Literature DB >> 15953524

Unraveling the electrically evoked compound action potential.

Jeroen J Briaire1, Johan H M Frijns.   

Abstract

With the advent of eCAP recording tools such as NRT and NRI for cochlear implants, neural monitoring has become widely used to ascertain the integrity of the neural/electrode interface as well as for assisting in the setting of program levels. The basic concepts of eCAP recordings are deduced from the acoustical equivalent of the electrocochleogram. There are, however, indications that under electrical stimulation some of these do not hold, like the unitary response concept (i.e., the principle that every fiber produces the same contribution to the eCAP). Computer modeling has proven to be a valuable tool for gaining insight into the functioning of electrical stimulation. In this study the extension of a three-dimensional human cochlea, incorporating back-measuring capabilities, is described. Using this new model, the contribution of single fiber action potentials (SFAPs) to the measured eCAP is investigated. The model predicts that contrary to common belief--the compound action potential as measured by the cochlear implant system does not necessarily reflect the propagated action potential along the auditory nerve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15953524     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2005.03.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  27 in total

1.  Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Olga Stakhovskaya; Divya Sridhar; Ben H Bonham; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-21

2.  Changes across time in spike rate and spike amplitude of auditory nerve fibers stimulated by electric pulse trains.

Authors:  Fawen Zhang; Charles A Miller; Barbara K Robinson; Paul J Abbas; Ning Hu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-06-12

3.  Neural origin of evoked potentials during thalamic deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Alexander R Kent; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Threshold levels of dual electrode stimulation in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jorien Snel-Bongers; Jeroen J Briaire; Erika H van der Veen; Randy K Kalkman; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-22

5.  Current focusing and steering: modeling, physiology, and psychophysics.

Authors:  Ben H Bonham; Leonid M Litvak
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-04-06       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Measurement of evoked potentials during thalamic deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Alexander R Kent; Brandon D Swan; David T Brocker; Dennis A Turner; Robert E Gross; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  The polarity sensitivity of the electrically stimulated human auditory nerve measured at the level of the brainstem.

Authors:  Jaime A Undurraga; Robert P Carlyon; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-12

8.  The impact of internodal segmentation in biophysical nerve fiber models.

Authors:  David M T Dekker; Jeroen J Briaire; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 1.621

9.  Analysis of deep brain stimulation electrode characteristics for neural recording.

Authors:  Alexander R Kent; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Assessing the Electrode-Neuron Interface with the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential, Electrode Position, and Behavioral Thresholds.

Authors:  Lindsay DeVries; Rachel Scheperle; Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.