Literature DB >> 33851360

Satisfaction and genital perception after orchiectomy for prostate cancer: does the technique matter? A randomized trial.

Onkar Singh1,2, Partho Mukherjee3, M S Sakthivel3, Cornerstone Wann3, A J P George3, Rajesh Gopalakrishnan4, Belavendra Antonisamy5, Antony Devasia3, Santosh Kumar3, Nitin S Kekre3, J Chandrasingh3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Bilateral extracapsular or total orchiectomy (BEO) for prostate cancer is presumed to have psychological consequences after the surgery due to perception of an empty scrotum. Bilateral subcapsular orchiectomy (BSO) was designed to preserve perception of palpable testes. We compared the patients' satisfaction and genital perception following BEO and BSO.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prostate cancer patients eligible for androgen deprivation therapy who opted for orchiectomy were enrolled in prospective randomized study. Patients with bleeding disorder or uncorrected coagulopathy, poor performance score, and psychiatric problems were excluded. Outlook to life and own health in-general, overall satisfaction to the procedure and genital perception was evaluated using modified Fugl-Meyer questionnaire (FMQ) which was administered before and after 3 months of the surgery. Patients were randomized to BEO and BSO groups at the time of surgery using block randomization. Primary outcome was to compare the genital perception of testicular loss and patients' satisfaction to BSO and BEO. Secondary outcomes included testosterone and PSA control, operative time, and complications.
RESULTS: Total 35 patients were enrolled in each group which was comparable. There was no difference in PSA control at 3 months. Mean operative time and blood loss were significantly lesser in BEO group. FMQ score at 3 months did not show significant difference. Majority of the patients in both groups were satisfied with procedure and the aesthetic value of scrotum after surgery. However, 84% in BSO group did not feel that testes were removed on self-examination, as compared to 28% in BEO group. Majority patients in both groups did not report physical or psychological discomfort from change in scrotal content.
CONCLUSIONS: Results showed that patients' satisfaction and genital perception following BSO and BEO were similar. Feeling of remaining intrascrotal contents after BSO did not had added psychological advantage in terms of perception of genitalia.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Androgen deprivation therapy; Genital perception; Orchiectomy; Prostate cancer; Quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33851360     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-021-02849-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  19 in total

1.  On life satisfaction in male erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  A R Fugl-Meyer; G Lodnert; I B Bränholm; K S Fugl-Meyer
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.896

2.  Medical or surgical orchidectomy: the patients' choice.

Authors:  D J Chadwick; D A Gillatt; J C Gingell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-03-09

3.  Decreasing use of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists in the United States is Independent of Reimbursement Changes: A Medicare and Veterans Health Administration claims analysis.

Authors:  Steven L Chang; Joseph C Liao; Rajesh Shinghal
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-05-17       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Comparison of testosterone and LH values in subcapsular vs total orchiectomy patients.

Authors:  J P Chapman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Hormonal effect of subcapsular orchiectomy versus total orchiectomy.

Authors:  J R Tacker; J E Coker; T A Hosty; D D Albers
Journal:  Invest Urol       Date:  1980-05

6.  Prospective randomised controlled trial comparing sub-epididymal orchiectomy versus conventional orchiectomy in metastatic carcinoma of prostate.

Authors:  Shivadeo Bapat; Pratikshit M Mahajan; Ashish A Bhave; Yogesh B Kshirsagar; Yogesh B Sovani; Abhirudra Mulay
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 0.656

7.  Decline in bilateral orchiectomy for prostate cancer in Olmsted county, Minnesota, 1956-2000.

Authors:  L J Melton; K I Alothman; S J Achenbach; W M O'Fallon; H Zincke
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.616

8.  Cost comparison of orchiectomy and leuprolide in metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  R A Bonzani; H J Stricker; J O Peabody; M Menon
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Comparison of subcapsular and total orchiectomy for treatment of metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  X Z Zhang; M P Donovan; B T Williams; J L Mohler
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Subcapsular orchiectomy in the primary therapy of patients with bone metastasis in advanced prostate cancer: an anachronistic intervention?

Authors:  Oleg Rud; Julia Peter; Reza Kheyri; Christian Gilfrich; Ali M Ahmed; Wieland Boeckmann; Paul G Fabricius; Matthias May
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2011-09-14
View more
  1 in total

1.  Cosmetic Appeal, HRQoL, and Effectiveness of Simple and Pseudotesticular Techniques of Orchidectomy in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Ijeoma N C Chibuzo; Augustine O Takure; Olayiwola B Shittu; Linus I Okeke
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2021-11-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.