| Literature DB >> 33837278 |
Iago Maceda1,2,3, Miguel Martín Álvarez4, Pedro Moral4, Oscar Lao5,6,7, Georgios Athanasiadis8, Raúl Tonda1,2,3, Jordi Camps1,2,3, Sergi Beltran1,2,3, Agustí Camps9, Jordi Fàbrega10, Josefina Felisart11, Joan Grané12, José Luis Remón13, Jordi Serra14.
Abstract
The area of the Spanish Pyrenees is particularly interesting for studying the demographic dynamics of European rural areas given its orography, the main traditional rural condition of its population and the reported higher patterns of consanguinity of the region. Previous genetic studies suggest a gradient of genetic continuity of the area in the West to East axis. However, it has been shown that micro-population substructure can be detected when considering high-quality NGS data and using spatial explicit methods. In this work, we have analyzed the genome of 30 individuals sequenced at 40× from five different valleys in the Spanish Eastern Pyrenees (SEP) separated by less than 140 km along a west to east axis. Using haplotype-based methods and spatial analyses, we have been able to detect micro-population substructure within SEP not seen in previous studies. Linkage disequilibrium and autozygosity analyses suggest that the SEP populations show diverse demographic histories. In agreement with these results, demographic modeling by means of ABC-DL identify heterogeneity in their effective population sizes despite of their close geographic proximity, and suggests that the population substructure within SEP could have appeared around 2500 years ago. Overall, these results suggest that each rural population of the Pyrenees could represent a unique entity.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33837278 PMCID: PMC8484665 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-021-00875-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Hum Genet ISSN: 1018-4813 Impact factor: 4.246
Fig. 1Representation of the demography used in the ABC_DL approach. All numbers represent the median of the posterior distribution.
Migration between actual populations is included in the demographic model, but not plotted in this graphic. Times of split represent years before present assuming 29 years by generation [37]. (G: Garrotxa; R: Ripollès; U: Alt Urgell; B: Berguedà; P: Pallars; GRUBP: meta-population of the Pyrenees; GR: meta-population of the subgroup formed by Garrotxa and Ripollès; UPB: meta-population of the subgroup formed by Alt Urgell, Pallars, and Berguedà; tGRUBP: time of split of the meta-population in the two sub populations; tGR: time of split of the meta-population for the Garrotxa and Ripollès subgroup; tUPB: time of split of the meta-population for the Alt Urgell, Pallars, and Berguedà).
Prior distributions, mean, median, half mode range, 95% credible interval (CI 2.5–97.5%) and 89% Highest Density Interval (HDI) of the posterior distributions for the effective population size of the meta-population (NeGRUBP), meta-population of the Garrotxa-Ripollès cluster (NeGR), meta-population of the Urgell-Berguedà-Pallars cluster (NeUPB), Garrotxa (NeG), Ripollès (NeR), Urgell (NeU), Berguedà (NeB), and Pallars (NeP) and the time of the split (tGRUBP, tGR, and tUBP) in years before present, assuming a generation time of 29 years [37] estimated using ABC-DL.
| Prior | Posterior | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Median | Half range mode | CI 2.5% | CI 97.5% | Low HDI | High HDI | ||
| NeGRUPB | U (15000, 40000) | 26937.89 | 27079.55 | 27189.87 | 25469.85 | 27477.40 | 26258.71 | 27585.47 |
| NeGR | U (1000, 5000) | 1673.31 | 1586.39 | 1271.04 | 1019.46 | 2832.32 | 1004.09 | 2268.51 |
| NeUPB | U (1000, 5000) | 1307.32 | 1248.50 | 1009.04 | 1009.96 | 1943.13 | 1000.98 | 1628.88 |
| NeG | U (500, 2500) | 855.28 | 840.17 | 882.52 | 523.68 | 1333.39 | 500.87 | 1113.76 |
| NeR | U (500, 2500) | 1678.49 | 1678.87 | 1544.19 | 806.70 | 2452.33 | 1106.79 | 2484.24 |
| NeU | U (200, 2000) | 332.79 | 320.11 | 289.09 | 207.48 | 539.60 | 200.55 | 445.53 |
| NeP | U (500, 2500) | 744.77 | 719.12 | 675.06 | 509.81 | 1124.30 | 500.92 | 966.54 |
| NeB | U (500, 10000) | 7566.18 | 7766.21 | 9836.68 | 4054.06 | 9904.54 | 5250.46 | 9988.18 |
| tGRUBP | U (2320, 14500) | 2543.51 | 2480.21 | 2334.04 | 2333.51 | 3087.88 | 2330.91 | 2812.27 |
| tGR | U (870, tGRUPB) | 2079.06 | 1960.69 | 1554.95 | 942.59 | 3834.94 | 892.55 | 3053.28 |
| tUPB | U (870, tGRUPB) | 1799.98 | 1698.16 | 1235.55 | 925.78 | 3152.49 | 894.68 | 2587.97 |
All prior distributions follow a Uniform distribution (U). Nevertheless, since tGR and tUBP depend on tGRUBP, the final shape of these prior distributions is not Uniform.
Fig. 2Genetic variation of SEP.
A Metric MDS of the samples from SEP. B Map showing SEP painted accordingly to the cluster they belong to. Ripollès samples are artificially dispersed for the sake of clarity. Simplified fineSTRUCTURE tree of SEP samples, showing six clusters which can be further summarized in two main groups: Garrotxa-Ripollès and Pallars-Alt Urgell-Berguedà.
Fig. 3Autozygosity, inbreeding, and LD in SEP.
A Genetic barrier between Garrotxa-Ripollès (red dots) and Pallars-Alt Urgell-Berguedà (blue dots) identified by an algorithm that models the genetic variation present in the data in terms of anisotropy and genetic barriers. B EEMS result also state a migration barrier between Garrotxa-Ripollès and Pallars-Alt Urgell-Berguedà.
Fig. 4Decay of LD and ROH and HetR of SEP and SpExomes samples.
A LD decay in SEP samples using WGS. B LD decay of SEP samples with the Spanish exomes dataset using exome sequencing data. C Violin plot of the total amount of homozygous fragments in each SEP individual using WGS.