Literature DB >> 2253907

Use of automatic computerised pump to maintain constant intragastric pH.

A Hannan1, I Chesner, H S Merki, S Mann, R P Walt.   

Abstract

We used continuous variable rate infusions of famotidine in eight normal volunteers under fasting conditions to raise intragastric pH to 5.0. An intragastric glass electrode continuously monitored acidity and this information was automatically computed to regulate an intravenous infusion system (GastroJet). The computer was programmed to aim for pH 6.0, increasing and lowering infusion rates accordingly. Two regimens were compared with placebo (10 mg bolus followed by infusion or infusion of famotidine alone). Volunteers were admitted to an investigation ward and each study was preceded by a standard normal meal. Hydration was maintained with intravenous fluids. During placebo treatment the median pH was 1.5 and the pH was less than 5.0 for 98% of the time. All volunteers responded to famotidine but dosage requirements varied (range 41 mg to 126 mg). The median pH rose to 6.5 when infusions of famotidine followed boluses and to 6.6 when infusions alone were used - the pH was less than 5.0 for 20% and 16% of the time respectively (p less than 0.05 Wilcoxon compared with placebo). Mean drug use was greater with boluses (98 mg v 87 mg p = 0.03: paired Student's t test) and onset was not apparently faster. Blood famotidine concentrations followed infusion rate changes. Famotidine infused by GastroJet maintains a high fasting intragastric pH and priming boluses are probably unnecessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2253907      PMCID: PMC1378693          DOI: 10.1136/gut.31.11.1246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  12 in total

1.  Effect of acid and pepsin on blood coagulation and platelet aggregation. A possible contributor prolonged gastroduodenal mucosal hemorrhage.

Authors:  F W Green; M M Kaplan; L E Curtis; P H Levine
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Day-to-day variation of 24-hour intragastric acidity.

Authors:  H S Merki; L Witzel; R P Walt; E Cohnen; K Harre; J Heim; A Mappes; J Röhmel
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  24-hour study of intragastric acidity in duodenal ulcer patients and normal subjects using continuous intraluminal pH-metry.

Authors:  V Savarino; G S Mela; P Scalabrini; A Sumberaz; G Fera; G Celle
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Continuous intravenous infusions of famotidine maintain high intragastric pH in duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  H S Merki; L Witzel; D Kaufman; M Kempf; J Neumann; J Röhmel; R P Walt
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Analytical method for the quantification of famotidine, an H2-receptor blocker, in plasma and urine.

Authors:  W C Vincek; M L Constanzer; G A Hessey; W F Bayne
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1985-03-22

6.  Stomach as source of bacteria colonising respiratory tract during artificial ventilation.

Authors:  S T Atherton; D J White
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-11-04       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Long-term ambulatory gastric pH monitoring: validation of a new method and effect of H2-antagonists.

Authors:  C J Fimmel; A Etienne; T Cilluffo; C von Ritter; T Gasser; J P Rey; P Caradonna-Moscatelli; F Sabbatini; F Pace; H W Bühler
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Down with multiple t-tests.

Authors:  J D Elashoff
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Alteration of normal gastric flora in critical care patients receiving antacid and cimetidine therapy.

Authors:  L G Donowitz; M C Page; B L Mileur; S H Guenthner
Journal:  Infect Control       Date:  1986-01

10.  Nosocomial pneumonia in intubated patients given sucralfate as compared with antacids or histamine type 2 blockers. The role of gastric colonization.

Authors:  M R Driks; D E Craven; B R Celli; M Manning; R A Burke; G M Garvin; L M Kunches; H W Farber; S A Wedel; W R McCabe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-11-26       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  5 in total

1.  Food but not a chemically defined diet interferes with maintenance of intragastric pH at a predefined level using continuous pH-stat-adjusted intravenous infusion of ranitidine in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  A B Thomson; P Kirdeikis; R Lastiwka; L Zuk; M Jen; M Elias; P Johnston
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  pH-feedback controlled infusions of ranitidine are no more effective than fixed-dose infusions in reducing gastric acidity and variability in antisecretory responses.

Authors:  C H Wilder-Smith; F Halter; W Häcki; H S Merki
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Optimizing acid suppression for treatment of acid-related diseases.

Authors:  R H Hunt; C Cederberg; J Dent; F Halter; C Howden; I N Marks; S Rune; R P Walt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Individual and group dose-responses to intravenous omeprazole in the first 24 h: pH-feedback-controlled and fixed-dose infusions.

Authors:  C H Wilder-Smith; H U Bettschen; H S Merki
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Maintenance of intragastric pH > 4 with famotidine in duodenal ulcer patients: factors influencing drug requirements.

Authors:  J C Delchier; F Roudot-Thoraval; L Stanescu; M C Deharvengt; L Elouaer Blanc
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 23.059

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.