33884380

Auditory Nerve Fiber Health Estimation Using Patient Specific Cochlear Implant Stimulation Models.

Ziteng Liu1, Ahmet Cakir1, Jack H Noble1.   

Abstract

Cochlear implants (CIs) restore hearing using an array of electrodes implanted in the cochlea to directly stimulate auditory nerve fibers (ANFs). Hearing outcomes with CIs are dependent on the health of the ANFs. In this research, we developed an approach to estimate the health of ANFs using patient-customized, image-based computational models of CI stimulation. Our stimulation models build on a previous model-based solution to estimate the intra-cochlear electric field (EF) created by the CI. Herein, we propose to use the estimated EF to drive ANF models representing 75 nerve bundles along the length of the cochlea. We propose a method to detect the neural health of the ANF models by optimizing neural health parameters to minimize the sum of squared differences between simulated and the physiological measurements available via patients' CIs. The resulting health parameters provide an estimate of the health of ANF bundles. Experiments with 8 subjects show promising model prediction accuracy, with excellent agreement between neural stimulation responses that are clinically measured and those that are predicted by our parameter optimized models. These results suggest our modeling approach may provide an accurate estimation of ANF health for CI users.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory nerve fibers; Cochlear implant; Optimization

Year:  2020        PMID: 33884380      PMCID: PMC8054972          DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-59520-3_19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Simul Synth Med Imaging


  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of a model of the cochlear neural membrane. II: comparison of model and physiological measures of membrane properties measured in response to intrameatal electrical stimulation.

Authors:  L A Cartee
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Constructing a three-dimensional electrical model of a living cochlear implant user's cochlea.

Authors:  T K Malherbe; T Hanekom; J J Hanekom
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  Evaluation of a high-resolution patient-specific model of the electrically stimulated cochlea.

Authors:  Ahmet Cakir; Robert T Dwyer; Jack H Noble
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-06-14

4.  Unraveling the electrically evoked compound action potential.

Authors:  Jeroen J Briaire; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Initial Results With Image-guided Cochlear Implant Programming in Children.

Authors:  Jack H Noble; Andrea J Hedley-Williams; Linsey Sunderhaus; Benoit M Dawant; Robert F Labadie; Stephen M Camarata; René H Gifford
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Clinical evaluation of an image-guided cochlear implant programming strategy.

Authors:  Jack H Noble; René H Gifford; Andrea J Hedley-Williams; Benoit M Dawant; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  A model of the electrically excited human cochlear neuron. I. Contribution of neural substructures to the generation and propagation of spikes.

Authors:  F Rattay; P Lutter; H Felix
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Analysis of the human auditory nerve.

Authors:  H Spoendlin; A Schrott
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 9.  Cochlear implants: current designs and future possibilities.

Authors:  Blake S Wilson; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

10.  Image-guidance enables new methods for customizing cochlear implant stimulation strategies.

Authors:  Jack H Noble; Robert F Labadie; René H Gifford; Benoit M Dawant
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.