Literature DB >> 26613788

Bone remodelling after femoral short stem implantation in total hip arthroplasty: 1-year results from a randomized DEXA study.

Tobias Freitag1, Marie-Anne Hein1, Dirk Wernerus1, Heiko Reichel1, Ralf Bieger2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Short stem prostheses have been developed to preserve proximal femoral bone stock. This prospective, randomized study compared periprosthetic bone remodelling following short and straight stem implantation 1 year after surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and forty-four consecutive patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty were randomized to either a Fitmore short or a cementless straight stem (both Zimmer, Winterthur, Switzerland). Periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry performed the day before surgery and at 7 days, 3 months and 1 year postoperatively. Furthermore, the HHS and the WOMAC were obtained.
RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-eight patients completed 1-year follow-up. Periprosthetic BMD changes at 1 year were most pronounced in the proximal medial region of interest (ROI) 7 with -17.2% after short stem and -16.7% after straight implantation (p = 0.67). However, there was significantly less BMD reduction in ROI 6 following short (-4.7%) versus straight stem (-10.8%) implantation (p = 0.01). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the HHS and the WOMAC either before or after surgery.
CONCLUSION: One year after surgery, both stems showed an implant-specific periprosthetic bone remodelling. Nevertheless, proximal load transfer was more pronounced after short stem implantation than with a straight stem.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; DEXA; Hip; Prosthesis design; Short stem; Stress shielding

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26613788     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-015-2370-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  30 in total

1.  Development of periprosthetic bone mass density around the cementless Metha® short hip stem during three year follow up-a prospective radiological and clinical study.

Authors:  Laura Augustin; Sarah Boller; Cathrein Bobach; Alexander Jahnke; Gafar Adam Ahmed; Markus Rickert; Bernd Alexander Ishaque
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Periprosthetic bone remodelling of short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shuang G Yan; Patrick Weber; Arnd Steinbrück; Xingyi Hua; Volkmar Jansson; Florian Schmidutz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Bone remodelling around the Metha® short stem implant - Clinical and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) results.

Authors:  Markus Fischer; Nicholas A Beckmann; Hans-Georg Simank
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-08-09

4.  High incidence of early subtrochanteric lateral cortical atrophy after hip arthroplasty using bone-conserving short stem.

Authors:  Yoon Je Cho; Chan Il Bae; Wan Keun Yoon; Young Soo Chun; Kee Hyung Rhyu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Femoral bone remodeling after short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a prospective densitometric study.

Authors:  Josef Hochreiter; Georg Mattiassich; Reinhold Ortmaier; Martin Steinmair; Conrad Anderl
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Comparative Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviour of Two Cementless Short Stems for Hip Replacement: Linea Anatomic and Minihip.

Authors:  Sergio Gabarre; Antonio Herrera; Elena Ibarz; Jesús Mateo; Jorge Gil-Albarova; Luis Gracia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Short-stem prostheses in primary total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Shao-Chuan Huo; Fan Wang; Lu-Jue Dong; Wei Wei; Jing-Qi Zeng; Hong-Xing Huang; Qing-Min Han; Rui-Qi Duan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  [Bone remodeling after total hip arthroplasty with anatomic medullary locking prosthesis and its long-term effectiveness].

Authors:  Yongwang Li; Rongli He; Qian Zhang; Ming An; Hui Qi; Wenhai Ma; Xingjian Song; Junying Sun
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-06-15

9.  No Clinically Important Differences in Thigh Pain or Bone Loss Between Short Stems and Conventional-length Stems in THA: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Seok-Hyung Won; Jung-Wee Park; Young-Kyun Lee; Yong-Chan Ha; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Study of the bone behavior around a neck preserving short stem implant: bone densitometric analysis over a span of two years.

Authors:  Tarek Abdel Shafy; Adel Sayed; Ahmed H Abdelazeem
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2016-10-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.