| Literature DB >> 33836692 |
Mohamed Elprince1, Omima T Taha2, Zakia M Ibrahim1, Rasha E Khamees1, Mahmoud A Greash1, Khaled A Atwa1, Ahmed M Gadallah1, Noha Al-Okda1, Radwa M Abdel Aal1, Mohamed F Ibrahim1, Ahmed A Aboelroose1, Osama E Ashour1, Asmaa M Elgedawy1, Amira M Elbahie1, Hanan M Ghoneim1, Amal A Ahmed1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The current fact of increasing rates of cesarean deliveries is a catastrophe. Recurrent cesareans result in intraperitoneal adhesions that would lead to maternal morbidity during delivery. Great efforts are directed towards the prediction of intraperitoneal adhesions to provide the best care for laboring women. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the role of abdominal striae and cesarean scar characters in the prediction of intraperitoneal adhesions.Entities:
Keywords: Adhesions; Cesarean scar; Prediction; Striae
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33836692 PMCID: PMC8033650 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03763-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ISSN: 1471-2393 Impact factor: 3.007
Patient demographic data according to the distribution of abdominal striae
| Davey’s score grade | None | Mild | Moderate | Severe | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27.92 ± 3.1 | 29.5 ± 5.76 | 31.96 ± 5.67 | 33.23 ± 4.68 | ||
| 1.28 ± 0.45 | 2.17 ± 1.31 | 2.57 ± 1.53 | 2.75 ± 1.55 | ||
| 1.22 ± 0.42 | 1.72 ± 0.85 | 1.87 ± 0.91 | 2.52 ± 1.38 | ||
| 76.46 ± 11.66 | 80.14 ± 10.55 | 86.22 ± 11.05 | 84.38 ± 13.49 | ||
| 164.98 ± 6.92 | 162.62 ± 5.38 | 162.96 ± 5.58 | 164.71 ± 4.27 | ||
| 28.11 ± 4.2 | 30.41 ± 4.47 | 32.52 ± 4.21 | 31.05 ± 4.67 |
Scare characters and intrabdominal adhesions in relation to abdominal striae
| Davey’s score grade | None (205) | Mild (109) | Moderate (46) | Severe (48) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.61 ± 0.82 | 0.89 ± 0.64 | 1.07 ± 0.8 | 1.69 ± 1.01 | |||
| 0.84 ± 0.83 | 1.01 ± 0.73 | 1.54 ± 0.62 | 1.73 ± 0.57 | |||
| 1.11 ± 0.99 | 1.34 ± 1.05 | 1.83 ± 1.34 | 2.67 ± 1.23 | |||
| 0.56 ± 0.76 | 0.77 ± 0.73 | 1 ± 0.89 | 1.35 ± 1.06 | |||
| 3.12 ± 2.97 | 4.01 ± 2.52 | 5.43 ± 2.75 | 7.44 ± 2.92 | |||
| 0 ± 0 | 1.82 ± 0.39 | 3.57 ± 0.5 | 6.73 ± 0.94 | |||
| 171 (83.41%) | 24 (22.02%) | 9 (19.57) | 10 (20.83) | |||
| 34 (16.59%) | 74 (67.89%) | 24 (52.17) | 17 (35.42) | |||
| 0 (0%) | 11 (10.09%) | 13 (28.26) | 21 (43.75) | |||
Scar characters in women with intraperitoneal adhesions
| Adhesion occurrence | No | Yes | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Attribute | n (%) | n (%) | |
| 127 (59.35) | 32 (16.49) | |||
| 57 (26.64) | 114 (58.76) | |||
| 14 (6.54) | 38 (19.59) | |||
| 16 (7.48) | 10 (5.15) | |||
| 214 (100) | 194 (100) | |||
| 96 (44.86) | 28 (14.43) | |||
| 44 (20.56) | 88 (45.36) | |||
| 74 (34.58) | 78 (40.21) | |||
| 214 (100) | 194 (100) | |||
| 66 (30.84) | 16 (8.25) | |||
| 90 (42.06) | 83 (42.78) | |||
| 47 (21.96) | 36 (18.56) | |||
| 0 (0) | 42 (21.65) | |||
| 11 (5.14) | 8 (4.12) | |||
| 0 (0) | 9 (4.64) | |||
| 214 (100) | 194 (100) | |||
| 0.5 ± 0.75 | 1.05 ± 0.85 | |||
| 3.08 ± 3.08 | 5.28 ± 2.81 | |||
Linear regression model for the prediction of intra-peritoneal adhesions
| Variables | β | OR | 95% CI OR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.217 | 1.243 | (1.156–1.335) | ||
| −2.093 | 0.123 | (0.071–0.215) | ||
| 0.083 | 1.086 | (1.022–1.155) | ||
| 0.236 | 1.267 | (1.119–1.433) | ||
| 0.479 | 1.615 | (1.374–1.898) |
Cut- off value for the Davey score and the Vancouver score
| Variable | AUC | Cut-off point | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | LR+ | LR- | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davey’s score | 0.811 | 1 | 82.47 | 79.91 | 78.8 | 83.4 | 4.1 | 0.22 | |
| Vancouver score | 0.719 | 2 | 84.02 | 56.07 | 63.4 | 79.5 | 1.91 | 0.28 |
Fig. 1ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristics) curve showing the diagnostic accuracy of the Davey’s and Vancouver’s scores in the prediction of intra-abdominal adhesions