Literature DB >> 2373734

Rating the burn scar.

T Sullivan1, J Smith, J Kermode, E McIver, D J Courtemanche.   

Abstract

A reliable, objective, and universal method of assessing burn scars does not exist in today's burn literature. Such a method is necessary to provide a descriptive terminology for the comparison of burn scars and the results of treatment. The method should be applicable to patients both within an institution and between burn centers. A burn scar assessment has been devised based on physical parameters. These relate to the healing and maturation of wounds, cosmetic appearance, and the function of the healed skin. Pigmentation, vascularity, pliability, and scar height are assessed independently, with increasing score being assigned to the greater pathologic condition. Normal skin has a score of 0. Seventy-three patients were assessed by three separate occupational therapists and the findings subjected to statistical analysis for interrater reliability. For each parameter a Cohen's kappa statistic of approximately 0.5 +/- 0.1 indicates a statistically significant agreement between observers. These values were found to improve with time. This appears to be a useful tool for the assessment of burn scars, allowing objective comparison of the same scar by different observers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2373734     DOI: 10.1097/00004630-199005000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Rehabil        ISSN: 0273-8481


  101 in total

1.  A polarized multispectral imaging system for quantitative assessment of hypertrophic scars.

Authors:  Pejhman Ghassemi; Taryn E Travis; Lauren T Moffatt; Jeffrey W Shupp; Jessica C Ramella-Roman
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 2.  Short and long-term cosmesis of cervical thyroidectomy scars.

Authors:  M Dordea; S R Aspinall
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Ultrapulsed fractional ablative carbon dioxide laser treatment of hypertrophic burn scars: evaluation of an in-patient controlled, standardized treatment approach.

Authors:  Julian Poetschke; Ulf Dornseifer; Matteo Tretti Clementoni; Markus Reinholz; Hannah Schwaiger; Stephanie Steckmeier; Thomas Ruzicka; Gerd G Gauglitz
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  An intra-individual surgical wound comparison shows that octenidine-based hydrogel wound dressing ameliorates scar appearance following abdominoplasty.

Authors:  Johannes Matiasek; Philip Kienzl; Lukas W Unger; Christoph Grill; Rupert Koller; Bela R Turk
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Cultured skin substitutes reduce donor skin harvesting for closure of excised, full-thickness burns.

Authors:  Steven T Boyce; Richard J Kagan; Kevin P Yakuboff; Nicholas A Meyer; Mary T Rieman; David G Greenhalgh; Glenn D Warden
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Surgical and Traumatic Scars: A Systematic Review of their Development, Content, and Psychometric Validation.

Authors:  Lily R Mundy; H Catherine Miller; Anne F Klassen; Stefan J Cano; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.326

7.  Efficacy of Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser in the Treatment of Mature Burn Scars: A Clinical, Histopathological, and Histochemical Study.

Authors:  Khaled El-Hoshy; Mona R E Abdel-Halim; Dina Dorgham; Safinaz Salah El-Din Sayed; Mona El-Kalioby
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2017-12-01

8.  Carbon dioxide laser ablation with immediate autografting in a full-thickness porcine burn model.

Authors:  R D Glatter; J S Goldberg; K T Schomacker; C C Compton; T J Flotte; D P Bua; K W Greaves; N S Nishioka; R L Sheridan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Comparison of Fractional CO2 Laser, Verapamil, and Triamcinolone for the Treatment of Keloid.

Authors:  Sunil Srivastava; Hiranmayi Kumari; Abhimanyu Singh
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Hypertrophic versus non hypertrophic scars compared by immunohistochemistry and laser confocal microscopy: type I and III collagens.

Authors:  Gisele V Oliveira; Hal K Hawkins; David Chinkes; Ann Burke; Andre Luiz Pasqua Tavares; Marcia Ramos-e-Silva; Thomas B Albrecht; Gregory T Kitten; David N Herndon
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.