OBJECTIVE: The pathophysiologic processes that result in wound healing are the same regardless of the tissue involved. The purpose of the present meta-analysis is to evaluate whether cesarean scar characteristics may predict the presence of pelvic adhesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review searching the Medline (1966-2016), Scopus (2004-2016), ClinicalTrials.gov (2008-2016), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL (1999-2016) and Google Scholar (2004-2016) databases together with reference lists from included studies. All prospective and retrospective observational cohort studies were included. Statistical meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.1 software. RESULTS: Current evidence suggests that depressed scars are positively associated with intra-abdominal adhesions (ΟR 2.79, 95%CI 1.74-4.46). Elevated scars might also correlate with the presence of adhesions, however, this association did not reach statistical significance (OR 1.61, 95%CI 0.91-2.85, p = 0.10). The same was reported in the case of scar pigmentation (REM, OR 1.68, 95%CI 0.86-3.26, p = 0.13). Flat scars were predictive of the absence of adhesions (899 patients, REM, OR 0.33, 95%CI 0.23-0.54, p < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: According to our meta-analysis, abdominal wound characteristics following cesarean section can predict the presence of adhesions. However, given the small number of published studies, further research is needed to corroborate our findings.
OBJECTIVE: The pathophysiologic processes that result in wound healing are the same regardless of the tissue involved. The purpose of the present meta-analysis is to evaluate whether cesarean scar characteristics may predict the presence of pelvic adhesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review searching the Medline (1966-2016), Scopus (2004-2016), ClinicalTrials.gov (2008-2016), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL (1999-2016) and Google Scholar (2004-2016) databases together with reference lists from included studies. All prospective and retrospective observational cohort studies were included. Statistical meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.1 software. RESULTS: Current evidence suggests that depressed scars are positively associated with intra-abdominal adhesions (ΟR 2.79, 95%CI 1.74-4.46). Elevated scars might also correlate with the presence of adhesions, however, this association did not reach statistical significance (OR 1.61, 95%CI 0.91-2.85, p = 0.10). The same was reported in the case of scar pigmentation (REM, OR 1.68, 95%CI 0.86-3.26, p = 0.13). Flat scars were predictive of the absence of adhesions (899 patients, REM, OR 0.33, 95%CI 0.23-0.54, p < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: According to our meta-analysis, abdominal wound characteristics following cesarean section can predict the presence of adhesions. However, given the small number of published studies, further research is needed to corroborate our findings.
Authors: Mohamed Elprince; Omima T Taha; Zakia M Ibrahim; Rasha E Khamees; Mahmoud A Greash; Khaled A Atwa; Ahmed M Gadallah; Noha Al-Okda; Radwa M Abdel Aal; Mohamed F Ibrahim; Ahmed A Aboelroose; Osama E Ashour; Asmaa M Elgedawy; Amira M Elbahie; Hanan M Ghoneim; Amal A Ahmed Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2021-04-09 Impact factor: 3.007