Literature DB >> 23529109

Image-guidance enables new methods for customizing cochlear implant stimulation strategies.

Jack H Noble, Robert F Labadie, René H Gifford, Benoit M Dawant.   

Abstract

Over the last 20 years, cochlear implants (CIs) have become what is arguably the most successful neural prosthesis to date. Despite this success, a significant number of CI recipients experience marginal hearing restoration, and, even among the best performers, restoration to normal fidelity is rare. In this paper, we present image processing techniques that can be used to detect, for the first time, the positions of implanted CI electrodes and the nerves they stimulate for individual CI users. These techniques permit development of new, customized CI stimulation strategies. We present one such strategy and show that it leads to significant hearing improvement in an experiment conducted with 11 CI recipients. These results indicate that image-guidance can be used to improve hearing outcomes for many existing CI recipients without requiring additional surgical procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23529109      PMCID: PMC3769452          DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2013.2253333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng        ISSN: 1534-4320            Impact factor:   3.802


  24 in total

1.  Speech understanding in noise with a Med-El COMBI 40+ cochlear implant using reduced channel sets.

Authors:  Carolyn Garnham; Martin O'Driscoll; Richard Ramsden And; Shakeel Saeed
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 2.  How cochlear implants encode speech.

Authors:  Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Olga Stakhovskaya; Divya Sridhar; Ben H Bonham; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-21

4.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Across-site patterns of modulation detection: relation to speech recognition.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Teresa A Zwolan; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Spectral modulation detection and vowel and consonant identifications in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Aniket A Saoji; Leonid Litvak; Anthony J Spahr; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Automatic segmentation of intracochlear anatomy in conventional CT.

Authors:  Jack H Noble; Robert F Labadie; Omid Majdani; Benoit M Dawant
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Sensitivity of psychophysical measures to signal processor modifications in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jong Ho Won; Kaibao Nie; Elyse Jameyson; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children.

Authors:  J Bench; A Kowal; J Bamford
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1979-08

Review 10.  Cochlear implants: current designs and future possibilities.

Authors:  Blake S Wilson; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008
View more
  66 in total

1.  Automatic segmentation of intra-cochlear anatomy in post-implantation CT of unilateral cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Fitsum A Reda; Theodore R McRackan; Robert F Labadie; Benoit M Dawant; Jack H Noble
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Automatic localization of closely spaced cochlear implant electrode arrays in clinical CTs.

Authors:  Yiyuan Zhao; Benoit M Dawant; Robert F Labadie; Jack H Noble
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Patient-specific estimation of detailed cochlear shape from clinical CT images.

Authors:  H Martin Kjer; Jens Fagertun; Wilhelm Wimmer; Nicolas Gerber; Sergio Vera; Livia Barazzetti; Nerea Mangado; Mario Ceresa; Gemma Piella; Thomas Stark; Martin Stauber; Mauricio Reyes; Stefan Weber; Marco Caversaccio; Miguel Ángel González Ballester; Rasmus R Paulsen
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Spectral and temporal analysis of simulated dead regions in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Gary L Jones; Il Joon Moon; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-05

5.  Auditory performance of post-lingually deafened adult cochlear implant recipients using electrode deactivation based on postoperative cone beam CT images.

Authors:  Fabiana Danieli; Thomas Dermacy; Maria Stella Arantes do Amaral; Ana Cláudia Mirandola Barbosa Reis; Dan Gnansia; Miguel Angelo Hyppolito
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Mammalian Cochlear Hair Cell Imaging Using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT): A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Sung-Won Choi; Jieun Kang; Seokhwan Lee; Se-Joon Oh; Hongki Kim; Soo-Keun Kong
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.017

7.  HeadLocNet: Deep convolutional neural networks for accurate classification and multi-landmark localization of head CTs.

Authors:  Dongqing Zhang; Jianing Wang; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 8.545

8.  Evaluation of Rigid Cochlear Models for Measuring Cochlear Implant Electrode Position.

Authors:  Ahmet Cakir; Robert F Labadie; M Geraldine Zuniga; Benoit M Dawant; Jack H Noble
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Validation of a clinical assessment of spectral-ripple resolution for cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Elizabeth S Anderson; Jong Ho Won; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Forward masking patterns by low and high-rate stimulation in cochlear implant users: Differences in masking effectiveness and spread of neural excitation.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Lixue Dong; Susannah Dixon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.