Literature DB >> 27488630

A Neural Model of MST and MT Explains Perceived Object Motion during Self-Motion.

Oliver W Layton1, Brett R Fajen2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: When a moving object cuts in front of a moving observer at a 90° angle, the observer correctly perceives that the object is traveling along a perpendicular path just as if viewing the moving object from a stationary vantage point. Although the observer's own (self-)motion affects the object's pattern of motion on the retina, the visual system is able to factor out the influence of self-motion and recover the world-relative motion of the object (Matsumiya and Ando, 2009). This is achieved by using information in global optic flow (Rushton and Warren, 2005; Warren and Rushton, 2009; Fajen and Matthis, 2013) and other sensory arrays (Dupin and Wexler, 2013; Fajen et al., 2013; Dokka et al., 2015) to estimate and deduct the component of the object's local retinal motion that is due to self-motion. However, this account (known as "flow parsing") is qualitative and does not shed light on mechanisms in the visual system that recover object motion during self-motion. We present a simple computational account that makes explicit possible mechanisms in visual cortex by which self-motion signals in the medial superior temporal area interact with object motion signals in the middle temporal area to transform object motion into a world-relative reference frame. The model (1) relies on two mechanisms (MST-MT feedback and disinhibition of opponent motion signals in MT) to explain existing data, (2) clarifies how pathways for self-motion and object-motion perception interact, and (3) unifies the existing flow parsing hypothesis with established neurophysiological mechanisms. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: To intercept targets, we must perceive the motion of objects that move independently from us as we move through the environment. Although our self-motion substantially alters the motion of objects on the retina, compelling evidence indicates that the visual system at least partially compensates for self-motion such that object motion relative to the stationary environment can be more accurately perceived. We have developed a model that sheds light on plausible mechanisms within the visual system that transform retinal motion into a world-relative reference frame. Our model reveals how local motion signals (generated through interactions within the middle temporal area) and global motion signals (feedback from the dorsal medial superior temporal area) contribute and offers a new hypothesis about the connection between pathways for heading and object motion perception.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/368093-10$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MSTd; MT; feedback; heading; object motion; self-motion

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27488630      PMCID: PMC6601960          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4593-15.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  37 in total

1.  Motion opponency in visual cortex.

Authors:  D J Heeger; G M Boynton; J B Demb; E Seidemann; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Specificity of projections from wide-field and local motion-processing regions within the middle temporal visual area of the owl monkey.

Authors:  V K Berezovskii; R T Born
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Temporal dynamics of a neural solution to the aperture problem in visual area MT of macaque brain.

Authors:  C C Pack; R T Born
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-02-22       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  A computational and perceptual account of motion lines.

Authors:  H Kim; G Francis
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Posterior parietal cortex neurons encode target motion in world-centered coordinates.

Authors:  Uwe J Ilg; Stefan Schumann; Peter Thier
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-07-08       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 6.  Structure and function of visual area MT.

Authors:  Richard T Born; David C Bradley
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  Segregation of global and local motion processing in primate middle temporal visual area.

Authors:  R T Born; R B Tootell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-06-11       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Moving observers, relative retinal motion and the detection of object movement.

Authors:  Simon K Rushton; Paul A Warren
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-07-26       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Perception of object trajectory: parsing retinal motion into self and object movement components.

Authors:  Paul A Warren; Simon K Rushton
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Center-surround interactions in the middle temporal visual area of the owl monkey.

Authors:  R T Born
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  18 in total

1.  Going with the Flow: The Neural Mechanisms Underlying Illusions of Complex-Flow Motion.

Authors:  Junxiang Luo; Keyan He; Ian Max Andolina; Xiaohong Li; Jiapeng Yin; Zheyuan Chen; Yong Gu; Wei Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Causal inference accounts for heading perception in the presence of object motion.

Authors:  Kalpana Dokka; Hyeshin Park; Michael Jansen; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Computational Mechanisms for Perceptual Stability using Disparity and Motion Parallax.

Authors:  Oliver W Layton; Brett R Fajen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Retinal optic flow during natural locomotion.

Authors:  Jonathan Samir Matthis; Karl S Muller; Kathryn L Bonnen; Mary M Hayhoe
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  A neural mechanism for detecting object motion during self-motion.

Authors:  HyungGoo R Kim; Dora E Angelaki; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 8.713

6.  Hierarchical structure is employed by humans during visual motion perception.

Authors:  Johannes Bill; Hrag Pailian; Samuel J Gershman; Jan Drugowitsch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Auditory cues facilitate object movement processing in human extrastriate visual cortex during simulated self-motion: A pilot study.

Authors:  Lucia M Vaina; Finnegan J Calabro; Abhisek Samal; Kunjan D Rana; Fahimeh Mamashli; Sheraz Khan; Matti Hämäläinen; Seppo P Ahlfors; Jyrki Ahveninen
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-18       Impact factor: 3.610

8.  Peripheral Visual Cues Contribute to the Perception of Object Movement During Self-Movement.

Authors:  Cassandra Rogers; Simon K Rushton; Paul A Warren
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-11-21

9.  The Primary Role of Flow Processing in the Identification of Scene-Relative Object Movement.

Authors:  Simon K Rushton; Diederick C Niehorster; Paul A Warren; Li Li
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Accuracy and Tuning of Flow Parsing for Visual Perception of Object Motion During Self-Motion.

Authors:  Diederick C Niehorster; Li Li
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-05-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.