Literature DB >> 8633409

Comparison of subcapsular and total orchiectomy for treatment of metastatic prostate cancer.

X Z Zhang1, M P Donovan, B T Williams, J L Mohler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether subcapsular orchiectomy provides suboptimal treatment of metastatic prostate cancer when used to avoid the psychologic consequences of the empty scrotum that results from total orchiectomy.
METHODS: We compared testosterone and prostate-specific antigen levels and survival of 37 patients who underwent total orchiectomy and 37 patients who underwent subcapsular orchiectomy for metastatic prostate cancer.
RESULTS: The two groups of 37 patients were similar by clinical parameters. Postoperatively, testosterone levels were 21 +/- 11 ng/dL for subcapsular versus 21 +/- 9 ng/dL for total orchiectomy patients. Tumor response was similar in the two groups when assessed by prostate-specific antigen measured 3 weeks, 6 months, and 1, 2, and 3 years postoperatively. Survival was similar when assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis (P = 0.76).
CONCLUSIONS: Subcapsular orchiectomy is a viable option for treatment of metastatic prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8633409     DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80460-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  6 in total

1.  Goserelin versus leuprolide in the chemical castration of patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Élcio Dias Silva; Ubirajara Ferreira; Wagner Matheus; Eliney F Faria; Gustavo D Silva; Minori Saito; Auro A S de Souza; Azuil Laranjo; Otavio Clark; Luis Alberto Magna; Lísias Nogueira Castilho; Leonardo Oliveira Reis
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Agonists are Superior to Subcapsular Orchiectomy in Lowering Testosterone Levels of Men with Prostate Cancer: Results from a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Peter B Østergren; Caroline Kistorp; Mikkel Fode; James Henderson; Finn N Bennedbæk; Jens Faber; Jens Sønksen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Satisfaction and genital perception after orchiectomy for prostate cancer: does the technique matter? A randomized trial.

Authors:  Onkar Singh; Partho Mukherjee; M S Sakthivel; Cornerstone Wann; A J P George; Rajesh Gopalakrishnan; Belavendra Antonisamy; Antony Devasia; Santosh Kumar; Nitin S Kekre; J Chandrasingh
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Subcapsular orchiectomy in the primary therapy of patients with bone metastasis in advanced prostate cancer: an anachronistic intervention?

Authors:  Oleg Rud; Julia Peter; Reza Kheyri; Christian Gilfrich; Ali M Ahmed; Wieland Boeckmann; Paul G Fabricius; Matthias May
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2011-09-14

5.  LCN6, a novel human epididymal lipocalin.

Authors:  Katherine G Hamil; Qiang Liu; P Sivashanmugam; M Anbalagan; Suresh Yenugu; Rama Soundararajan; Gail Grossman; A J Rao; Charles E Birse; Stephen M Ruben; Richard T Richardson; Yong-Lian Zhang; Michael G O'Rand; Peter Petrusz; Frank S French; Susan H Hall
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 5.211

6.  Evaluation of the subcapsular technique for primary closure castration in donkeys (Equus asinus).

Authors:  Ahmed Ibrahim; Usama T Mahmoud; Magda M Ali; Sohair M M Ragab
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.