| Literature DB >> 34868687 |
Ijeoma N C Chibuzo1, Augustine O Takure1,2, Olayiwola B Shittu1,2, Linus I Okeke1,2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Orchidectomy is the most cost-effective means of hormonal therapy for locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer (LAMP). However, cost-effectiveness should not detract from health-related quality of life (HRQoL) considerations. Bilateral simple orchidectomy (BSO) has been linked to negative psychometric deficits from an empty scrotum. This study compared the HRQoL, therapeutic efficacy, and cosmetic appeal of BSO with endogenous pseudotesticular techniques of bilateral subcapsular orchidectomy (BSCO) and bilateral-epididymal-sparing orchidectomy (BESO). Research Design. Nigerian patients with LAMP were randomised into three surgical arms: BSO, BSCO, and BESO. Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 HRQoL and sociodemographic questionnaires were administered before and three months after orchidectomy. Serum testosterone and PSA were measured at 0, 1, 2, and 3 hours; 7 days; and 3 months postoperatively. Pseudotesticular volumes and cosmetic appeal were assessed at 3 months. RESULT: Sixty-three patients were recruited (24 BSO, 21 BSCO, 18 BESO), 73% of whom were low-income earners. There was no significant difference in the procedure cost nor the PSA or testosterone nadirs achieved over the three-month follow-up period (11.3, 12.6, 15.2 ng/ml (p=0.667) and 0.44, 0.64, 0.79 nmol/l (p=0.603) respectively). Those with pseudotesticles (BSCO, BESO) felt less emasculated (p=0.010). BSCO produced the least sexual bother, highest sexual function, and largest pseudotesticular volumes. The cosmetic appeal scores were similar between groups (77.9 ± 22.8, 81 ± 13.9, and 81.9 ± 22.5, respectively, p=0.858).Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34868687 PMCID: PMC8642020 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9968570
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prostate Cancer ISSN: 2090-312X
Costs of various hormonal therapies for prostate cancer, in and around UCH Ibadan (informal market survey in 2015∗∗ and 2018 ^).
| Treatment | Cost per patient (₦) | SOP cost (₦) | Recurrent costs per year | Total cost per year (₦) | Total cost by 30-month minimum treatment period (₦) | Cost of serum testosterone assay (₦) | Cost of serum PSA assay (₦) | Total cost per year (₦) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orchidectomy in the main theatre under LA∗∗ | 39,500 | 12,500 | No | 39, 500 or 12, 500 | 39, 500 or 12, 500 | 4000 (+4000 post-op) | 3,000 (x2 = 6000 per year) | 66,000 or 26, 500 first year; 6000 in subsequent years |
| Orchidectomy in the main theatre under LA^ | 83,500 | 22,500 | No | 83, 500 or 22, 500 | 83, 500 or 22, 500 | 4500 (+4500 post-op) | 3,500 (x2 = 7,000 per year) | 99,500 or 38,500 first year; 7,000 in subsequent years |
| SC goserelin (monthly dose)∗∗ | 18,000 | — | Yes | 216, 000 | 540, 000 | 4000 (x3-4 = 12,000–16,000 per year) | 3,000 (x2 = 6,000 per year) | 238,000 |
| SC goserelin (monthly dose)^ | 56,000 | — | Yes | 672, 000 | 1,680,000 | 4500 (x3-4 = 13,500–18,000 per year) | 3,500 (x2 = 7,000 per year) | 692,500–697,500 |
| SC goserelin (3 monthly doses)∗∗ | 54,000 | — | Yes | 216,000 | 540,000 | 4000 (x3-4 = 12–16,000 per year) | 3,000 (x2 = 6000 per year) | 238,000 |
| SC goserelin (3 monthly doses)^ | 85,000–110,000 | — | Yes | 340,000–440,000 | 2,550,000–3,300,000 | 4500 (x3-4 = 13,500–18,000 per year) | 3,500 (x2 = 7,000 per year) | 360,500–465,000 |
| Bicalutamide (monthly dose)∗∗ | 24,000 | — | Yes | 288,000 | 720,000 | 4000 (x3-4 = 12,000–16,000 per year) | 3,000 (x2 = 6000 per year) | 319,000 |
| Bicalutamide (monthly dose)^ | 28,000 | — | Yes | 336,000 | 840,000 | 4500 (x3-4 = 13,500–18,000 per year) | 3,500 (x2 = 7,000 per year) | 356,500–361,000 |
₦360: 1 USD. Some of the patients may benefit from the use of the surgical outpatient (SOP) theatre, at cheaper rates. LA : local anaesthetic; SC : subcutaneous.
Figure 1Simple orchidectomy. (a) Testicular vessels clamped. (b) Proximal testicular vascular stump ligated (arrow) and vas deferens clamped.
Figure 2Subcapsular orchidectomy. (a) Vascular clamp applied. (b) Incised tunica albuginea. (c) Testicular parenchyma scraped off tunica albuginea. (d) Reapposed tunica albuginea to form a capsular pseudotesticle.
Figure 3Epididymal-sparing orchidectomy. (a) Developed epididymal sinus. (b) Excised testis. (c) Isolated epididymis to be used as pseudotesticle. (d) Cauda of epididymis looped to meet the caput.(e) Epididymal pseudotesticle. (f) Isolated vas deferens. (g) Division of vas.
Figure 4Schema of patient recruitment.
Sociodemographic characteristics of subject participants.
| BSO | BSCO | BESO |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, mean (SD) | 69.7 (8.4) | 70.9 (12.0) | 70.2 (8.7) | 0.880 |
|
| ||||
| Relationship status, N (%) | 0.761 | |||
| Living with spouse | 17 (70.8) | 13 (72.2) | 13 (72.2) | |
| Significant relationship | 3 (12.5) | 3 (14.3) | 2 (11.1) | |
| Single | 2 (8.3) | 2 (9.5) | 2 (11.1) | |
| Widower | 2 (8.3) | 3 (14.3) | 1 (5.6) | |
|
| ||||
| Work status, N (%) | 0.984 | |||
| Unemployed | 1 (4.2) | 1 (4.8) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Part time | 3 (12.5) | 1 (4.8) | 1 (5.6) | |
| Full time | 2 (8.3) | 3 (14.3) | 2 (11.1) | |
| Retired | 18 (75.0) | 16 (76.2) | 15 (83.3) | |
|
| ||||
| Educational status, N (%) | 0.219 | |||
| Primary or less | 8 (33.3) | 9 (32.8) | 5 (27.8) | |
| Some high/technical | 4 (16.7) | 3 (14.3) | 3 (16.7) | |
| Secondary | 4 (16.7) | 2 (9.5) | 6 (33.3) | |
| Some university | 3 (12.5) | 3 (14.3) | 1 (5.6) | |
| University graduate | 1 (4.2) | 4 (19.0) | 3 (16.7) | |
| Postgraduate | 4 (16.7) | 4 (19.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
|
| ||||
| Annual combined household income (₦), N (%) | 0.356 | |||
| <1,000,000 | 17 (70.8) | 15 (71.4) | 14 (77.8) | |
| 1,000,000–3,000,000 | 6 (25.0) | 3 (14.3) | 4 (22.2) | |
| 3,000,001–10,000,000 | 1 (4.2) | 0 (0.0) | 17 (94.4) | |
| More than 10,000,000 | 0 (0.0) | 3 (14.3) | 0 (0.0) | |
|
| ||||
| Average Gleason score | 7.8 | 7.6 | 8.4 | 0.133 |
Summary of perioperative events.
| Technical parameters | BSO | BSCO | BESO |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean operating time (SD) in minutes | 46.65 (7.8) | 44.62 (16.7) | 46.9 (11.1) | 0.293 |
| Sedation required, frequency (%) | 13 (54.2) | 11 (52.4) | 9 (50.0) | 0.938 |
| Mean suture number, mean (SD) | 2.9 (0.8) | 2.6 (0.7) | 2.6 (0.5 | 0.215 |
| Number of complications, mean (SD) | 0.86 (0.9) | 0.35 (0.8) | 0.43 (0.8) | 0.118 |
Independent samples t-test used.
Figure 5Serum testosterone and PSA trend over time (repeated measures ANOVA with Greenhouse–Geisser correction).
The mean (SD) postoperative EPIC-26 scores of those without (Group I) and with (Group II) pseudotesticles.
| Preoperatively | Postoperatively | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I | Group II |
| Group I | Group II |
| |
| Urinary incontinence | 64.44 (29.61) | 73.76 (25.99) | 0.283 | 68.36 (32.14) | 85.56 (20.81) | 0.096 |
| Urinary LUTS | 81.25 (17.42) | 77.42 (23.20) | 0.547 | 80.80 (21.01) | 85.00 (21.59) | 0.577 |
| Bowel domain | 83.73 (11.36) | 80.4 (17.63) | 0.464 | 94.79 (7.53) | 90.34 (13.75) | 0.250 |
| Sexual function | 22.05 (26.70) | 27.13 (29.36) | 0.529 | 9.41 (18.65) | 30.54 (30.44) |
|
| Sexual bother | 59.52 (36.64) | 62.50 (42.12) | 0.792 | 59.72 (38.48) | 67.86 (35.48) | 0.497 |
| Hormonal/vitality domain | 82.14 (19.91) | 82.5 (17.51) | 0.946 | 90.00 (15.81) | 90.48 (10.94) | 0.913 |
Figure 6Comparison of the postoperative (a) RV2 and (b) LV2 pseudotesticular volumes.
Comparison between the testicular and pseudotesticular volumes from the different orchidectomies (significant differences in volume are emboldened).
| Orchidometric volume | BSO | BSCO | BESO |
|---|---|---|---|
| RV1 | 20.2 (8.9) | 18.1 (6.7) | 18.2 (6.7) |
| RV2 | 0.2 (1.0) | 10.3 (4.7) | 8.3 (8.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| LV1 | 19.6 (8.5) | 15.6 (9.7) | 15.7 (5.8) |
| LV2 | 0.0 (0.0) | 6.5 (8.2) | 5.8 (6.9) |
|
|
| 0.216 |
|
RV1: preoperative right testicular volume; RV2: postoperative right pseudotesticular volume; LV1: preoperative left testicular volume; LV2: postoperative pseudotesticular volume.
Figure 7Initial postoperative photographs of patients who had (a) BSO, (b) BSCO, and (c) BESO.
Figure 8Complications of the patients in the different orchidectomy groups.
Comparison of patient satisfaction with surgery done.
| BSO | BSCO | BESO |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Satisfaction score, mean (SD) | 77.9 (22.8) | 81.0 (13.9) | 81.9 (22.5) | 0.858 |
| I feel my testes are smaller postop, N (%) | 13 (72.2) | 8 (88.9) | 7 (53.8) | 0.360 |
| I feel less like a man, N (%) | 11 (64.7) | 3 (33.3) | 3 (23.1) | 0.036 |
| I feel my well-being has been compromised, N (%) | 3 (16.7) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (15.4) | 0.363 |
|
| ||||
| Group I | Group II |
| ||
| Satisfaction score, mean (SD) | 77.9 (22.8) | 81.52 (18.9) | 0.584 | |
| I feel my testes are smaller postop, N (%) | 12 (70.6) | 15 (68.2) | 0.654 | |
| I feel less like a man, N (%) | 11 (68.8) | 6 (27.3) | 0.010 | |
| I feel my well-being has been compromised, N (%) | 3 (16.7) | 2 (8.3) | 0.182 | |
Group I: no pseudotesticles; Group II: pseudotesticles (BSCO and BESO).