Literature DB >> 19205724

Activation amplitude patterns do not change for back muscles but are altered for abdominal muscles between dominant and non-dominant hands during one-handed lifts.

Heather L Butler1, Cheryl L Hubley-Kozey, John W Kozey.   

Abstract

It is assumed when lifting with the dominant hand that the relationship between contralateral and ipsilateral trunk muscle responses are similar to when lifting with the non-dominant hand. The purpose of this study was to quantify trunk muscle activation amplitude patterns during right- and left-handed lifts. Surface electromyography (EMG) and kinematic variables were recorded from 29 healthy subjects. Minimal trunk and pelvis motion was observed. Three principal patterns accounted for 95% of the variation in the EMG data indicating minimal variation in the pattern. Significant differences in scores captured different recruitment strategies for reach and hand. Selective and differential recruitment of back sites characterized lifts at greater distances from the body, whereas co-activation between internal oblique and back sites characterized lifts closer to the body. While the results showed no handedness effect for back muscles, the external oblique responded differently between right- and left-handed lifts. Specific recruitment strategies were used to account for subtle changes in reach and asymmetrical demands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19205724     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-009-0994-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  54 in total

1.  Response of trunk muscle coactivation to changes in spinal stability.

Authors:  K P Granata; K F Orishimo
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Selective activation of the external oblique musculature during axial torque production.

Authors:  G Mirka; D Kelaher; A Baker; A Harrison; J Davis
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Handedness: dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics.

Authors:  Leia B Bagesteiro; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  A possible methodological flaw in comparing dominant and nondominant sided lumbar spine muscle responses without simultaneously considering hand dominance.

Authors:  Paul S Sung; Kevin F Spratt; David G Wilder
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Effects of different levels of torso coactivation on trunk muscular and kinematic responses to posteriorly applied sudden loads.

Authors:  Francisco J Vera-Garcia; Stephen H M Brown; John R Gray; Stuart M McGill
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2006-01-27       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  Changes in trunk muscle activation and lumbar-pelvic position associated with abdominal hollowing and reach during a simulated manual material handling task.

Authors:  Heather L Butler; Cheryl L Hubley-Kozey; John W Kozey
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Relative efficiency of abdominal muscles in spine stability.

Authors:  N Arjmand; A Shirazi-Adl; M Parnianpour
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.763

8.  Appropriately placed surface EMG electrodes reflect deep muscle activity (psoas, quadratus lumborum, abdominal wall) in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  S McGill; D Juker; P Kropf
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Pain and motor control of the lumbopelvic region: effect and possible mechanisms.

Authors:  Paul W Hodges; G Lorimer Moseley
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.368

10.  Electromyographic activity of the abdominal and low back musculature during the generation of isometric and dynamic axial trunk torque: implications for lumbar mechanics.

Authors:  S M McGill
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparisons of Lumbar Muscle Performance Between Minimally-Invasive and Open Lumbar Fusion Surgery at 1-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Meng-Ling Lu; Chih-Hsiu Cheng; Wen-Chien Chen; Chen-Ju Fu; Chi-Chien Niu
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-12-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.