Literature DB >> 11005515

Noninvasive imaging predicts failure load of the spine with simulated osteolytic defects.

K M Whealan1, S D Kwak, J R Tedrow, K Inoue, B D Snyder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical management of lytic tumors of the spine is currently based on geometric measurements of the defect. However, the mechanical behavior of a structure depends on both its material and its geometric properties. Quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry were investigated as noninvasive tools for measuring the material and geometric properties of vertebrae with a simulated lytic defect. From these measures, yield loads were predicted with use of composite beam theory.
METHODS: Thirty-four fresh-frozen cadaveric spines were segmented into functional spinal units of three vertebral bodies with two intervertebral discs at the thoracic and lumbar levels. Lytic defects of equal size were created in one of three locations: the anterior, lateral, or posterior region of the vertebra. Each spinal unit was scanned with use of computed tomography and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and axial and bending rigidities were calculated from the image data. Each specimen was brought to failure under combined compression and forward flexion, and the axial load and bending moment at yield were recorded.
RESULTS: Although the relative defect size was nearly constant, measured yield loads had a large dispersion, suggesting that defect size alone was a poor predictor of failure. However, image-derived measures of structural rigidity correlated moderately well with measured yield loads. Furthermore, with use of composite beam theory with quantitative computed tomography-derived rigidities, vertebral yield loads were predicted on a one-to-one basis (concordance, r(c) = 0.74).
CONCLUSIONS: Although current clinical guidelines for predicting fracture risk are based on geometric measurements of the defect, we have shown that the relative size of the defect alone does not account for the variation in vertebral yield loads. However, composite beam theory analysis with quantitative computed tomography-derived measures of rigidity can be used to prospectively predict the yield loads of vertebrae with lytic defects. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Image-predicted vertebral yield loads and analytical models that approximate loads applied to the spine during activities of daily living can be used to calculate a factor of fracture risk that can be employed by physicians to plan appropriate treatment or intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11005515     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200009000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  34 in total

1.  Non-invasive assessment of failure torque in rat bones with simulated lytic lesions using computed tomography based structural rigidity analysis.

Authors:  Vahid Entezari; Pamela A Basto; Vartan Vartanians; David Zurakowski; Brian D Snyder; Ara Nazarian
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 2.  Computed tomography-based rigidity analysis: a review of the approach in preclinical and clinical studies.

Authors:  Juan C Villa-Camacho; Otatade Iyoha-Bello; Shohreh Behrouzi; Brian D Snyder; Ara Nazarian
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2014-11-05

3.  Treatment Planning and Fracture Prediction in Patients with Skeletal Metastasis with CT-Based Rigidity Analysis.

Authors:  Ara Nazarian; Vahid Entezari; David Zurakowski; Nathan Calderon; John A Hipp; Juan C Villa-Camacho; Patrick P Lin; Felix H Cheung; Albert J Aboulafia; Robert Turcotte; Megan E Anderson; Mark C Gebhardt; Edward Y Cheng; Richard M Terek; Michael Yaszemski; Timothy A Damron; Brian D Snyder
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Predicting distal femur bone strength in a murine model of tumor osteolysis.

Authors:  Kenneth A Mann; John Lee; Sarah A Arrington; Timothy A Damron; Matthew J Allen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Application of structural rigidity analysis to assess fidelity of healed fractures in rat femurs with critical defects.

Authors:  Ara Nazarian; Lina Pezzella; Alan Tseng; Stephen Baldassarri; David Zurakowski; Christopher H Evans; Brian D Snyder
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Comparison of quantitative computed tomography-based measures in predicting vertebral compressive strength.

Authors:  Jenni M Buckley; Kenneth Loo; Julie Motherway
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Hutchinson-Gilford progeria is a skeletal dysplasia.

Authors:  Catherine M Gordon; Leslie B Gordon; Brian D Snyder; Ara Nazarian; Nicolle Quinn; Susanna Huh; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Donna Neuberg; Robert Cleveland; Monica Kleinman; David T Miller; Mark W Kieran
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Compressive axial mechanical properties of rat bone as functions of bone volume fraction, apparent density and micro-ct based mineral density.

Authors:  Esther Cory; Ara Nazarian; Vahid Entezari; Vartan Vartanians; Ralph Müller; Brian D Snyder
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  A pediatric animal model to evaluate the effects of disuse on musculoskeletal growth and development.

Authors:  Daniel L Miranda; Melissa Putman; Ruby Kandah; Maria Cubria; Sebastian Suarez; Ara Nazarian; Brian Snyder
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Vertebroplasty for pain relief and spinal stabilization in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Flavio Tancioni; Martin Lorenzetti; Pierina Navarria; Andrea Nozza; Luca Castagna; Paolo Gaetani; Enrico Aimar; Daniel Levi; Antonio Di Ieva; Patrizia Pisano; Armando Santoro; Marta Scorsetti; Riccardo Rodriguez y Baena
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.