Literature DB >> 19450844

Decreasing use of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists in the United States is Independent of Reimbursement Changes: A Medicare and Veterans Health Administration claims analysis.

Steven L Chang1, Joseph C Liao, Rajesh Shinghal.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists are the most common form of androgen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer. Limited data exist regarding physician decision-making in prescribing luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists. We present an analysis of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist use trends based on a time matched comparison of data from Medicare and the Veterans Health Administration, a health care system unaffected by recent changes in Medicare reimbursement implemented by the Medicare Modernization Act in 2004.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medicare claims and payment data were obtained from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services from 2003 to 2007 for luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists and for simple orchiectomy. The Veterans Health Administration Pharmacy Benefits Management database was queried for the annual number of prescriptions for luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists during the same period.
RESULTS: After implementation of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act in 2004 the reimbursement of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists in the Medicare population decreased by 54.8% and annual claims decreased by 25.1% from 2004 to 2007. During the same period luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist use decreased by 16.8% in the Veterans Health Administration population. There was no compensatory increase in the use of simple orchiectomy for androgen deprivation therapy during the study period.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists has decreased in the Medicare and Veterans Health Administration populations since 2004 without a compensatory increase in the use of alternative forms of androgen deprivation therapy. The shift in practice patterns is likely due to a decrease in Medicare reimbursement for these drugs, an increase in the use of intermittent therapy and increased recognition of the adverse effects associated with androgen deprivation therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19450844     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  14 in total

1.  Prostate cancer: intermittent ADT--tales from a 27-year odyssey.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Treatment of Metastatic Prostate Cancer in Older Adults.

Authors:  Kah Poh Loh; Supriya G Mohile; Elizabeth Kessler; Chunkit Fung
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Longitudinal evidence on punctal plug use in an elderly population.

Authors:  Sulene L Chi; Kofi F Acquah; Michael J Richard; Paul P Lee; Frank A Sloan
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.746

4.  Are Small Reimbursement Changes Enough to Change Cancer Care? Reimbursement Variation in Prostate Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Shellie D Ellis; Ronald C Chen; Stacie B Dusetzina; Stephanie B Wheeler; George L Jackson; Matthew E Nielsen; William R Carpenter; Morris Weinberger
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  The relation between age and androgen deprivation therapy use among men in the Medicare population receiving radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer L Quon; James B Yu; Pamela R Soulos; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 6.  Intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation therapy in advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Health care costs for prostate cancer patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy: treatment and adverse events.

Authors:  M D Krahn; K E Bremner; J Luo; S M H Alibhai
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.677

8.  Satisfaction and genital perception after orchiectomy for prostate cancer: does the technique matter? A randomized trial.

Authors:  Onkar Singh; Partho Mukherjee; M S Sakthivel; Cornerstone Wann; A J P George; Rajesh Gopalakrishnan; Belavendra Antonisamy; Antony Devasia; Santosh Kumar; Nitin S Kekre; J Chandrasingh
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 9.  Pharmaceutical policies: effects of financial incentives for prescribers.

Authors:  Arash Rashidian; Amir-Houshang Omidvari; Yasaman Vali; Heidrun Sturm; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-04

10.  Subcapsular orchiectomy in the primary therapy of patients with bone metastasis in advanced prostate cancer: an anachronistic intervention?

Authors:  Oleg Rud; Julia Peter; Reza Kheyri; Christian Gilfrich; Ali M Ahmed; Wieland Boeckmann; Paul G Fabricius; Matthias May
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2011-09-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.