Literature DB >> 33849591

Comparison of radiographic changes in rectangular curved short stem with thin versus thick porous coating for cementless total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study with a propensity score matching.

Yutaro Munakata1, Yujiro Kuramitsu1, Yutaka Usui1, Ken Okazaki2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radiographic changes that appear relatively quickly after fixation of cementless stem in total hip arthroplasty (THA) vary depending on the stem design and fixation style. The present study compared radiographic changes between two types of rectangular curved short stems of similar shape.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 118 hips that underwent primary cementless THA with an anterolateral supine approach using a rectangular, curved, short stem performed by the same surgeon between June 2015 and June 2019. Among the examined hips, 39 had a thicker porous coating stem (thicker group) and 66 had a thinner porous coating and reduced tip stem (thinner group) and at least 12-month follow-up. Radiographs taken during the final course observation were assessed. Propensity score matching was performed based on demographic data and comparisons were made using pairs of 25 hips each. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test and p values ≤ 0.05 indicated statistical significance.
RESULTS: The pattern of the radiolucent lines showed a significant difference after matching (p = 0.0044). A "proximal and distal" pattern was most common in the thicker group and a "distal only" pattern was most common in the thinner group. There was notable and significant difference in cortical hypertrophy in the thicker group after matching (p = 0.024).
CONCLUSIONS: Although the two short stems were similar shapes, the short-term radiographic changes were different. The thinner group showed fewer radiographic changes than the thicker group, making it a more "silent" stem.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Propensity score matched analysis; Radiologic evaluation; Short stems

Year:  2021        PMID: 33849591     DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02397-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res        ISSN: 1749-799X            Impact factor:   2.359


  25 in total

1.  Bone remodelling after femoral short stem implantation in total hip arthroplasty: 1-year results from a randomized DEXA study.

Authors:  Tobias Freitag; Marie-Anne Hein; Dirk Wernerus; Heiko Reichel; Ralf Bieger
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 2.  The operation of the century: total hip replacement.

Authors:  Ian D Learmonth; Claire Young; Cecil Rorabeck
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-10-27       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Comparison of Bone Remodeling Between an Anatomic Short Stem and a Straight Stem in 1-Stage Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gaku Koyano; Tetsuya Jinno; Daisuke Koga; Yuki Yamauchi; Takeshi Muneta; Atsushi Okawa
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Radiolucent lines and osteolysis along tapered straight cementless titanium hip stems: a comparison of 6-year and 10-year follow-up results in 95 patients.

Authors:  Karl A Zweymüller; Ulrike M Schwarzinger; Martin S Steindl
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 5.  Short bone-conserving stems in cementless hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Harpal S Khanuja; Samik Banerjee; Deepak Jain; Robert Pivec; Michael A Mont
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Short Stems Versus Conventional Stems in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Long-Term Registry Study.

Authors:  Federico Giardina; Francesco Castagnini; Susanna Stea; Barbara Bordini; Maurizio Montalti; Aldo Toni
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 7.  Short-stem prostheses in primary total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Shao-Chuan Huo; Fan Wang; Lu-Jue Dong; Wei Wei; Jing-Qi Zeng; Hong-Xing Huang; Qing-Min Han; Rui-Qi Duan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Cortical hypertrophy with a short, curved uncemented hip stem does not have any clinical impact during early follow-up.

Authors:  Michael W Maier; Marcus R Streit; Moritz M Innmann; Marlis Krüger; Jan Nadorf; J Philippe Kretzer; Volker Ewerbeck; Tobias Gotterbarm
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Prospective 5-year study with 96 short curved Fitmore™ hip stems shows a high incidence of cortical hypertrophy with no clinical relevance.

Authors:  Caroline Thalmann; Patricia Kempter; Karl Stoffel; Thea Ziswiler; Arno Frigg
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  A comparison of a short versus a conventional femoral cementless stem in total hip arthroplasty in patients 70 years and older.

Authors:  Huachen Yu; Haixiao Liu; Man Jia; Yuezheng Hu; Yu Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.