Literature DB >> 1917669

Morphometry of the human thigh muscles. A comparison between anatomical sections and computer tomographic and magnetic resonance images.

C M Engstrom1, G E Loeb, J G Reid, W J Forrest, L Avruch.   

Abstract

The present study examined the relative accuracy and precision of MR and CT procedures for determining the CSA of individual muscles from the human thigh. Serial AN, CT and MR cross-sections were obtained from three cadaveric lower limbs. The MR measurements provided accurate and precise values for the CSAs of most thigh muscles, generally within +/- 7.5% of the AN standard. In contrast, CT tended systematically to overestimate the AN CSA by 10-20%. Retest procedures indicated that highly reliable measurements could be obtained from both MR and CT images. However, subjective interpretations of boundaries between closely apposed muscle bellies, particularly for muscles with more than one head, were necessary for resolving entities in the imaging records and this decreased the relative accuracy of MR and CT measures. Interestingly, MR records demonstrated an incomplete septum between vastus lateralis and vastus intermedius more prominently than AN cross-sections. The novel cross-validation procedures used in this study also highlighted several system-based errors in the MR records that, if undetected and left uncorrected, would have seriously biased the morphometric data obtained with this technique. In general, MR provides high resolution images of the human thigh muscles which may be used to obtain valid measures of the CSA of these structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1917669      PMCID: PMC1260321     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  41 in total

1.  Muscle fiber architecture in the human lower limb.

Authors:  J A Friederich; R A Brand
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Muscle fibre type distribution, muscle cross-sectional area and maximal voluntary strength in humans.

Authors:  P Schantz; E Randall-Fox; W Hutchison; A Tydén; P O Astrand
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1983-02

Review 3.  Safety aspects of NMR clinical imaging.

Authors:  R D Saunders; H Smith
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 4.291

4.  The influence of variations in muscle fibre composition on muscle strength and cross-sectional area in untrained males.

Authors:  R J Maughan; M A Nimmo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Relationships between muscle strength and muscle cross-sectional area in male sprinters and endurance runners.

Authors:  R J Maughan; J S Watson; J Weir
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1983

6.  Strength and cross-sectional area of human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  R J Maughan; J S Watson; J Weir
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Cross-sectional area of the thigh muscle in man measured by computed tomography.

Authors:  T Häggmark; E Jansson; B Svane
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 1.713

8.  A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion.

Authors:  R D Crowninshield; R A Brand
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Detection and correction of geometrical distortion in x-ray fluoroscopic images.

Authors:  W A Wallace; F Johnson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Spin warp NMR imaging and applications to human whole-body imaging.

Authors:  W A Edelstein; J M Hutchison; G Johnson; T Redpath
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  30 in total

1.  Diffusion tensor imaging in biomechanical studies of skeletal muscle function.

Authors:  C C Van Donkelaar; L J Kretzers; P H Bovendeerd; L M Lataster; K Nicolay; J D Janssen; M R Drost
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  The accuracy of volume estimates using ultrasound muscle thickness measurements in different muscle groups.

Authors:  Masae Miyatani; Hiroaki Kanehisa; Masamitsu Ito; Yasuo Kawakami; Tetsuo Fukunaga
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-10-21       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Mechanisms of strength gain in a handgrip exercise programme in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  C A Speed; R Campbell
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 2.631

4.  Author's reply to Steele and Fisher: "Scientific rigour: a heavy or light load to carry?": the importance of maintaining objectivity in drawing evidence-based conclusions.

Authors:  B Schoenfeld
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Panoramic ultrasonography is a valid method to measure changes in skeletal muscle cross-sectional area.

Authors:  Juha P Ahtiainen; Merja Hoffren; Juha J Hulmi; Mikko Pietikäinen; Antti A Mero; Janne Avela; Keijo Häkkinen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Measurement of the quadriceps femoris muscle using magnetic resonance and ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  J M Walton; N Roberts; G H Whitehouse
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 13.800

7.  The interaction between the vastus medialis and vastus intermedius and its influence on the extensor apparatus of the knee joint.

Authors:  Karl Grob; Mirjana Manestar; Luis Filgueira; Markus S Kuster; Helen Gilbey; Timothy Ackland
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Contact of the incisive canal and upper central incisors causing root resorption after retraction with orthodontic mini-implants: A CBCT study.

Authors:  Yichen Pan; Si Chen
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  CURRENT CONCEPTS OF MUSCLE AND TENDON ADAPTATION TO STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING.

Authors:  Jason Brumitt; Tyler Cuddeford
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-11

10.  Structural and functional anatomy of the neck musculature of the dog (Canis familiaris).

Authors:  Amnon Sharir; Joshua Milgram; Ron Shahar
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.