Literature DB >> 3384829

Measurement of the trunk musculature of active males using CT scan radiography: implications for force and moment generating capacity about the L4/L5 joint.

S M McGill1, N Patt, R W Norman.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to add to the growing database of cross-sectional areas and moment arm lengths of trunk musculature using the methods of computerized tomographic scanning. An attempt was also made to estimate muscle force and moment generating capacity under various reported values of muscle force per unit cross-sectional area. The data were obtained on 13 active men 40.5 +/- 11.9 years of age, 173.8 +/- 5.9 cm tall and 89.1 +/- 11.7 kg body mass. Transverse CT scans were taken at the level of the L4/L5 disc with the subjects supine. Muscle cross-sectional areas were measured from 35 mm slides of the scans using a planimeter and moment arm length in the transverse plane were taken from the centroid of the L4/L5 disc to the centroid of the muscle section. Prior to estimating force and moment generating capacity, areas were corrected, where necessary, for fibre pennation angle to produce a physiological cross-sectional area. The physiological cross-sectional areas (cm2) for one side of the body were (mean +/- S.D.): sacrospinalis (SS) 15.9 +/- 2.5; multifidus (Mu) 4.2 +/- 0.7; psoas (Ps) 17.6 +/- 4.0; rectus abdominis (RA) 7.9 +/- 2.5; external oblique (EO) 9.4 +/- 2.7; internal oblique (IO) 8.1 +/- 2.3; transverse abdominus (TA) 2.9 +/- 1.3. The anterior posterior moment arm lengths were: erector mass (SS and Mu combined) 5.90 +/- 0.52; Ps 0.58 +/- 0.40; R.A. 10.28 +/- 2.07; E.O. (anterior portion) 5.94 +/- 1.39; E.O. (posterior portion) 2.08 +/- 1.39; I.O. (anterior portion) 6.92 +/- 1.63; I.O. (posterior portion) 3.85 +/- 1.54. The corresponding lateral moment arm lengths were: 3.26 +/- 0.36; 4.88 +/- 0.36; 4.35 +/- 1.31; 12.86 +/- 1.93; 13.95 +/- 1.16; 10.77 +/- 2.02; 12.52 +/- 1.26. The maximum force per unit cross-section that human muscles are capable of generating is not well defined. However, assuming an intermediate value of 50 N cm-2 of physiological cross-section, the erector musculature observed at the L4/L5 level should be capable of generating an extensor moment of about 118 N.m. At a muscle stress of 30 or 90 N cm-2, values also reported on human muscle, the moment would be 71 and 213 Nm, respectively. It must be remembered, however, that muscles not observable at the L4/L5 level can create moments around that center of rotation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3384829     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(88)90262-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  14 in total

1.  Electro and acoustic myography for noninvasive assessment of lumbar paraspinal muscle function.

Authors:  D J Lee; M J Stokes; R J Taylor; R G Cooper
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1992

2.  Spinal muscle forces, internal loads and stability in standing under various postures and loads--application of kinematics-based algorithm.

Authors:  A Shirazi-Adl; M El-Rich; D G Pop; M Parnianpour
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-09-25       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Changes in the cross-sectional area of multifidus and psoas in unilateral sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Wook Ha Kim; Sang-Ho Lee; Dong Yeob Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2011-09-30

4.  Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads.

Authors:  Babak Bazrgari; Aboulfazl Shirazi-Adl; Navid Arjmand
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Activation amplitude patterns do not change for back muscles but are altered for abdominal muscles between dominant and non-dominant hands during one-handed lifts.

Authors:  Heather L Butler; Cheryl L Hubley-Kozey; John W Kozey
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Morphometry of the human thigh muscles. A comparison between anatomical sections and computer tomographic and magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  C M Engstrom; G E Loeb; J G Reid; W J Forrest; L Avruch
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Regressions for estimating muscle parameters in the thoracic and lumbar trunk for use in musculoskeletal modeling.

Authors:  Dennis E Anderson; John M D'Agostino; Alexander G Bruno; Rajaram K Manoharan; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Psoas Major: a case report and review of its anatomy, biomechanics, and clinical implications.

Authors:  Sandy Sajko; Kent Stuber
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2009-12

9.  The moment arms of the muscles spanning the glenohumeral joint: a systematic review.

Authors:  Freya Hik; David C Ackland
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.610

10.  Response of the trunk muscles to training assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and muscle strength.

Authors:  R Parkkola; U Kujala; U Rytökoski
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1992
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.