Literature DB >> 27554784

Comparison of Bone Remodeling Between an Anatomic Short Stem and a Straight Stem in 1-Stage Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Gaku Koyano1, Tetsuya Jinno1, Daisuke Koga1, Yuki Yamauchi1, Takeshi Muneta1, Atsushi Okawa1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Femurs of dysplastic hips exhibit specific abnormalities, and use of modular or specially designed components is recommended. An anatomic short stem was previously designed specifically for dysplastic hips using 3-dimensional data acquired from dysplastic patients. To investigate effects of stem geometry on bone remodeling, we undertook a prospective, randomized study of patients who had undergone 1-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the anatomic short stem on one side and a conventional straight stem on the other.
METHODS: The study included 36 patients who underwent the above THA procedure. We assessed bone mineral density as well as the presence of cancellous condensation or bony atrophy due to stress shielding based on the analysis of Gruen's zones and newly defined equal-interval zones, at an average follow-up period of 9.2 years.
RESULTS: All stems were bone ingrown stable. Cancellous condensation was observed more proximally, and areas of bone atrophy were narrower on the anatomic short stem side than on the straight stem side. Bone mineral density values reflected results of cancellous condensation and stress shielding and were higher in more proximal zones on the anatomic short stem side than on the straight stem side.
CONCLUSION: Although radiographic results indicated good midterm outcomes of THA with both stems, the loading pattern differed. The anatomic short stem achieved its design purpose in terms of proximal fixation and load transfer and led to better preservation of the proximal femur.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone mineral density; cancellous condensation; cortical hypertrophy; dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; stem geometry; stress shielding

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27554784     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.07.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  19 in total

1.  Comparison of 5-year postoperative results between standard-length stems and short stems in one-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Masanobu Hirao; Kazumasa Miyatake; Daisuke Koga; Ryohei Takada; Gaku Koyano; Atsushi Okawa; Tetsuya Jinno
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-11-10

2.  Longitudinal morphological change of acetabular subchondral bone cyst after total hip arthroplasty in developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Ryohei Takada; Tetsuya Jinno; Kazumasa Miyatake; Yuki Yamauchi; Daisuke Koga; Kazuyoshi Yagishita; Atsushi Okawa
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-01-03

3.  Comparison of two different stems for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pedram Yavari; Bahareh Baghchi; Mehdi Tavassoli; Pouya Moshkdar; Sepehr Eslami; Amirhossein Sadeghian; Ghasem Mohammadsharifi
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2021-06-15

4.  Comparison of Bone Preservation in Elderly Patients with Femoral Neck Fracture After Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty Using Shorter Femoral Stem and Standard Femoral Stem.

Authors:  Jae-Young Lim; Hyeong-Jun Park; Young-Kyun Lee; Yong-Chan Ha; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 1.251

5.  Short to Midterm Follow-Up of Periprosthetic Bone Mineral Density after Total Hip Arthroplasty with the Ribbed Anatomic Stem.

Authors:  Xiang-Dong Wu; Mian Tian; Yao He; Hong Chen; Yu Chen; Rahul Mishra; Wei Liu; Wei Huang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  [Bone remodeling after total hip arthroplasty with anatomic medullary locking prosthesis and its long-term effectiveness].

Authors:  Yongwang Li; Rongli He; Qian Zhang; Ming An; Hui Qi; Wenhai Ma; Xingjian Song; Junying Sun
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-06-15

7.  No Clinically Important Differences in Thigh Pain or Bone Loss Between Short Stems and Conventional-length Stems in THA: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Seok-Hyung Won; Jung-Wee Park; Young-Kyun Lee; Yong-Chan Ha; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Comparison of Bone Remodeling Between Collum Femoris-Preserving Stems and Ribbed Stems in 1-Stage Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Zeming Liu; Bo Liu; Sikai Liu; Mengnan Li; Xiao Chen; Yongtai Han
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-05-15

9.  Long-term results of an anatomically implanted hip arthroplasty with a short stem prosthesis (MiniHipTM).

Authors:  Lars V von Engelhardt; Andreas Breil-Wirth; Christian Kothny; Jörn Bengt Seeger; Christian Grasselli; Joerg Jerosch
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2018-10-18

10.  Are short-stem prostheses superior to conventional stem prostheses in primary total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Hao-Dong Liang; Wei-Yi Yang; Jian-Ke Pan; He-Tao Huang; Ming-Hui Luo; Ling-Feng Zeng; Jun Liu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.