Literature DB >> 27260559

Noninvasive Failure Load Prediction of Vertebrae with Simulated Lytic Defects and Biomaterial Augmentation.

Hugo Giambini1, Zhong Fang1,2, Heng Zeng1,2, Jon J Camp3, Michael J Yaszemski1,4, Lichun Lu1,4.   

Abstract

The spine is the most common site for secondary bone metastases, and clinical management for fractures is based on size and geometry of the defect. About 75% of the bone needs to be damaged before lesions are detectable, so clinical tools should measure changes in both geometry and material properties. We have developed an automated, user-friendly, Spine Cancer Assessment (SCA) image-based analysis method that builds on a platform designed for clinical practice providing failure characteristics of vertebrae. The objectives of this study were to (1) validate SCA predictions with experimental failure load outcomes; (2) evaluate the planning capabilities for prophylactic vertebroplasty procedures; and (3) investigate the effect of computed tomography (CT) protocols on predicted failure loads. Twenty-one vertebrae were randomly divided into two groups: (1) simulated defect without treatment (negative control) [n = 9] and (2) with treatment [n = 12]. Defects were created and a polymeric biomaterial was injected into the vertebrae in the treated-defect group. Spines were scanned, reconstructed with two algorithms, and analyzed for fracture loads. To virtually plan for prophylactic intervention, vertebrae with empty lesions were simulated to be augmented with either poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) or a novel bone replacement copolymer, poly(propylene fumarate-co-caprolactone) [P(PF-co-CL)]. Axial rigidities were calculated from the CT images. Failure loads, determined from the cross section with the lowest axial rigidity, were compared with experimental values. Predicted loads correlated well with experimental outcomes (R(2) = 0.73, p < 0.0001). Predictions from negative control specimens highly correlated with measured values (R(2) = 0.90, p < 0.0001). Although a similar correlation was obtained using both algorithms, the smooth reconstruction (B30) tended to underestimate predicted failure loads by ∼50% compared with the ∼10% underestimate of the sharp reconstruction (B70). Percent increase in failure loads after virtual vertebroplasty showed a higher increase in samples with PMMA compared with those with copolymer. The SCA method developed in this study calculated failure loads from quantitative computed tomography scans in vertebrae with simulated metastatic lytic defects, with or without treatment, facilitating clinical applicability and providing more reliable guidelines for physicians to select appropriate treatment options. Furthermore, the analysis could accommodate augmentation planning procedures that aimed to determine the optimum material that would increase vertebral body failure load.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27260559      PMCID: PMC4991609          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2016.0078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods        ISSN: 1937-3384            Impact factor:   3.056


  25 in total

1.  Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  R Paul Crawford; Christopher E Cann; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Estimation of mechanical properties of cortical bone by computed tomography.

Authors:  S M Snyder; E Schneider
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  The Effect of Quantitative Computed Tomography Acquisition Protocols on Bone Mineral Density Estimation.

Authors:  Hugo Giambini; Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Paul M Huddleston; Jon J Camp; Kai-Nan An; Ahmad Nassr
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Predicting failure of thoracic vertebrae with simulated and actual metastatic defects.

Authors:  H J Windhagen; J A Hipp; M J Silva; S J Lipson; W C Hayes
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Risk factors and probability of vertebral body collapse in metastases of the thoracic and lumbar spine.

Authors:  H Taneichi; K Kaneda; N Takeda; K Abumi; S Satoh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Cross-linking characteristics and mechanical properties of an injectable biomaterial composed of polypropylene fumarate and polycaprolactone co-polymer.

Authors:  Jun Yan; Jianmin Li; M Brett Runge; Mahrokh Dadsetan; Qingshan Chen; Lichun Lu; Michael J Yaszemski
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 3.517

7.  Biomechanical evaluation of an injectable and biodegradable copolymer P(PF-co-CL) in a cadaveric vertebral body defect model.

Authors:  Zhong Fang; Hugo Giambini; Heng Zeng; Jon J Camp; Mahrokh Dadsetan; Richard A Robb; Kai-Nan An; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  Quantitative computed tomography-based finite element analysis predictions of femoral strength and stiffness depend on computed tomography settings.

Authors:  Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Christina Salas; Susheil Uthamaraj; Timothy Rossman
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Metastatic disease in long bones: A proposed scoring system for diagnosing impending pathologic fractures. 1989.

Authors:  Hilton Mirels
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Specimen-specific nonlinear finite element modeling to predict vertebrae fracture loads after vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Y Matsuura; H Giambini; Y Ogawa; Z Fang; A R Thoreson; M J Yaszemski; L Lu; K N An
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  5 in total

1.  Single-level subject-specific finite element model can predict fracture outcomes in three-level spine segments under different loading rates.

Authors:  Asghar Rezaei; Maryam Tilton; Yong Li; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 6.698

2.  The trabecular effect: A population-based longitudinal study on age and sex differences in bone mineral density and vertebral load bearing capacity.

Authors:  Marianna L Oppenheimer-Velez; Hugo Giambini; Asghar Rezaei; Jon J Camp; Sundeep Khosla; Lichun Lu
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Female Human Spines with Simulated Osteolytic Defects: CT-based Structural Analysis of Vertebral Body Strength.

Authors:  Ron Alkalay; Robert Adamson; Alexander Miropolsky; David Hackney
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Mechanical testing setups affect spine segment fracture outcomes.

Authors:  Asghar Rezaei; Hugo Giambini; Kent D Carlson; Hao Xu; Susheil Uthamaraj; Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2019-08-17

5.  CT-based structural analyses of vertebral fractures with polymeric augmentation: A study of cadaveric three-level spine segments.

Authors:  Asghar Rezaei; Hugo Giambini; Alan L Miller Ii; Hao Xu; Haocheng Xu; Yong Li; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 6.698

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.