Literature DB >> 15053692

Cross-modal dynamic capture: congruency effects in the perception of motion across sensory modalities.

Salvador Soto-Faraco1, Charles Spence, Alan Kingstone.   

Abstract

This study investigated multisensory interactions in the perception of auditory and visual motion. When auditory and visual apparent motion streams are presented concurrently in opposite directions, participants often fail to discriminate the direction of motion of the auditory stream, whereas perception of the visual stream is unaffected by the direction of auditory motion (Experiment 1). This asymmetry persists even when the perceived quality of apparent motion is equated for the 2 modalities (Experiment 2). Subsequently, it was found that this visual modulation of auditory motion is caused by an illusory reversal in the perceived direction of sounds (Experiment 3). This "dynamic capture" effect occurs over and above ventriloquism among static events (Experiments 4 and 5), and it generalizes to continuous motion displays (Experiment 6). These data are discussed in light of related multisensory phenomena and their support for a "modality appropriateness" interpretation of multisensory integration in motion perception. ((c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15053692     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.2.330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  36 in total

1.  When does visual perceptual grouping affect multisensory integration?

Authors:  Daniel Sanabria; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Jason S Chan; Charles Spence
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Congruency effects between auditory and tactile motion: extending the phenomenon of cross-modal dynamic capture.

Authors:  Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Assessing the effect of visual and tactile distractors on the perception of auditory apparent motion.

Authors:  Daniel Sanabria; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Influence of visual motion on tactile motion perception.

Authors:  S J Bensmaïa; J H Killebrew; J C Craig
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Effects of visual stimuli on temporal order judgments of unimanual finger stimuli.

Authors:  Satoshi Shibuya; Toshimitsu Takahashi; Shigeru Kitazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Multi-sensory integration of spatio-temporal segmentation cues: one plus one does not always equal two.

Authors:  Feng Zhou; Victoria Wong; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Auditory motion affects visual motion perception in a speeded discrimination task.

Authors:  Daniel Sanabria; Juan Lupiáñez; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The modulation of crossmodal integration by unimodal perceptual grouping: a visuotactile apparent motion study.

Authors:  Georgina Lyons; Daniel Sanabria; Argiro Vatakis; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Sound-contingent visual motion aftereffect.

Authors:  Souta Hidaka; Wataru Teramoto; Maori Kobayashi; Yoichi Sugita
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Neural correlates of audiovisual motion capture.

Authors:  Jeroen J Stekelenburg; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.