Literature DB >> 3387903

Identical 24-hour gastric pH profiles when using intragastric antimony or glass electrodes or aspirated gastric juice.

J Andersen1, J Naesdal, M Ström.   

Abstract

Intragastric pH was continuously measured over 24 h with a monocrystalline antimony electrode system and was compared with pH measured in simultaneously aspirated gastric juice and with pH measured by using a conventional intragastric glass electrode. There was a marked correlation between the pH readings obtained with the monocrystalline antimony electrode and the pH values measured in aspirated gastric juice (r = 0.92, p less than 0.001) and with the pH readings obtained with the intragastric glass electrode (r = 0.92, p less than 0.001). Both readings of pH with glass electrode and of pH after aspiration can be predicted by readings of pH with antimony electrode by using linear regression lines with slopes close to 1. Intragastric pH measurement is an alternative to aspiration of gastric juice, and the result obtained with an electrode of monocrystalline antimony is comparable to that obtained with a conventional glass electrode.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3387903     DOI: 10.3109/00365528809093882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  8 in total

1.  Antimony and glass pH electrodes can be used interchangeably in 24-hour studies of gastric acidity.

Authors:  G S Mela; V Savarino; M Moretti; A Sumberaz; G Bonifacino; P Zentilin; E Caputo; G Villa; G Celle
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  The ion sensitive field effect transistor (ISFET) pH electrode: a new sensor for long term ambulatory pH monitoring.

Authors:  P Duroux; C Emde; P Bauerfeind; C Francis; A Grisel; L Thybaud; D Arstrong; C Depeursinge; A L Blum
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Assessment of gastric acidity in intensive care patients: intermittent pH registration cannot replace continuous pH monitoring.

Authors:  M J Bonten; C A Gaillard; R W Stockbrügger; F H van Tiel; S van der Geest; E E Stobberingh
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Antimony electrodes. Mucosal potential differences and buffer composition adversely affect pH measurements in the stomach.

Authors:  A R Opekun; J L Smith; D Y Graham
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Use of automatic computerised pump to maintain constant intragastric pH.

Authors:  A Hannan; I Chesner; H S Merki; S Mann; R P Walt
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Low bedtime doses of H2-receptor antagonists for acute treatment of duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  V Savarino; G S Mela; P Zentilin; G Bonifacino; M Moretti; F Valle; G Celle
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Comparison of low-dose antacids, cimetidine, and placebo on 24-hour intragastric acidity in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  R Weberg; A Berstad; M Osnes
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Gastric emptying of two radiolabelled antacids with simultaneous monitoring of gastric pH.

Authors:  J Monés; I Carrio; S Sainz; L Berná; P Clavé; M Liszkay; M Roca; F Vilardell
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.